Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I posted several weeks back about the idea of a HAM newcomer setting
up a vintage station. I came away feeling that it was going to be a challenge, but is certainly doable. I am working on sourcing some code training software, and have been doing a lot of listening with my SX-71. AMing appeals to me on the surface... it seem more gear oriented, and mostly (only?) vintage. No matter how well I dial in SSB, it just lacks fidelity compared with the AM, at least on my receiver. But, I have a long way to go with my listening. I saw what seemed to be a reasonable deal (except for shipping) on a working and mint looking Viking Invader 2000 ssb/cw/am, and bought it. I have been into tubes from an audio standpoint for most of my life and happened across a pair of NOS 4-1000a tubes a while back. I had envisioned someday doing something homebrew with them. Well the Invader uses a pair of 4-400s, so I will get a taste of what that might entail. It is running 2200 plate volts, and I have read they glow orange. Anyway, probably a dumb reason to pick a particular transmitter, but the 4-400s, the condition, the power capabilities, the looks all sucked me in. So tell me, am I in way over my head or can I handle this beast? Dumber questions.... what else am I going to need to set up my station? I already have the SX-101a, the Invader 2000, and lots of test equipment... scope, signal and sweep generators, VTVM w/ HV probe, etc. I konw I need a key and a mic and to set up a proper antenna and that is all I know. What else should I be trying to accumulate while I work on my license? If this is the wrong place to be asking these questions, somebody set me straight. Thanks for your help. Dan |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
geojunkie wrote:
I saw what seemed to be a reasonable deal (except for shipping) on a working and mint looking Viking Invader 2000 ssb/cw/am, and bought it. Yikes! Talking about jumping off the deep end! :-) Nice rig. You'll have fun with that one. -Bill |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, antennas are important, and the bigger the better, but...
I worked Great Britain from Massachusetts on 10 watts with a simple 40 meter dipole up about 20 feet. It wasn't ideal, but it worked. I worked Estonia from Oregon on SSB (all tubes, too) with 100 watts with a 10 meter half-wave loop pinned to the ceiling of a spare room in a 1-story rented house. You _will_ do _much_ better with a "real" antenna system, but you _can_ do _amazing_ things with a few pieces of wire and some creativity. So if you can, by all means put up the heavy metal in the sky, but don't stop if you can't do it right off. Get a copy of the ARRL antenna book, or maybe a copy of the Handbook from the year your rig was born. You live out in the country so you don't need to worry about stealth antennas -- if you have trees and aren't afraid of heights they make very good supports for long wire antennas. Just think about who you want to talk to this year and aim the antenna appropriately. No Spam wrote in message news:ifgU75G3LLdo-pn2-IWO2j4d3zUld@localhost... On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:00:19 UTC, (geojunkie) wrote: Antennas. A ham station is the antenna farm. The rest of it is much less important. Do you have the room to put up a 40 meter dipole? 66 feet linear length. Get it up at least 40 feet, the higher the better. For 20 and above, a basic antenna is an 3 element trap yagi. Again 40 feet minimum height, 80 is even better. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"geojunkie" wrote in message
om... I posted several weeks back about the idea of a HAM newcomer setting up a vintage station. I came away feeling that it was going to be a challenge, but is certainly doable. I am working on sourcing some code training software, and have been doing a lot of listening with my SX-71. AMing appeals to me on the surface... it seem more gear oriented, and mostly (only?) vintage. No matter how well I dial in SSB, it just lacks fidelity compared with the AM, at least on my receiver. But, I have a long way to go with my listening. AM is a fine mode, especially for vintage gear. SSB has more punch, and will get through a pileup better, but nothing beats a good armchair qso with AM. I saw what seemed to be a reasonable deal (except for shipping) on a working and mint looking Viking Invader 2000 ssb/cw/am, and bought it. I have been into tubes from an audio standpoint for most of my life and happened across a pair of NOS 4-1000a tubes a while back. I had envisioned someday doing something homebrew with them. Well the Invader uses a pair of 4-400s, so I will get a taste of what that might entail. It is running 2200 plate volts, and I have read they glow orange. Anyway, probably a dumb reason to pick a particular transmitter, but the 4-400s, the condition, the power capabilities, the looks all sucked me in. So tell me, am I in way over my head or can I handle this beast? That depends on how understanding your wife is ;-J. I've been in over my head for years, and she's almost, but not quite, used to it. If you can read a schematic, you're fine. Dumber questions.... what else am I going to need to set up my station? I already have the SX-101a, the Invader 2000, and lots of test equipment... scope, signal and sweep generators, VTVM w/ HV probe, etc. I konw I need a key and a mic and to set up a proper antenna and that is all I know. What else should I be trying to accumulate while I work on my license? If this is the wrong place to be asking these questions, somebody set me straight. Thanks for your help. Well, I don't know as there's a "better" place, so I'll answer them here. You'll need a dummy load, which is a 50 ohm non-reactive resister used to tune the transmitter without radiating a signal. Heath "Cantennas" are excellent, and E.F. Johnson made good units too. You'll need a _good_ microphone: "communications" quality mikes don't cut it on AM, so get one that's made for recording and/or broadcast. You'll need a _big_ antenna. If it survives the winter, it wasn't big enough! Since most AM operation is on 80 and 40 meters, I recommend a vertical with a minimum of 64 1/4 wave ground radials. If you can't do that, just suffer with a dipole like the rest of us: what the hell, you've got an Invader ... You'll need a _separate_ area of the house to use for your ham "shack". Trust me: it _must_ be separate. Pick the place that has the best access to the antenna farm, the best ventilation, the best view, and the best AC feed - and make it into your wife's sewing room while you set up a dehumidifier in the cellar. Don't ask me how I know. 73, and good luck, Bill |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't expect to get it right the first time..... Got my ticket in 1949 and I am
still looking for a good combination for my interest. My interest have changed a few times over the years. Am now fooling around with QRP. Thats what makes this a great hobby.... no reason to get bored with what you have! (broke=not working, retired=not working, retired=broke) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
1) If you're into AM, then go for a quality mic. Make certain the rig is
aligned to give the best audio quality signal you can send. 2) For a good signal, I'd recommend a vertical, with lots of radials. You can homebrew one or buy one on-line. I've used an 18AVT for 80m and 40m. Some claim that verticals are more noise sensitive...but that's only if you're listening to DX-lightning strikes. A low dipole, even one at half-wave up, will have lots of high-angle...means you'll hear lots of close-in stations but also close-in static sources. It's probably a coin-toss. 3) and, keep you're hands off the high voltage! Good luck! +++ geojunkie wrote: I posted several weeks back about the idea of a HAM newcomer setting up a vintage station. I came away feeling that it was going to be a challenge, but is certainly doable. I am working on sourcing some code training software, and have been doing a lot of listening with my SX-71. AMing appeals to me on the surface... it seem more gear oriented, and mostly (only?) vintage. No matter how well I dial in SSB, it just lacks fidelity compared with the AM, at least on my receiver. But, I have a long way to go with my listening. I saw what seemed to be a reasonable deal (except for shipping) on a working and mint looking Viking Invader 2000 ssb/cw/am, and bought it. I have been into tubes from an audio standpoint for most of my life and happened across a pair of NOS 4-1000a tubes a while back. I had envisioned someday doing something homebrew with them. Well the Invader uses a pair of 4-400s, so I will get a taste of what that might entail. It is running 2200 plate volts, and I have read they glow orange. Anyway, probably a dumb reason to pick a particular transmitter, but the 4-400s, the condition, the power capabilities, the looks all sucked me in. So tell me, am I in way over my head or can I handle this beast? Dumber questions.... what else am I going to need to set up my station? I already have the SX-101a, the Invader 2000, and lots of test equipment... scope, signal and sweep generators, VTVM w/ HV probe, etc. I konw I need a key and a mic and to set up a proper antenna and that is all I know. What else should I be trying to accumulate while I work on my license? If this is the wrong place to be asking these questions, somebody set me straight. Thanks for your help. Dan |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hope you are turning up AF gain control full and using RF gain to control
volume on SSB. Otherwise overloads RX diode detectors and distorts. Harry, VE3GRO Harry MacLean, VE3GRO 500 Riverside Drive, London, ON N6H 2R7 (519) 473-1668 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just remember that the Invader 2000 is basically a SSB transmitter,
and not plate modulated AM if you use it in that mode. It probably takes one sideband (maybe both sidebands) and injects carrier to make an AM like signal. I envy you. The Invader 2000 was the object of my amateur radio dreams when I was 16 years old. Ray K1XV |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|