Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
To All,
I just purchased a Lafayette kt-200 and research on the net says it has a jack for a Q multiplier. Further research on a Q multiplier shows that is some how acts like crystal filter, only variable and it appears that it can also boost poor signals??? Can someone give me a readers digest, not overly technical explanation of "how do it work" ????? and how well does it work???? In addition any suggestions as to which model, of the many that heathkit sold, would be, arguably, the best for this application..... Bob in phx |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob,
A "Q multiplier" is just what the name says. It is a tuned circuit (either a narrow bandpass filter or a narrow band notch filter) which incorporates a means of "multiplying" the filter Q. "Q" of a tuned circuit is defined as 2*pi*the ratio of energy stored to energy dissipated per cycle in the tuned circuit (or inductor or capacitor...), which for the usual parallel tuned circuit is essentially equivalent to the ratio of the circuit inductive reactance to the resistance of the inductor. The Q increase is achieved by hooking up an amplifier to provide positive signal feedback, from the filter's output back to it's input. The amplitude of the positive feedback is set just high enough to cancel most of the losses in the filter, but not high enough to make the circuit oscillate. By canceling the losses in the filter, the effective Q of the passive filter is increased, and therefore the bandwidth is decreased, giving a very sharp frequency response. This doesn't come for free, however. Since there is an active amplifier involved, there will be some noise output from the filter along with the desired signal. Bob WB4TGG bobinphx wrote: To All, I just purchased a Lafayette kt-200 and research on the net says it has a jack for a Q multiplier. Further research on a Q multiplier shows that is some how acts like crystal filter, only variable and it appears that it can also boost poor signals??? Can someone give me a readers digest, not overly technical explanation of "how do it work" ????? and how well does it work???? In addition any suggestions as to which model, of the many that heathkit sold, would be, arguably, the best for this application..... Bob in phx |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bobinphx" wrote in message news:L6KCc.1254$Ph.98@fed1read06... To All, I just purchased a Lafayette kt-200 and research on the net says it has a jack for a Q multiplier. Further research on a Q multiplier shows that is some how acts like crystal filter, only variable and it appears that it can also boost poor signals??? Can someone give me a readers digest, not overly technical explanation of "how do it work" ????? I scanned this, not from the Reader's Digest, but from the 1964 ARRL handbook: The "Q Multiplier" is a stable regenerative stage that is connected in parallel with one of the i.f. stages of a receiver. In one condition it narrows the bandwidth and in the other condition it produces a sharp "null" or rejection notch. A "tuning" adjustment controls the frequency of the peak or null, moving it across the normal pass band of the receiver i.f. amplifier. The shape of the peak or null is always that of as single tuned circuit (Fig. 2-50) but the effective Q is adjustable over a wide range. A Q Multiplier is most effective at an i.f. of 500 kc. or less; at higher frequencies the rejection notch becomes wide enough (measured in cycles per second) to reject a major portion of a phone signal. Within its useful range, however, the Q Multiplier will reject an interfering carrier without degrading the quality of the desired signal. In the "peak" condition the Q Multiplier can be made to oscillate by advancing the "peak" (regeneration) control far enough, and in this condition it can be made to serve as a beat frequency oscillator. However, it cannot be made to serve as a selective element and as a b.f.o. at the same time. and how well does it work???? They work well, within their limitations. The peak bandwidth can be very sharp, but off the peak the curve slopes down more gently and doesn't provide a dramatic difference in adjacent channel rejection. The sharp bandwidth of the peak makes the adjustment very sensitive to drift. Q multipliers don't produce a null and peak as a single crystal filter does. In addition any suggestions as to which model, of the many that heathkit sold, would be, arguably, the best for this application..... If you can get some B+ and heater power from the receiver, the Heathkit QF-1 works well. There are other models with internal power supplies. These things are sensitive to power supply hum. It may help to decouple the Q multiplier power through a series resistor and another electrolytic cap. Bob in phx Frank Dresser |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message ,
Frank Dresser writes "bobinphx" wrote in message news:L6KCc.1254$Ph.98@fed1read06... To All, I just purchased a Lafayette kt-200 and research on the net says it has a jack for a Q multiplier. Further research on a Q multiplier shows that is some how acts like crystal filter, only variable and it appears that it can also boost poor signals??? Can someone give me a readers digest, not overly technical explanation of "how do it work" ????? I scanned this, not from the Reader's Digest, but from the 1964 ARRL handbook: The "Q Multiplier" is a stable regenerative stage that is connected in parallel with one of the i.f. stages of a receiver. In one condition it narrows the bandwidth and in the other condition it produces a sharp "null" or rejection notch. A "tuning" adjustment controls the frequency of the peak or null, moving it across the normal pass band of the receiver i.f. amplifier. The shape of the peak or null is always that of as single tuned circuit (Fig. 2-50) but the effective Q is adjustable over a wide range. A Q Multiplier is most effective at an i.f. of 500 kc. or less; at higher frequencies the rejection notch becomes wide enough (measured in cycles per second) to reject a major portion of a phone signal. Within its useful range, however, the Q Multiplier will reject an interfering carrier without degrading the quality of the desired signal. In the "peak" condition the Q Multiplier can be made to oscillate by advancing the "peak" (regeneration) control far enough, and in this condition it can be made to serve as a beat frequency oscillator. However, it cannot be made to serve as a selective element and as a b.f.o. at the same time. and how well does it work???? They work well, within their limitations. The peak bandwidth can be very sharp, but off the peak the curve slopes down more gently and doesn't provide a dramatic difference in adjacent channel rejection. The sharp bandwidth of the peak makes the adjustment very sensitive to drift. Q multipliers don't produce a null and peak as a single crystal filter does. In addition any suggestions as to which model, of the many that heathkit sold, would be, arguably, the best for this application..... If you can get some B+ and heater power from the receiver, the Heathkit QF-1 works well. There are other models with internal power supplies. These things are sensitive to power supply hum. It may help to decouple the Q multiplier power through a series resistor and another electrolytic cap. The OP may care to look up the 'Select-o-Ject' which was a modified 'Q-Multiplier' which could produce a notch. Mike -- M.J.Powell |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"M. J. Powell" ) writes:
In message , Frank Dresser writes "bobinphx" wrote in message news:L6KCc.1254$Ph.98@fed1read06... To All, I just purchased a Lafayette kt-200 and research on the net says it has a jack for a Q multiplier. Further research on a Q multiplier shows that is some how acts like crystal filter, only variable and it appears that it can also boost poor signals??? Can someone give me a readers digest, not overly technical explanation of "how do it work" ????? I scanned this, not from the Reader's Digest, but from the 1964 ARRL handbook: The "Q Multiplier" is a stable regenerative stage that is connected in parallel with one of the i.f. stages of a receiver. In one condition it narrows the bandwidth and in the other condition it produces a sharp "null" or rejection notch. A "tuning" adjustment controls the frequency of the peak or null, moving it across the normal pass band of the receiver i.f. amplifier. The shape of the peak or null is always that of as single tuned circuit (Fig. 2-50) but the effective Q is adjustable over a wide range. A Q Multiplier is most effective at an i.f. of 500 kc. or less; at higher frequencies the rejection notch becomes wide enough (measured in cycles per second) to reject a major portion of a phone signal. Within its useful range, however, the Q Multiplier will reject an interfering carrier without degrading the quality of the desired signal. In the "peak" condition the Q Multiplier can be made to oscillate by advancing the "peak" (regeneration) control far enough, and in this condition it can be made to serve as a beat frequency oscillator. However, it cannot be made to serve as a selective element and as a b.f.o. at the same time. and how well does it work???? They work well, within their limitations. The peak bandwidth can be very sharp, but off the peak the curve slopes down more gently and doesn't provide a dramatic difference in adjacent channel rejection. The sharp bandwidth of the peak makes the adjustment very sensitive to drift. Q multipliers don't produce a null and peak as a single crystal filter does. In addition any suggestions as to which model, of the many that heathkit sold, would be, arguably, the best for this application..... If you can get some B+ and heater power from the receiver, the Heathkit QF-1 works well. There are other models with internal power supplies. These things are sensitive to power supply hum. It may help to decouple the Q multiplier power through a series resistor and another electrolytic cap. The OP may care to look up the 'Select-o-Ject' which was a modified 'Q-Multiplier' which could produce a notch. Mike I thought the "Select-o-ject" was an audio filter. From Villard, if I'm remembering properly. I can't say I've ever seen any attribution for the origins of the Q-multiplier. Obviously, it's a step away from the regenerative receiver, but I've never seen anything about who first connected it to the plate of the mixer in a receiver for this purpose. Michael VE2BVW |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Michael Black
writes "M. J. Powell" ) writes: In message , Frank Dresser writes "bobinphx" wrote in message news:L6KCc.1254$Ph.98@fed1read06... To All, I just purchased a Lafayette kt-200 and research on the net says it has a jack for a Q multiplier. Further research on a Q multiplier shows that is some how acts like crystal filter, only variable and it appears that it can also boost poor signals??? Can someone give me a readers digest, not overly technical explanation of "how do it work" ????? I scanned this, not from the Reader's Digest, but from the 1964 ARRL handbook: The "Q Multiplier" is a stable regenerative stage that is connected in parallel with one of the i.f. stages of a receiver. In one condition it narrows the bandwidth and in the other condition it produces a sharp "null" or rejection notch. A "tuning" adjustment controls the frequency of the peak or null, moving it across the normal pass band of the receiver i.f. amplifier. The shape of the peak or null is always that of as single tuned circuit (Fig. 2-50) but the effective Q is adjustable over a wide range. A Q Multiplier is most effective at an i.f. of 500 kc. or less; at higher frequencies the rejection notch becomes wide enough (measured in cycles per second) to reject a major portion of a phone signal. Within its useful range, however, the Q Multiplier will reject an interfering carrier without degrading the quality of the desired signal. In the "peak" condition the Q Multiplier can be made to oscillate by advancing the "peak" (regeneration) control far enough, and in this condition it can be made to serve as a beat frequency oscillator. However, it cannot be made to serve as a selective element and as a b.f.o. at the same time. and how well does it work???? They work well, within their limitations. The peak bandwidth can be very sharp, but off the peak the curve slopes down more gently and doesn't provide a dramatic difference in adjacent channel rejection. The sharp bandwidth of the peak makes the adjustment very sensitive to drift. Q multipliers don't produce a null and peak as a single crystal filter does. In addition any suggestions as to which model, of the many that heathkit sold, would be, arguably, the best for this application..... If you can get some B+ and heater power from the receiver, the Heathkit QF-1 works well. There are other models with internal power supplies. These things are sensitive to power supply hum. It may help to decouple the Q multiplier power through a series resistor and another electrolytic cap. The OP may care to look up the 'Select-o-Ject' which was a modified 'Q-Multiplier' which could produce a notch. Mike I thought the "Select-o-ject" was an audio filter. From Villard, if I'm remembering properly. I can't say I've ever seen any attribution for the origins of the Q-multiplier. Obviously, it's a step away from the regenerative receiver, but I've never seen anything about who first connected it to the plate of the mixer in a receiver for this purpose. You may well be right! Please erase my comments from your respective memories. Mike |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bobinphx" wrote in message news:L6KCc.1254$Ph.98@fed1read06... To All, I just purchased a Lafayette kt-200 and research on the net says it has a jack for a Q multiplier. Further research on a Q multiplier shows that is some how acts like crystal filter, only variable and it appears that it can also boost poor signals??? Can someone give me a readers digest, not overly technical explanation of "how do it work" ????? and how well does it work???? In addition any suggestions as to which model, of the many that heathkit sold, would be, arguably, the best for this application..... Bob in phx Bob A Heathkit QF-1 Q-Multiplier should serve well, since the KT-200 (HE-10 factory wired version) both are designed for 455 kHz IFs. Good luck! That was my first ham receiver. Peter |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Noise and Loops Question | Antenna | |||
Stacking Distance Question. More Information | Antenna | |||
Stupid question G5RV | Antenna | |||
Seperation question???? thanks | Antenna | |||
Question about attenuators ... | Antenna |