Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not picking on the "grunts" but the upper level would be hard pressed to
find the bathroom. -- Clif Holland KA5IPF www.avvid.com "Phil Kane" wrote in message ast.net... On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:26:51 GMT, Clif Holland wrote: The FCC is Reactive not Proactive. The latter would require thought. The latter requires commitment on the part of very high level management, all political appointees who do not understand what the agency does in the field nor why resources (personnel and equipment) should be expended on it. I say that as a long-retired FCC field enforcement manager who is not charmed by what the agency has become lately. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon |
#72
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Kane wrote:
I say that as a long-retired FCC field enforcement manager who is not charmed by what the agency has become lately. Hmmm....I probably have a notice here somewhere with your autograph ![]() Does the FCC still go after Novices with 40m harmonics falling out of band on 10 meters or has the freeband CB QRM covered up all of the violations? Just kidding. Well, no...not really. -Bill ex-WN4SXX |
#73
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "-=H=-" wrote in message ... Hi all, I shipped two boxes of amateur radio equipment yesterday from Lewisville, Texas to Cooper City, Florida. As always, I used FedEx Ground. Here's why: Two packages: (1) weight 33.60 lbs, size 24 x 21 x 16 inches, insured $900 (2) weight 13.95 lbs, size 22 x 22 x 14 inches, insured $100 FedEx Ground, delivery in 3 business days, cost $38.77 UPS Ground, delivery in 4-5 business days, cost $56.07 UPS would have charged $17.30 more than FedEx (that's almost 45 percent) and would have taken 1-2 days longer to arrive. To me, $17.30 is not a trivial amount of money. Something to think about next time you're shipping packages! 73, Dean K5DH AND UPS will destroy a cinder block, much less your valuable ham gear! "Reasonable Care" in handling is not in UPS's vocab! 73 Jerry |
#74
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I received a roll of guy cable (almost like a block of iron) today via
UPS and would you believe they damaged it. Nothing gets shipped UPS from this person. Jerry wrote: "-=H=-" wrote in message ... Hi all, I shipped two boxes of amateur radio equipment yesterday from Lewisville, Texas to Cooper City, Florida. As always, I used FedEx Ground. Here's why: Two packages: (1) weight 33.60 lbs, size 24 x 21 x 16 inches, insured $900 (2) weight 13.95 lbs, size 22 x 22 x 14 inches, insured $100 FedEx Ground, delivery in 3 business days, cost $38.77 UPS Ground, delivery in 4-5 business days, cost $56.07 UPS would have charged $17.30 more than FedEx (that's almost 45 percent) and would have taken 1-2 days longer to arrive. To me, $17.30 is not a trivial amount of money. Something to think about next time you're shipping packages! 73, Dean K5DH AND UPS will destroy a cinder block, much less your valuable ham gear! "Reasonable Care" in handling is not in UPS's vocab! 73 Jerry |
#75
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bill wrote: Mr Fed UP wrote: Other weasel words I have seen on many company names these days. Are LLC instead of INC or CO .... I found it to be the acronym for Limited Liability Company. Anyone know what this means for them to weasel out of being liable? Seems like most companies are going to similar labels. I don't want to be liable for nothing either, but Sheezzzz!!! Do we all expect to get shafted from every place we do business now? Any enlightenment appreciated. Any lawyers out there? Can they really do business and not be responsible for the services and products they sell? You're confusing liability for damages with liability between partners of a corporation. Same word, different context. Here's a brief explanation taken from the web. Liability Issues of a Limited Liability Company In a limited liability company, a member's legal liability is limited to his or her investment in the business. Generally, a member's personal assets are not at risk, but a member's personal assets may be at risk if any of the following occurs: * A member personally guarantees a business debt. * The form of business is found to be a sham (not properly formed or maintained). * A member becomes personally liable as a result of his or her own acts or conduct. Technically, an "LLC" is a modified form of a partnership. In a traditional partnership, *each* owner is responsible for _all_ the liabilities of the business. In an LLC, 'n-1' (at *most*) of the partners are 'limited liability' partners -- they have liability exposure only up to the assets they have invested in the company (subject to 'special case' situations like those mentioned above, whereby they may incur additional liabilities). The remaining partner (or partners) is a "general partner", and is personally liable for any/all things above and beyond the assets provided by the "limited" partners. A full fledged "Corporation" is a 'legal person' in and of itself. Assets of the shareholders (the owners of the corporation) are immune from claims against the corporation. Officers and directors of the corporation may have personal liability to the shareholders for acts as a corporation official. Persons acting "on behalf of" the corporation may end up with personal liability for their own actions or conduct, IN ADDITION TO the corporation's liabilities for those actions/conduct. An LLC is much simpler -- in terms of organizational structure -- than a full- fledged corporation, But it gives the 'limited' members "almost all" of the protections of a passive stockholder in a corporation. Basically, it is an attempt to give the 'small guy' most of the benefits of the real corporation, without burdening him with all the overhead that is necessary for a large business entity -- WHILE, at the same time, ensuring that there _is_ a "responsible party" to fall back on, in the event of claims against the business. From a customer standpoint, there is essentially "no difference" between dealing with an LLC, and dealing with a full-blown corporation. |
#76
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree. I shipped a 25 pound package to Rome Italy via USPS and the cost
was only $42.00. I was told that it would go air and be delivered within 5 days. Had confirmation from recipient in Rome in 4 days! -- Richard D. Reese http://www.wa8dbw.ifip.com "Simon" wrote in message ... Hi Can any US readers of this thread explain why Fedex or UPS is so popular compared with the much cheaper US Mail? Here in Australia Fedex and UPS offer a service, but few private individuals would consider using them due to high costs and the inconvenience when delivery is a problem if people are away at work. With normal post, we have post offices in all suburbs where undelivered mail can conveniently be picked up or items posted. I have never had loss or damage problems with ordinary mail to and from the US. Simon |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Cold Water Pipe Ground? | Antenna | |||
Grounding Rod | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
FS/FT Commercial VHF/UHF & Test Gear - Long List | Swap |