Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
William Warren wrote:
".Bill M" wrote in message ... Ray Collins wrote: 20 meters. Is it just like AM tower arrays, ground radials as long as the tower is high at every degree of the compass? If it were me I'd hang 3 separate dipoles, inverted vees or quarter-wave slopers off of the tower. The tower shunt feed scheme works fairly well on 40/80 but I've never had much luck at 20 and above. What ground system do you use? I've heard various reports about how many radials are needed, and where/if they must/should be connected at places other than the center: the only "hard" documentation is on AM broadcast antennas, and I don't have the budget to buy space next to a salt marsh ... Bill I had a 40 meter vertical with 60 radials that really kicked butt. Outperformed a nearby ham's 3 el "contest station" yagi in most every case for the real long-haul stuff. My son and I put the radials in progressively - the ant was located in the bush in rocky terrain and was nothing more than a push up TV mast balanced on a coke bottle and guyed with nylon rope. After about 2 dozen radials the difference wasn't really noticeable and this jives with results I've heard from other people. A 20 meter vertical (those push up masts are frequency agile-hehe) at the same location was a dud compared to an A3 on a 15 foot mast further down the hillside. I shunt fed a tower once (60 ft with triband quad on top), no particular ground system. Many of these schemes involve 'tuning' the ground lead in order to get them to work. I got it to work on 40, can't recall how 80 acted but it wasn't near as good as a 1/4 wave sloper from the top of the same tower and it kept the shack hot with RF. Again, it was a dud on 20 and above. My guys were grounded and that seems counter-intuitive for a vertical radiator. I'm of the mind, based on my experience, that ground-mounted 20-15-10 stuff just isn't very effective compared to say a ground plane scenario where the antenna can be elevated. And then that raises the question whether or not an inverted vee at the same height as a ground plane is more effective. I'm not sure there's an answer to that question but vees and dipoles are easier to construct at the top of a tower :-) -Bill M |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |