Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a question about logging recorders that are used at police
headquarters for example to record communications. I understand that they record the audio received by the receiver from the mobile unit and they also record the transmissions made by the dispatcher on the local mic. How exactly is the logger connected to the radio system. Where are these two audio sources combined? There is no single connection in a typical radio transiver to get both the transmit audio and the receive audio. The reason I want this detail is to understand what happens when the dispatcher "talks over" one of the mobile units or a mobile units "talks over" the dispatcher. Is there any way that both audio signals can get recorded together? I understand in a typical 2 way radio transceiver, when it is transmitting, it cannot receive. But in a more complex system typically used for police communications that may involve multiple remote satellite voting receivers, are there any conditions where both the active Rx and the dispatchers mic audio might both get recorded on the logger together? Does anyone know the details of how a logging recorder is typically connected to a complex communications system? Is the dispatcher mic sometimes always recorded even when the transmit button is not pressed? thanks Mark WB2WHC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have absolutely no idea how loggers work in a police environment, but
years ago the broadcast station I worked at had a stereo (2 channel) logger.Seems to be it would be a simple matter to feed the transmit signal to one channel and the receive signal to the other. Otherwise, it would be a fairly simple matter to split the dispatcher microphone signal. Take one side of the split and feed it to a 2 input mixer. Split the receiver output and feed one side of the split to the other input. Take the output and run it into the logger. In a real world environment things would be a bit more complicated as you would probably want to do some signal processing, such as audio AGC, before recording. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have absolutely no idea how loggers work in a police environment, but
years ago the broadcast station I worked at had a stereo (2 channel) logger.Seems to be it would be a simple matter to feed the transmit signal to one channel and the receive signal to the other. Otherwise, it would be a fairly simple matter to split the dispatcher microphone signal. Take one side of the split and feed it to a 2 input mixer. Split the receiver output and feed one side of the split to the other input. Take the output and run it into the logger. In a real world environment things would be a bit more complicated as you would probably want to do some signal processing, such as audio AGC, before recording. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry McCarty" wrote in message ...
I have absolutely no idea how loggers work in a police environment, but years ago the broadcast station I worked at had a stereo (2 channel) logger.Seems to be it would be a simple matter to feed the transmit signal to one channel and the receive signal to the other. Otherwise, it would be a fairly simple matter to split the dispatcher microphone signal. Take one side of the split and feed it to a 2 input mixer. Split the receiver output and feed one side of the split to the other input. Take the output and run it into the logger. In a real world environment things would be a bit more complicated as you would probably want to do some signal processing, such as audio AGC, before recording. Jerry, thanks, I understand what you are saying that it CAN be done that way. My question is what IS typically done? Thelogger in question is a mono unit. Mark |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry McCarty" wrote in message ...
I have absolutely no idea how loggers work in a police environment, but years ago the broadcast station I worked at had a stereo (2 channel) logger.Seems to be it would be a simple matter to feed the transmit signal to one channel and the receive signal to the other. Otherwise, it would be a fairly simple matter to split the dispatcher microphone signal. Take one side of the split and feed it to a 2 input mixer. Split the receiver output and feed one side of the split to the other input. Take the output and run it into the logger. In a real world environment things would be a bit more complicated as you would probably want to do some signal processing, such as audio AGC, before recording. Jerry, thanks, I understand what you are saying that it CAN be done that way. My question is what IS typically done? Thelogger in question is a mono unit. Mark |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
"Jerry McCarty" wrote in message ... I have absolutely no idea how loggers work in a police environment, but years ago the broadcast station I worked at had a stereo (2 channel) logger.Seems to be it would be a simple matter to feed the transmit signal to one channel and the receive signal to the other. Otherwise, it would be a fairly simple matter to split the dispatcher microphone signal. Take one side of the split and feed it to a 2 input mixer. Split the receiver output and feed one side of the split to the other input. Take the output and run it into the logger. In a real world environment things would be a bit more complicated as you would probably want to do some signal processing, such as audio AGC, before recording. thanks, I understand what you are saying that it CAN be done that way. My question is what IS typically done? Thelogger in question is a mono unit. In some applications, there is a seperate receiver used for the logging recorder, which just records everything that goes over the air. The aviation guys normally do this, because they use AM which allows everyone to talk over one another without any capture effect. So you may have the control tower stepping over someone, and you want to be able to record that, so you use a seperate receiver from the main comm system altogether. The local police probably do not do this, since it is fairly expensive and the police, I am sorry to say, have tended to get the cheapest comm systems they possibly can. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
"Jerry McCarty" wrote in message ... I have absolutely no idea how loggers work in a police environment, but years ago the broadcast station I worked at had a stereo (2 channel) logger.Seems to be it would be a simple matter to feed the transmit signal to one channel and the receive signal to the other. Otherwise, it would be a fairly simple matter to split the dispatcher microphone signal. Take one side of the split and feed it to a 2 input mixer. Split the receiver output and feed one side of the split to the other input. Take the output and run it into the logger. In a real world environment things would be a bit more complicated as you would probably want to do some signal processing, such as audio AGC, before recording. thanks, I understand what you are saying that it CAN be done that way. My question is what IS typically done? Thelogger in question is a mono unit. In some applications, there is a seperate receiver used for the logging recorder, which just records everything that goes over the air. The aviation guys normally do this, because they use AM which allows everyone to talk over one another without any capture effect. So you may have the control tower stepping over someone, and you want to be able to record that, so you use a seperate receiver from the main comm system altogether. The local police probably do not do this, since it is fairly expensive and the police, I am sorry to say, have tended to get the cheapest comm systems they possibly can. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mark wrote: I have a question about logging recorders that are used at police headquarters for example to record communications. I understand that they record the audio received by the receiver from the mobile unit and they also record the transmissions made by the dispatcher on the local mic. How exactly is the logger connected to the radio system. Where are these two audio sources combined? There is no single connection in a typical radio transiver to get both the transmit audio and the receive audio. The reason I want this detail is to understand what happens when the dispatcher "talks over" one of the mobile units or a mobile units "talks over" the dispatcher. Is there any way that both audio signals can get recorded together? I understand in a typical 2 way radio transceiver, when it is transmitting, it cannot receive. But in a more complex system typically used for police communications that may involve multiple remote satellite voting receivers, are there any conditions where both the active Rx and the dispatchers mic audio might both get recorded on the logger together? Does anyone know the details of how a logging recorder is typically connected to a complex communications system? Is the dispatcher mic sometimes always recorded even when the transmit button is not pressed? thanks Mark WB2WHC Mark, most dispatch centers have radio systems consisting of muliple receivers that are scattered throughout a geographical area, referred to as "voting receivers".. These copy the "inbound" traffic from the field units, and route the traffic to the communications center where the dispatcher is located .. These receivers are connected to a comparator unit that selects the best quality audio from the best receiver and routes it to the dispatcher. The comparator looks simultaneously at all of the receivers on a specific channel in order to "vote" which is the best quality to hand off to the dispatcher.. When the dispatcher transmitts, their PTT is sent to the base transmitter.. At our agency, when the dispatcher transmits, the inbound traffic (if any)can still be copied by the dispatcher. The allows a police or fire unit to be able to be heard, and provide additional information to the dispatcher, even if the dispatcher is transmitting.. Such a system is usually referred to as full duplex. For our police radio systems, they are like many UHF amateur repeaters in that the field unit transmitts on a frequency 5 MHz higher than the base station transmitter does.. Full duplex allows the field unit to interrupt the dispatcher if they have something important to pass to them.. Hope this helps a little .. Patricia Gibbons - wa6ube Communications Services Manager City of San Jose ITD/Radio Program. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mark wrote: I have a question about logging recorders that are used at police headquarters for example to record communications. I understand that they record the audio received by the receiver from the mobile unit and they also record the transmissions made by the dispatcher on the local mic. How exactly is the logger connected to the radio system. Where are these two audio sources combined? There is no single connection in a typical radio transiver to get both the transmit audio and the receive audio. The reason I want this detail is to understand what happens when the dispatcher "talks over" one of the mobile units or a mobile units "talks over" the dispatcher. Is there any way that both audio signals can get recorded together? I understand in a typical 2 way radio transceiver, when it is transmitting, it cannot receive. But in a more complex system typically used for police communications that may involve multiple remote satellite voting receivers, are there any conditions where both the active Rx and the dispatchers mic audio might both get recorded on the logger together? Does anyone know the details of how a logging recorder is typically connected to a complex communications system? Is the dispatcher mic sometimes always recorded even when the transmit button is not pressed? thanks Mark WB2WHC Mark, most dispatch centers have radio systems consisting of muliple receivers that are scattered throughout a geographical area, referred to as "voting receivers".. These copy the "inbound" traffic from the field units, and route the traffic to the communications center where the dispatcher is located .. These receivers are connected to a comparator unit that selects the best quality audio from the best receiver and routes it to the dispatcher. The comparator looks simultaneously at all of the receivers on a specific channel in order to "vote" which is the best quality to hand off to the dispatcher.. When the dispatcher transmitts, their PTT is sent to the base transmitter.. At our agency, when the dispatcher transmits, the inbound traffic (if any)can still be copied by the dispatcher. The allows a police or fire unit to be able to be heard, and provide additional information to the dispatcher, even if the dispatcher is transmitting.. Such a system is usually referred to as full duplex. For our police radio systems, they are like many UHF amateur repeaters in that the field unit transmitts on a frequency 5 MHz higher than the base station transmitter does.. Full duplex allows the field unit to interrupt the dispatcher if they have something important to pass to them.. Hope this helps a little .. Patricia Gibbons - wa6ube Communications Services Manager City of San Jose ITD/Radio Program. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|