Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Barry wrote: I know this is a very long shot, but I wondered if anyone has a geiger-muller tube lurking anywhere? Perhaps you may know of a supplier or have an old geiger counter that you may wish to dispose of? Not sure if you've seen these but... http://www.goldmine-elec-products.co...?number=G17365 The thing about these is that the glass is designed to block lower energy radiation. Still, if you want to detect background gamma radiation, it's not bad. It's probably okay for beta radiation too although you don't know until you test it. The market is glutted with Victoreen survey meters. Millions of them were made for the civil defense folks in the fifties and sixties, and they are all on the surplus market. They also don't respond well to lower energy particles, and the scale calibration is useless because the integrator stage is intended for use in very high radiation environments, but they are very cheap. But there was also a need for geiger counters so you could go out and prospect for uranium. I hadn't given it a lot of thought, until a few years ago when I found a "magazine" about how to prospect for uranium. I guess it was published by Fawcett, from the fifties, when it was common to issue single issue magazines that would be books if they were published more formally. I have no idea how common the "hobby" was, or how many geiger counters it sold, but it did seem a big concept for a while. Robert Heinlein even has some bad guys in one of his juvenile novels prospecting for uranium on the moon. There have been solid-state replacements for geiger tubes in recent decades, but at the moment I can't think of what. Some projects used existing components that reacted to radiation, but I seem to recall there were solid-state devices that came along. Michael VE2BVW |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kenneth Scharf" wrote in message ... Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: Kenneth Scharf wrote: Once upon a time I recall the type CK1026 GM tube. This was about the size of a 50C5 tube, but with a single pin and an aquadag coating on the outside of the tube. This tube was used in a geiger counter project that was in one of Alfred Morgan's 'boys books of radio and electronics', either the 2nd or 3rd book. There were other types of GM tubes made, but the CK1026 was one of the least expensive and was used in many simple radiation detectors. The ones used in the 1960's radiation detectors and then sold in a pack of 3 for $1 at Radio Shack in the late 1960's looked like long neon bulbs with an extra wire comming out of them. I think they were around two inches long, but it's been a long time since I've seen them. Considering that they were designed to detect levels of radiation that would only exist if you were close to ground zero and poking your head out of a shelter in the rubble of an east coast (US) city, for all I know they really were neon bulbs. :-) Geoff. You probably could use a Neon bulb as a radiation detector. You'd have to keep the tube in the dark (inside a black plastic box) and carefully adjust the voltage across the tube so it was just below the firing voltage (need a well regulated power supply). Then an alpha or beta particle might be enough to trigger the tube into conduction. The sensitivity would be determined how close to the firing voltage the bias supply was set. I recall being unconvinced when a customer complained that the neon lamp in his old, rotary disk type depth finder would not work at night unless he shined a flashlight on it. He was absolutely correct, and as time went on, we found that as all neon flash lamps (mostly NE2's and NE51's I think) grew old and weak, they required a little extra external excitation (flashlight worked ok) to light. Old Chief Lynn, W7LTQ |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, coffelt2 wrote:
"Kenneth Scharf" wrote in message ... Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: Kenneth Scharf wrote: Once upon a time I recall the type CK1026 GM tube. This was about the size of a 50C5 tube, but with a single pin and an aquadag coating on the outside of the tube. This tube was used in a geiger counter project that was in one of Alfred Morgan's 'boys books of radio and electronics', either the 2nd or 3rd book. There were other types of GM tubes made, but the CK1026 was one of the least expensive and was used in many simple radiation detectors. The ones used in the 1960's radiation detectors and then sold in a pack of 3 for $1 at Radio Shack in the late 1960's looked like long neon bulbs with an extra wire comming out of them. I think they were around two inches long, but it's been a long time since I've seen them. Considering that they were designed to detect levels of radiation that would only exist if you were close to ground zero and poking your head out of a shelter in the rubble of an east coast (US) city, for all I know they really were neon bulbs. :-) Geoff. You probably could use a Neon bulb as a radiation detector. You'd have to keep the tube in the dark (inside a black plastic box) and carefully adjust the voltage across the tube so it was just below the firing voltage (need a well regulated power supply). Then an alpha or beta particle might be enough to trigger the tube into conduction. The sensitivity would be determined how close to the firing voltage the bias supply was set. I recall being unconvinced when a customer complained that the neon lamp in his old, rotary disk type depth finder would not work at night unless he shined a flashlight on it. He was absolutely correct, and as time went on, we found that as all neon flash lamps (mostly NE2's and NE51's I think) grew old and weak, they required a little extra external excitation (flashlight worked ok) to light. It's not so much that they needed light, but they could no longer light up with the old value resistor. Changing the resistor would have worked, as did the external excitation with a light. That was the previous point, you put enough current into the neon bulb so it's not quite lighting up, and then external radiation would excite it. It's about setting a threshold right below where the bulb lights up, and then any external excitation ignites it. Michael VE2BVW |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:28:52 -0500, Michael Black wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, coffelt2 wrote: "Kenneth Scharf" wrote in message ... Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: Kenneth Scharf wrote: Once upon a time I recall the type CK1026 GM tube. This was about the size of a 50C5 tube, but with a single pin and an aquadag coating on the outside of the tube. This tube was used in a geiger counter project that was in one of Alfred Morgan's 'boys books of radio and electronics', either the 2nd or 3rd book. There were other types of GM tubes made, but the CK1026 was one of the least expensive and was used in many simple radiation detectors. The ones used in the 1960's radiation detectors and then sold in a pack of 3 for $1 at Radio Shack in the late 1960's looked like long neon bulbs with an extra wire comming out of them. I think they were around two inches long, but it's been a long time since I've seen them. Considering that they were designed to detect levels of radiation that would only exist if you were close to ground zero and poking your head out of a shelter in the rubble of an east coast (US) city, for all I know they really were neon bulbs. :-) Geoff. You probably could use a Neon bulb as a radiation detector. You'd have to keep the tube in the dark (inside a black plastic box) and carefully adjust the voltage across the tube so it was just below the firing voltage (need a well regulated power supply). Then an alpha or beta particle might be enough to trigger the tube into conduction. The sensitivity would be determined how close to the firing voltage the bias supply was set. I recall being unconvinced when a customer complained that the neon lamp in his old, rotary disk type depth finder would not work at night unless he shined a flashlight on it. He was absolutely correct, and as time went on, we found that as all neon flash lamps (mostly NE2's and NE51's I think) grew old and weak, they required a little extra external excitation (flashlight worked ok) to light. It's not so much that they needed light, but they could no longer light up with the old value resistor. Changing the resistor would have worked, as did the external excitation with a light. That was the previous point, you put enough current into the neon bulb so it's not quite lighting up, and then external radiation would excite it. It's about setting a threshold right below where the bulb lights up, and then any external excitation ignites it. Michael VE2BVW Probably more a question of voltage supply rather than resistor value, as unless the neon fires, the drop across the resistor is zero, and so the resistance value is not controlling the starting. Peter |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Dettmann" wrote in message ... On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:28:52 -0500, Michael Black wrote: On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, coffelt2 wrote: "Kenneth Scharf" wrote in message ... Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: Kenneth Scharf wrote: Once upon a time I recall the type CK1026 GM tube. This was about the size of a 50C5 tube, but with a single pin and an aquadag coating on the outside of the tube. This tube was used in a geiger counter project that was in one of Alfred Morgan's 'boys books of radio and electronics', either the 2nd or 3rd book. There were other types of GM tubes made, but the CK1026 was one of the least expensive and was used in many simple radiation detectors. The ones used in the 1960's radiation detectors and then sold in a pack of 3 for $1 at Radio Shack in the late 1960's looked like long neon bulbs with an extra wire comming out of them. I think they were around two inches long, but it's been a long time since I've seen them. Considering that they were designed to detect levels of radiation that would only exist if you were close to ground zero and poking your head out of a shelter in the rubble of an east coast (US) city, for all I know they really were neon bulbs. :-) Geoff. You probably could use a Neon bulb as a radiation detector. You'd have to keep the tube in the dark (inside a black plastic box) and carefully adjust the voltage across the tube so it was just below the firing voltage (need a well regulated power supply). Then an alpha or beta particle might be enough to trigger the tube into conduction. The sensitivity would be determined how close to the firing voltage the bias supply was set. I recall being unconvinced when a customer complained that the neon lamp in his old, rotary disk type depth finder would not work at night unless he shined a flashlight on it. He was absolutely correct, and as time went on, we found that as all neon flash lamps (mostly NE2's and NE51's I think) grew old and weak, they required a little extra external excitation (flashlight worked ok) to light. It's not so much that they needed light, but they could no longer light up with the old value resistor. Changing the resistor would have worked, as did the external excitation with a light. That was the previous point, you put enough current into the neon bulb so it's not quite lighting up, and then external radiation would excite it. It's about setting a threshold right below where the bulb lights up, and then any external excitation ignites it. Michael VE2BVW Probably more a question of voltage supply rather than resistor value, as unless the neon fires, the drop across the resistor is zero, and so the resistance value is not controlling the starting. Peter And thus the irritating (and sometimes useful) Neon tube oscillator! Old Chief Lynn |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kenneth Scharf" wrote in message ... You probably could use a Neon bulb as a radiation detector. You'd have to keep the tube in the dark (inside a black plastic box) and carefully adjust the voltage across the tube so it was just below the firing voltage (need a well regulated power supply). Then an alpha or beta particle might be enough to trigger the tube into conduction. The sensitivity would be determined how close to the firing voltage the bias supply was set. GM tubes don't work quite like that. They have a halogen gas in there as well to "quench" the conduction caused by the radiation. -- 73 Brian G8OSN/W8OSN www.g8osn.net |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Sparkfun.com sells a 712 end-window geiger tube from LND, Inc. It's sensitive to alpha and beta particles as well as gamma radiation, and it's something like $70. They have a complete geiger counter kit which includes a DC-DC converter to get the 500V for $140. They currently have a promotion going on which is causing their site to be hammered, but it should be back to normal in a day or two. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|