Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() " Uncle Peter" wrote in message news:N_ULb.29439$WQ3.24174@lakeread05... Cherry SX-28s are scarce. Especially ones with the dial locks, no rust, no dust, no mods... Them seem to prefer damp cellars and garages in later life. I have two garage rats that need full restoration--awaiting my retirement time in a few years. They also seem to bunch with with SX-42s, another two locally found items that also liked dark places. Must be a mating thing? Pete It's a stacking thing. What else could you put under one of these radios? Frank Dresser |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ...
"Robert Casey" wrote in message ... Being "rare" isn't significant to me. A rare radio implies that they didn't sell too well, because of bad style, engineering, or just too expensive for what it did. I have a web page showing the "common" easily found radios that I own. http://www.geocities.com/wa2ise/radios/common.html I like my radios "well done" :-) Well, sellers sometimes like to say a mass produced item is rare, not because it didn't fit a market or wasn't a good deal for the money, but because "it probably was ahead of it's time:". Frank Dresser The obvious reason for claiming anything "rare" is to increase the selling price. Rare suggests hard to get, not found in every collection- thereby invoking supply/demand dynamics. Case in point: I have a Zenith tabletop, model 5G537. It uses chassis 5A02, the same as console 5G572. According to Zenith records, only 4000 chassis were built. An unknown number were put in tabletops compared to consoles. In the big scheme of things for Zenith, this model is rare. Can I legitimately advertise it as rare? Sure. Compared to other chassis like 6B03 found in 224,000 portables (like 6G601 variants). Does that make my 5G537 worth $500? Probably not. But at least I can PROVE rarity based on facts, not on a hope, guess, limited experience, or dream. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
most folks get rarity and desirability confused.
Rarity is component of desireability, not the other way around! Same with age, condition, etc. Mark Oppat "Dan Busetti" wrote in message om... "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "Robert Casey" wrote in message ... Being "rare" isn't significant to me. A rare radio implies that they didn't sell too well, because of bad style, engineering, or just too expensive for what it did. I have a web page showing the "common" easily found radios that I own. http://www.geocities.com/wa2ise/radios/common.html I like my radios "well done" :-) Well, sellers sometimes like to say a mass produced item is rare, not because it didn't fit a market or wasn't a good deal for the money, but because "it probably was ahead of it's time:". Frank Dresser The obvious reason for claiming anything "rare" is to increase the selling price. Rare suggests hard to get, not found in every collection- thereby invoking supply/demand dynamics. Case in point: I have a Zenith tabletop, model 5G537. It uses chassis 5A02, the same as console 5G572. According to Zenith records, only 4000 chassis were built. An unknown number were put in tabletops compared to consoles. In the big scheme of things for Zenith, this model is rare. Can I legitimately advertise it as rare? Sure. Compared to other chassis like 6B03 found in 224,000 portables (like 6G601 variants). Does that make my 5G537 worth $500? Probably not. But at least I can PROVE rarity based on facts, not on a hope, guess, limited experience, or dream. |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Oppat" wrote in message ... most folks get rarity and desirability confused. Rarity is component of desireability, not the other way around! Same with age, condition, etc. Mark Oppat Yeah, rarity and desirability are hardly the same thing. If the practical people of the past wanted to pay for, or keep, any mass produced items -- they would not now be rare!! Of course, collecting isn't practical, it's emotional. I have several old radios, mostly boatanchors. They all still work as well as they did about 50 years ago. I'm sure the many people who made these radios common thought they were a good deal for the money. I'm also sure the original boxes and packing materials would now be worth more than the radios they once contained. Frank Dresser |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() My copy of "Short wave receivers - past and present" lists the SX-28 as COMMON Dave |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Holford wrote:
My copy of "Short wave receivers - past and present" lists the SX-28 as COMMON Dave Maybe an understatement. -Bill |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott W. Harvey" wrote in message The SX-28 may not be rare in actuality, but it is rare in the sense that not too many radios with its level of performance were built in that era, and fewer still survive completely intact. -Scott No that's not true there were a lot of radios as good if not better in performance than the 28. One for instance is the Hammarlund Super Pros that were mass produced and served the same purpose and the great HROs. The looks of the SX-28 is what makes it desirable along with its great audio. That's what made them popular with Military and FCC monitors was they were less fatiguing to listen to. Its arguably the best looking boatanchor of all time too. But its not rare and its the one radio if asked to be found can be. I've restored several SX-28s and SX-28As and they always seem to find their way into my shack. |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If they're that plentiful send one to my address : )
"Brian Hill" brianehill@charterDOTnet wrote in message ... "Scott W. Harvey" wrote in message The SX-28 may not be rare in actuality, but it is rare in the sense that not too many radios with its level of performance were built in that era, and fewer still survive completely intact. -Scott No that's not true there were a lot of radios as good if not better in performance than the 28. One for instance is the Hammarlund Super Pros that were mass produced and served the same purpose and the great HROs. The looks of the SX-28 is what makes it desirable along with its great audio. That's what made them popular with Military and FCC monitors was they were less fatiguing to listen to. Its arguably the best looking boatanchor of all time too. But its not rare and its the one radio if asked to be found can be. I've restored several SX-28s and SX-28As and they always seem to find their way into my shack. |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I mean it. My S-118 Mk II is lonely.
"Steven Dinius" wrote in message ... If they're that plentiful send one to my address : ) "Brian Hill" brianehill@charterDOTnet wrote in message ... "Scott W. Harvey" wrote in message The SX-28 may not be rare in actuality, but it is rare in the sense that not too many radios with its level of performance were built in that era, and fewer still survive completely intact. -Scott No that's not true there were a lot of radios as good if not better in performance than the 28. One for instance is the Hammarlund Super Pros that were mass produced and served the same purpose and the great HROs. The looks of the SX-28 is what makes it desirable along with its great audio. That's what made them popular with Military and FCC monitors was they were less fatiguing to listen to. Its arguably the best looking boatanchor of all time too. But its not rare and its the one radio if asked to be found can be. I've restored several SX-28s and SX-28As and they always seem to find their way into my shack. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|