Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Way to go, Bill! I used to work for a military microwave contractor.
Some of the engineers were hams, so when they had finally gotten the 168Ghz Gunn oscillators running, we just couldn't help ourselves making new ham frequency record contacts using the manufacturing plant's sheet metal roof as a passive repeater. You know how small 10Ghz is....Imagine 168 Ghz, broadband FM..... Not many on that band, though....(c; We were full duplex, about 800 Mhz split. Great split for low desense! First IF was 146 Mhz. Used my 2M HT for receiver.... Larry W4CSC Maybe we could get the power grid fixed if every politician regulating the power companies wasn't on their payrolls. |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm 29 and study. I'm still wondering what the exams will look like. In Canada, there are really tough, for what people told me. Take a look over at: http://www.qrz.com/ham/index.html practice exams there. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Casey" wrote in message ... Ghost Chip wrote: As an electrical engineer who has tinkered with electronics for 40 years, I never found time to practice & learn code. It was obsolete even back then. If they drop the code requirement, I'll get a ham license and talk as well as listen. Zoram The "Technician" license does not require code, and will let you use all ham bands 50MHz and higher. You just need to take a fairly simple written test. See: http://www.w5yi.org/vol-exam.htm to find a test site, and http://www.qrz.com/ham/index.html for practice exams You're correct. I have been able to fly through the practice exams for years but never wanted to learn the telegraph code. |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "john stewart" wrote in message ... David Stinson wrote: Let us welcome the new additions to our ranks: I'm so old I remember when there were quite a few who could build their own rig!! From scratch!! Cheers, JLS I built one when I was 14 but talked illegally on it. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey, that looks like the Weller Gun I've had for 35 years!
Careful before they outlaw them. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ghost Chip" wrote in message
news:fVd2b.7931$QT5.5157@fed1read02... Hey, that looks like the Weller Gun I've had for 35 years! Careful before they outlaw them. At least Carl Weller saw his first prototype Weller soldering gun go to the Smithsonian before he died. Did you know that the prototype was fashioned from wood? GB |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let us welcome the new additions to our ranks:
I'm so old I remember when there were quite a few who could build their own rig!! From scratch!! Cheers, JLS I built one when I was 14 but talked illegally on it. My wife (a non-ham then) never could understand why I built a one-tube xmtr and a one-tube rcvr (both powered by a one-tube power supply), made one contact (CW, of course), and then tore the rig apart. But it was fun, and I needed those parts for the next project. --Myron, W0PBV. -- Five boxes preserve our freedoms: soap, ballot, witness, jury, and cartridge PhD EE (retired). "Barbershop" tenor. CDL(PTX). W0PBV. (785) 539-4448 NRA Life Member and Certified Instructor (Home Firearm Safety, Rifle, Pistol) |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
....and what does this masturbatory comment have to do with mode bandwidth?
"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... Wow! You'd probably faint if you saw the moon bounce rig I used to have! I ran 1500W PEP into 33dB of stacked beams over 3 megawatts ERP! On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 15:24:37 GMT, "SQL Servant" wrote: I used to subscribe to that theory, but no more. There was a time when CW was the best mode for weak signal work, but as of my last experience (1990 or so) AMTOR had it beat hands down. I hear that AMTOR has since been replaced with yet more efficient digital modes. Sure, if you hoard a few kHz of your bandwidth for your mode, you're certain to have better data transfer integrity. The U.S. military has some real bandwidth hogging modes they use. You're comparing apples-n-oranges to compare CW to even AMTOR. You should realize that! Are you trying to support your feeble point of view through deliberate misrepresentation or are you really this ignorant of radio emission and spectrum occupation? If it's the latter, I hope you're no longer licensed or on the air. Larry W4CSC Maybe we could get the power grid fixed if every politician regulating the power companies wasn't on their payrolls. |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() SQL Servant wrote: ....and what does this masturbatory comment have to do with mode bandwidth? "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message Wow! You'd probably faint if you saw the moon bounce rig I used to have! I ran 1500W PEP into 33dB of stacked beams over 3 megawatts ERP! Isn't it obvious? Lacking a real answer, a little razzle dazzle and we should just fall in line. Jeff -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin "A life lived in fear is a life half lived." Tara Morice as Fran, from the movie "Strictly Ballroom" |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dwaine,
The Canadian amateur exams are probably not as difficult as you may think. The Radio Amateurs of Canada have an excellent book available to help you to study for the Basic exam (you can buy one at any Hamfest, or from the RAC directly at www.rac.ca.) The RAC site can also help you find an examiner in your area when you're ready to give the test a try. The Basic exam consists of 100 questions covering basic electronic theory, radio and antenna theory, radio regulations, etc. - a pass mark is 60%. Industry Canada, those happy folks who issue Amaueur licences up here ![]() http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/inter...f05378e.htmlOn These questions are presented in the same format that you will see on your exam. The generator software will put together 100 randomly-selected questions, let you know if your answer was correct as you answer each question (and indicate the correct answer if you selected a wrong answer), and score your exam as you go. You can do it - Go for it! Phil Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:20:26 GMT, Dwaine Garden wrote: Bobby wrote: Hello all, I'm only 22 years old and interested in anything electronic. Computers, I'm 29 and study. I'm still wondering what the exams will look like. In Canada, there are really tough, for what people told me. Dwaine. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transmission Lines & Electrical Code | Antenna | |||
Morse code teacher | Antenna | |||
N.E.C Grounding Code for Arials | Antenna | |||
FA Microcraft Code Reader | Boatanchors | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Boatanchors |