Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(trying to get this posted correctly, quite rusty)
Hi, I've just gotten my Central Electronics 20-A working nicely on cw into a dummy load on 3595 KHz using my one crystal. I've got a VFO 457 and VFO 458 that I'm wanting to begin using for my first time. I'm starting with the 457 and could use some help. Instead of a 0C3 tube the unit has a 0D3. Instead of a 1626 tube the unit has a VT135/12J5GT tube. The second 1629 tube has not been removed (no wire to top cap) The "Basic Modification of the BC-457, BC-458 or BC-459 as a VFO for Model 10 or 20 Multiphase Exciter for 12 Volt Operations" states at one point: "Remove the 1629 eye tube and also the 1625 located near the tuning shaft, Jumpers should be installed across the filament terminals of these unused sockets." I'm guessing having the second 1625 installed without a wire to the top cap might be just to provide the jumper across the filament terminal for its socket. I don't know where the 1629 eye tube used to be. I also wonder why the 0D3 and VT135/12J5GT are installed. I am thinking this VFO 457 was modified and working many years ago. This VFO 457 was hooked up to the 20-A when I got both units. Thanks for your help on the VFO 457 or any comments about the 457 vs the 458 since I will be trying to get both working but focused on the 457 for now. 73, Bill Bird KG0YJ Chesterfield, MO |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Q. Instead of a 0C3 tube the unit has a 0D3.
A. Just a different regulated voltage. No magic about voltage. In fact, the builder may have found that the different voltage may have offered better stability - or it could have been he had one on hand. Q. Instead of a 1626 tube the unit has a VT135/12J5GT tube. A. Should be an equivalent tube. No big deal. A triode is a triode. Q. The second 1629 tube has not been removed (no wire to top cap) A. You apparently mean the 1625 power output tube. Should not make much difference. Maybe the builder did not have a place to put it. The original BC-457 had tubes in filaments in series - parallel so it could operate on the aircraft 24 - 28 volts. Most hams converted the wiring to 12 volts by paralleling everything. I recall most conversions supplied a separate filament transformer, and as long as the voltage required is equal to the transfromer voltage, you are fine. Hint, if it worked once, and no one rewired it, it will still work - unless one of the components has died due to aging. All the BC-457 conversion does is to use the triode oscillator circuit as an external vfo. Output from the vfo is taken from the grid circuit in the BC-457. It is a very easy circuit to understand. For 80 and 20 meters, you use 5 to 5.5 MHz. For some of the other bands, you must multiply the frequency of the vfo. That was often done in the 1625 section. But, much of the operation of the CE was done on 80 and 20 and the fellow who installed it may not have gotten any further. Colin K7FM |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bill Bird wrote: (trying to get this posted correctly, quite rusty) Hi, I've just gotten my Central Electronics 20-A working nicely on cw into a dummy load on 3595 KHz using my one crystal. I've got a VFO 457 and VFO 458 that I'm wanting to begin using for my first time. I'm starting with the 457 and could use some help. Instead of a 0C3 tube the unit has a 0D3. Instead of a 1626 tube the unit has a VT135/12J5GT tube. The second 1629 tube has not been removed (no wire to top cap) The "Basic Modification of the BC-457, BC-458 or BC-459 as a VFO for Model 10 or 20 Multiphase Exciter for 12 Volt Operations" states at one point: "Remove the 1629 eye tube and also the 1625 located near the tuning shaft, Jumpers should be installed across the filament terminals of these unused sockets." I'm guessing having the second 1625 installed without a wire to the top cap might be just to provide the jumper across the filament terminal for its socket. I don't know where the 1629 eye tube used to be. I also wonder why the 0D3 and VT135/12J5GT are installed. From memory, the 1629 (magic eye) tube was at back left, an octal base crystal was fitted to the middle socket (the pair of these provided crystal calibration at 4.6MHz (on the 4 - 5.3 MHz unit), and the 1626 oscillator triode was in the right hand socket. If it still has the top case, the hinged flap has a mirror fitted over the 1629 position so that you can see the eye from the front of the unit. The 0D3 is just a regulator to stabilise the oscillator HT. Chris. -- "George Flynn told us at Ditto that he knew he'd been in fandom too long when he went to see THE SHINING and found himself evaluating the hotel's function space." --Richard Brandt |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the help Colin and Chris. The BC-457 is working fine. I'll put the
BC-458 on the shelf for now. Bill Bird KG0YJ Chesterfield, MO kg0yj at arrl dot net www.billbird.com Bill Bird wrote: (trying to get this posted correctly, quite rusty) Hi, I've just gotten my Central Electronics 20-A working nicely on cw into a dummy load on 3595 KHz using my one crystal. I've got a VFO 457 and VFO 458 that I'm wanting to begin using for my first time. I'm starting with the 457 and could use some help. Instead of a 0C3 tube the unit has a 0D3. Instead of a 1626 tube the unit has a VT135/12J5GT tube. The second 1629 tube has not been removed (no wire to top cap) The "Basic Modification of the BC-457, BC-458 or BC-459 as a VFO for Model 10 or 20 Multiphase Exciter for 12 Volt Operations" states at one point: "Remove the 1629 eye tube and also the 1625 located near the tuning shaft, Jumpers should be installed across the filament terminals of these unused sockets." I'm guessing having the second 1625 installed without a wire to the top cap might be just to provide the jumper across the filament terminal for its socket. I don't know where the 1629 eye tube used to be. I also wonder why the 0D3 and VT135/12J5GT are installed. I am thinking this VFO 457 was modified and working many years ago. This VFO 457 was hooked up to the 20-A when I got both units. Thanks for your help on the VFO 457 or any comments about the 457 vs the 458 since I will be trying to get both working but focused on the 457 for now. 73, Bill Bird KG0YJ Chesterfield, MO |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AB5S WT 05-235 Comments to FCC | Policy | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | Homebrew | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | General | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy |