Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is an ARRL Frequency Measurement Test coming up in November and I'd
like to participate. I'd like to verify my receiving frequency with a frequency counter and wonder how to best attach that to my TS 830. Who has done these kinds of measurements and could give advice??? Uwe |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jaggy Taggy wrote:
There is an ARRL Frequency Measurement Test coming up in November and I'd like to participate. I'd like to verify my receiving frequency with a frequency counter and wonder how to best attach that to my TS 830. Who has done these kinds of measurements and could give advice??? Uwe About 30 years ago I qualified with my HQ-180A and an LM freq meter. Didn't need to hook anything together ![]() The problem with a counter and a TS830 is that there are various oscillators in the 830 that would all need to be summed together to get into the gnat's hair range. I really don't know how that could be easily done. I'm thinking old style using an oscillator like the LM/BC-221 or any good signal generator to beat against the signal and measuring THAT unit rather than trying to measure the 830. -Bill |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/21/05 11:04 PM, in article ,
"Bill" wrote: Jaggy Taggy wrote: There is an ARRL Frequency Measurement Test coming up in November and I'd like to participate. I'd like to verify my receiving frequency with a frequency counter and wonder how to best attach that to my TS 830. Who has done these kinds of measurements and could give advice??? Uwe About 30 years ago I qualified with my HQ-180A and an LM freq meter. Didn't need to hook anything together ![]() The problem with a counter and a TS830 is that there are various oscillators in the 830 that would all need to be summed together to get into the gnat's hair range. I really don't know how that could be easily done. I'm thinking old style using an oscillator like the LM/BC-221 or any good signal generator to beat against the signal and measuring THAT unit rather than trying to measure the 830. -Bill Bill, so you suggest to beat the signal the ARRL will transmit and then to calculate the signal frequency by using the published transmission frequency?? In that case I still would need to get the signal generators signal in my TS 830 to beat with the ARRL signal. I guess I could connect the signal generator to the antenna input. Do I see this right?? Uwe |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jaggy Taggy wrote: On 10/21/05 11:04 PM, in article , "Bill" wrote: Jaggy Taggy wrote: There is an ARRL Frequency Measurement Test coming up in November and I'd like to participate. I'd like to verify my receiving frequency with a frequency counter and wonder how to best attach that to my TS 830. Who has done these kinds of measurements and could give advice??? Uwe About 30 years ago I qualified with my HQ-180A and an LM freq meter. Didn't need to hook anything together ![]() The problem with a counter and a TS830 is that there are various oscillators in the 830 that would all need to be summed together to get into the gnat's hair range. I really don't know how that could be easily done. I'm thinking old style using an oscillator like the LM/BC-221 or any good signal generator to beat against the signal and measuring THAT unit rather than trying to measure the 830. -Bill Bill, so you suggest to beat the signal the ARRL will transmit and then to calculate the signal frequency by using the published transmission frequency?? In that case I still would need to get the signal generators signal in my TS 830 to beat with the ARRL signal. I guess I could connect the signal generator to the antenna input. Do I see this right?? Yes, but you certainly don't want a direct connection to the aerial. Connect the signal generator output to your counter, preferably using a "T-piece", so that you can plug a short length of wire into the 'T' to act as an aerial when you want to do the measurement. Then, let *everything* warm up for at least half an hour so that the temperatures stabilise in the equipment to reduce drift. Keep the signal generator a long way off the target frequency to begin with, then tune the receiver as accurately to the ARRL signal as you can, lock the receiver dial, and then tune the signal generator until you get a beat note followed by zero beat against the ARRL signal. (Turn the receiver BFO off when doing this, so you only have one beat note) . Read your counter at that point, and it should give you the exact frequency. The accuracy of your frequency measurement will depend on the accuracy and stability of the frequency counter, of course. Chris. -- "As a sysadmin, I suppose you're familiar with something called a 'worst-case scenario'?" "Isn't that what we call, "having a good day for a change"?" (Rik Steenwinkel and Graham Reed in the monastery) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/22/05 3:23 PM, in article , "Chris
Suslowicz" wrote: In article , Jaggy Taggy wrote: On 10/21/05 11:04 PM, in article , "Bill" wrote: Jaggy Taggy wrote: There is an ARRL Frequency Measurement Test coming up in November and I'd like to participate. I'd like to verify my receiving frequency with a frequency counter and wonder how to best attach that to my TS 830. Who has done these kinds of measurements and could give advice??? Uwe About 30 years ago I qualified with my HQ-180A and an LM freq meter. Didn't need to hook anything together ![]() The problem with a counter and a TS830 is that there are various oscillators in the 830 that would all need to be summed together to get into the gnat's hair range. I really don't know how that could be easily done. I'm thinking old style using an oscillator like the LM/BC-221 or any good signal generator to beat against the signal and measuring THAT unit rather than trying to measure the 830. -Bill Bill, so you suggest to beat the signal the ARRL will transmit and then to calculate the signal frequency by using the published transmission frequency?? In that case I still would need to get the signal generators signal in my TS 830 to beat with the ARRL signal. I guess I could connect the signal generator to the antenna input. Do I see this right?? Yes, but you certainly don't want a direct connection to the aerial. Connect the signal generator output to your counter, preferably using a "T-piece", so that you can plug a short length of wire into the 'T' to act as an aerial when you want to do the measurement. Then, let *everything* warm up for at least half an hour so that the temperatures stabilise in the equipment to reduce drift. Keep the signal generator a long way off the target frequency to begin with, then tune the receiver as accurately to the ARRL signal as you can, lock the receiver dial, and then tune the signal generator until you get a beat note followed by zero beat against the ARRL signal. (Turn the receiver BFO off when doing this, so you only have one beat note) . Read your counter at that point, and it should give you the exact frequency. The accuracy of your frequency measurement will depend on the accuracy and stability of the frequency counter, of course. Chris. Well Chris, thanks for your advice. The problem starts with tuning my receiver exactly to the frequency under consideration. I have a IC R75 and I just tried to tune in WWV without relying on the dial. The R75 has a reversal switch which switches between side bands. Switching back and forth until both pitches are identical should put me right on the carrier, or not?? Well, it is not easy if you try to be precise. When I had the best match I could achieve my dial was off by 15 Hz. Now the TS 830 does not have such a feature and I wonder how I am supposed to switch my BFO off. Does switching to TUNE do the trick?? Anyway, it is much harder to do this adjustment with the TS 830 than with the R 75. And looking at my old URM25D using my HP5384A frequency counter the error seems to mount. Even after warm up a slow drift of at least +- 30 Hz seems to be unavoidable. Combining all these errors and considering my operators error in zero beating the signal I should be lucky to get within +- 50 HZ OF the ARRL frequency. Maybe not too bad considering the equipment and the operator's experience, but quite an error nevertheless.... Uwe |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jaggy Taggy wrote:
Now the TS 830 does not have such a feature and I wonder how I am supposed to switch my BFO off. Does the TS830 have AM mode capability? And looking at my old URM25D using my HP5384A frequency counter the error seems to mount. Even after warm up a slow drift of at least +- 30 Hz seems to be unavoidable. Combining all these errors and considering my operators error in zero beating the signal I should be lucky to get within +- 50 HZ OF the ARRL frequency. Maybe not too bad considering the equipment and the operator's experience, but quite an error nevertheless.... Make as many measurements as you can and then average your own results, or find a numerical median of your own results. If you 'know' you've got a certain amount of drift in your counter or sig gen you can simply back out that number or a portion of it. Good luck! -Bill |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Chris Suslowicz ) writes: Yes, but you certainly don't want a direct connection to the aerial. Connect the signal generator output to your counter, preferably using a "T-piece", so that you can plug a short length of wire into the 'T' to act as an aerial when you want to do the measurement. Then, let *everything* warm up for at least half an hour so that the temperatures stabilise in the equipment to reduce drift. Keep the signal generator a long way off the target frequency to begin with, then tune the receiver as accurately to the ARRL signal as you can, lock the receiver dial, and then tune the signal generator until you get a beat note followed by zero beat against the ARRL signal. (Turn the receiver BFO off when doing this, so you only have one beat note) . Read your counter at that point, and it should give you the exact frequency. Further to Chris's suggestion, Bill, and you probably already know this, but for anyone who has never done it before, it helps a lot to adjust the strength of the signal generator output so that it is the same as the unknown signal. Then, the beat note will be most pronounced and easy to detect. I used this method for many years with a fixed output generator and a pot to ground, taking the signal from the pot's wiper and coupling it through a small value capacitor to the antenna and receiver input. With care I could adjust the generator's signal strength to match the unknown signal and get a very nice beat note. Got a published error of 2 hertz back in the early 1980s. .... Martin VE3OAT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|