Dave Edwards wrote:

Is there a color you would more prefer?
I can delete the add and run it again with a different color background if
it
would be more to your liking!

It's just that that colour background, red, has come to be associated with a
seller of some dubious natu radiomart.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Point taken!
Thanks for the heads up!
No more red.
....Dave
"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Dave Edwards wrote:

Is there a color you would more prefer?
I can delete the add and run it again with a different color background
if
it
would be more to your liking!

It's just that that colour background, red, has come to be associated with
a
seller of some dubious natu radiomart.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"John S." wrote in message
oups.com...
Old Guy wrote:
"David" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 11:40:02 -0400, "Dave Edwards"
wrote:


See pics here....

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...rd=1&sspage n
ame=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&rd=1


Again, Amateur Bands only.

So post your diatribe to the group that gives a damn about your
comments.
Rec.radio.amateur....
is just fine for this.



Uhhh where's the diatribe.

I only read an observation that it only had ham bands. A serious
limitation....


I don't understand the purpose of the comment either??... Not a limitation
for hams interested in a vintage amateur receiver... My dad had one and his
comments were featured in QST. Now I know what it looks like.

73, Steve, K9DCI

"Dave Edwards" wrote in message
news
Point taken!
Thanks for the heads up!
No more red.
...Dave
"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Dave Edwards wrote:

Is there a color you would more prefer?
I can delete the add and run it again with a different color background
if itwould be more to your liking!

It's just that that colour background, red, has come to be associated
with
a seller of some dubious natu radiomart.
dxAce Michigan USA


Perhaps, but not knowing anything of this radiomart it is generally
meaningless. Note that "daniel s 13" responds not, therefore I suspect a
troll with on other outlet for frustrations.

73, Steve, K;9.D,C'I

Steve Nosko wrote:
"John S." wrote in message
oups.com...

Old Guy wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 11:40:02 -0400, "Dave Edwards"
wrote:


See pics here....

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...rd=1&sspage n

ame=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&rd=1


Again, Amateur Bands only.

So post your diatribe to the group that gives a damn about your

comments.

Rec.radio.amateur....
is just fine for this.


Uhhh where's the diatribe.

I only read an observation that it only had ham bands. A serious
limitation....



I don't understand the purpose of the comment either??... Not a limitation
for hams interested in a vintage amateur receiver... My dad had one and his
comments were featured in QST. Now I know what it looks like.

73, Steve, K9DCI


Old Guy must be off his meds again.

Dave Edwards wrote:
Point taken!
Thanks for the heads up!
No more red.
...Dave

Beautiful receiver, good luck with the auction.

Steve Nosko wrote:

Perhaps, but not knowing anything of this radiomart it is generally
meaningless. Note that "daniel s 13" responds not, therefore I suspect a
troll with on other outlet for frustrations.

73, Steve, K;9.D,C'I



Radiomart will purchase a radio on ebay, put it up for auction a week
later claiming he has had it in his collection for years, or has more
than one and is getting rid of the extras. He nearly always uses a red
background and photographs the object to make it appear much better than
it really is.

Thanks, I found that out, and have since gone out and purchased a few other
colors from the rag shop!!

"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
m...
Steve Nosko wrote:

Perhaps, but not knowing anything of this radiomart it is generally
meaningless. Note that "daniel s 13" responds not, therefore I suspect a
troll with on other outlet for frustrations.

73, Steve, K;9.D,C'I



Radiomart will purchase a radio on ebay, put it up for auction a week
later claiming he has had it in his collection for years, or has more than
one and is getting rid of the extras. He nearly always uses a red
background and photographs the object to make it appear much better than
it really is.