Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve wrote:
How about offering these as kits? Maybe even offering them with or without tubes? If you're able to keep the cost low I think you have a shot. Steve I dunno, a company called Heathkit tried that and went belly up. Lazy senior |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How about offering these as kits? Maybe even offering them
with or without tubes? If you're able to keep the cost low I think you have a shot. A few years ago, somebody (Ghostmoon?) offered kits to make an "All American Five" five-tube AM radio. They were quite expensive, and the company did not last. Antique Electronic Supply (http://www.tubesandmore.com/ ) offers a few tube-based kits for various things. You could try phoning them and ask what sort of demand there is for that kind of thing in general. I suppose you would be competing with existing solid-state kits. If you Google around, you can find what's available and what it costs, etc. Regards, Phil Nelson |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lazy Senior wrote:
Gosh I must really bug you Lazy Senior I know for sure that this continuous BS is bugging ME and probably a lot of other people too. Drop it and let's go back to talking about BAs. Ron |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lazy Senior wrote:
Steve wrote: How about offering these as kits? Maybe even offering them with or without tubes? If you're able to keep the cost low I think you have a shot. Steve I dunno, a company called Heathkit tried that and went belly up. Heathkit didn't go belly up because kits were not profitable; Heathkit went out of business because their new owner had no interest in a kit company, but rather wanted the assets of the Zenith computer company. Heath continues to this day making security devices, lamp fixtures, and a number of other mundane products. -Chuck |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that Heathkit had to be put to sleep because the world had
changed and Heathkit slowly became irrelevant for many different reasons, some of them permanent, some of them not. If one keeps those reasons in mind while creating the business plan, then the only thing left to do is to determine a competitive price/performance point based on market research. My thoughts: 1) Kits are not realistic except in upper end niche markets such as Elecraft due to issues of customer support and liability. 2) I'm not thinking of making rigs capable of world-burning performance for DX chasing or contesting. Most people are appliance operators, sad to say and want to just hook up the rigt to power, antenna, and antenna and go. What I have in mind are gear capable point to point shortwave links, essentially cross-country rag chew, SSB for Generals and above, with CW thrown in for the Tech+ and above. 3) What I can think I can offer in gear is stable operation in abuse-proof enclosures at slightly higher power levels. Part of the way I can do this is to use 21rst century materials and manufacturing methods to implement mid-20th century mechanical requirements. 4) There are also a few natural advantages that tube gear has that semiconductors do not: tube gear is less likely to break upon exposure to dirty power, EMP, and bad SWR. 5) New tubes are still being made by Russia and China and this will quite likely stay that way for the forseeable future. Purists might turn thier nose up at using these tubes, but something workable could be made out of them for a reasonable price. 7) Also, the price of US manufacturing, and labor are just too high for anything other than creating a prototype. Basically I am creating a very useful toy, but only a toy, and will most likely need to import the manufacturing and labor. 8) I should only offer 80, 40, 30, 20, and 18 meters. I want to stay as far away from 10 meters as I can, due to possible use of hacked gear on 11 meters. I don't believe the audience for 160 is very large. More thoughts? The Eternal Squire |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron in Radio Heaven wrote:
Lazy Senior wrote: Gosh I must really bug you Lazy Senior I know for sure that this continuous BS is bugging ME and probably a lot of other people too. Drop it and let's go back to talking about BAs. Ron Beerbarrel, Uncle Pete, and Chuckee seem to have a grudge against me and wont stop. Every post I do they want to humilate me. And I never back from a fight.... If it bugs you - - ALL email clients have filters, use them and you wont have to read this crap. I use the filters all the time for FA and FS ads and also people I dont like to read. I havent filtered the above 3 jerks - yet. Lazy Senior |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh, I LOVED the Galaxy V mark II. It was the rig I grew up on! When
my folks got divorced when I was in college they stored it in a garage and it got rusted out completely. My second best choice is the Yaesu FT-101E or EE, I had the E rig in my first marriage but I lost it in the divorce and bankruptcy. I just got a Yaesu FT-101EE to reactivate the communications part of the hobby. I am a builder, primarly, and have been for decades. I beg to differ regarding tube gear being tempermental. Badly designed tube gear is certainly inferior to established solid state gear. But well designed tube gear (Collins class and some military) is better than most solid state gear. Success depends on a lot of factoris: electronic design, mechanical engineering, manufacturing methods and techniques, parts sources, pricing, and profit margin. The FT-101, Galaxy, Drake, and Swan are not $100 pieces of gear on EBay, they are more like $300 to $400 pretty consistencly. I think a fully loaded multiband fresh boatanchor should sell quite nicely for $199.95 it if offers compareable features. That would imply a wholesale price of about $100.00. That would imply that parts, labor, and other indirect costs should be somewhere between $50 to $80. I think I can get from Russia or China a single sweep tube plus a handful of smaller tubes for about $30. The rest would have to be chassis, discretes, power, labor, shipping, and customs. Now, if I market direct through the net rather than through a retailer, I think I could go self sustaining after a few build-sales cycles. If the people on this topic would be willing to be a focus group for the fresh boat-anchor of thier dreams, I would be quite grateful. The Eternal Squire |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh yes.. this I know. What a ham wants is the most miles to the
galleon, just like a car. But what is quality to a ham? Clear audio, no spurs, sharp passbands, and suppressed harmonics. Easy repair and replacement by self too, right? Plus ruggedness. Anything else? The Eternal Squire |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA Boatanchors: B&W 370 SSB adpt,Drake TR4CWRIT, NCL2000 More | Boatanchors | |||
FA Boatanchors: B&W 370 SSB adpt, Drake TR4CWRIT, NCL2000 | Swap | |||
It's a breeze as Fresh Air is voted best student radio | Broadcasting | |||
FS/FT: Assortment of Boatanchors! | Boatanchors | |||
Free Boatanchors | Boatanchors |