Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() At the local antiques flea market yesterday, someone had an old RCA 2-8MHz AM/CW transciever. I'm 80% certain it was model "ETM-25", but it might have been "EMT-25" -- I've spent ten or twenty minutes googling and have found no references to it. Had a single 807 output and a pair of 807s in the modulator section. Guy wanted $6000 (~ USD475) for it, and I walked on by. He said he'll be there next week -- anyone have any data on this radio? 73 --XE1/N1GAK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lawrence Statton" wrote in message ... At the local antiques flea market yesterday, someone had an old RCA 2-8MHz AM/CW transciever. I'm 80% certain it was model "ETM-25", but it might have been "EMT-25" -- I've spent ten or twenty minutes googling and have found no references to it. Had a single 807 output and a pair of 807s in the modulator section. Guy wanted $6000 (~ USD475) for it, and I walked on by. He said he'll be there next week -- anyone have any data on this radio? 73 --XE1/N1GAK This sounds like it may be Radiomarine equipment. Radiomarine was a division of RCA that provided ship to shore communication and equipment. Many of their models had an ET prefix. The frequencies are about right for marine use especially inland waterways. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Richard Knoppow wrote:
"Lawrence Statton" wrote in message ... At the local antiques flea market yesterday, someone had an old RCA 2-8MHz AM/CW transciever. I'm 80% certain it was model "ETM-25", but it might have been "EMT-25" -- I've spent ten or twenty minutes googling and have found no references to it. Had a single 807 output and a pair of 807s in the modulator section. Guy wanted $6000 (~ USD475) for it, and I walked on by. He said he'll be there next week -- anyone have any data on this radio? 73 --XE1/N1GAK This sounds like it may be Radiomarine equipment. Radiomarine was a division of RCA that provided ship to shore communication and equipment. Many of their models had an ET prefix. The frequencies are about right for marine use especially inland waterways. The frequency range definitely was a giveaway. Before the VHF marine band came about, anyone who had a radio in their boat was in that range (though I gather radio was a lot less in common use in boats at that point, because of the bulk of the equipment, because of the cost, and maybe there were more restrictions in that HF band). I remember when the deadline to move to SSB in that HF marine band came along. There was lots of talk about what could be done with the old AM transceivers, but of course by then there wasn't that much interest in AM on the HF bands, so it never seemed to be the windfall that surplus FM rigs in the VHF bands were. Michael VE2BVW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|