Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Does anyone recall the basic specs for "Amphenol No. 621-685" coax cable? There are no other markings on the cable than that. It looks like RG-59 in size. Apparently Amphenol no longer make it and a Google search turned up nothing. Thanks for any info. .... Martin VE3OAT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you do not find the specs, you can simply measure the diameter of the
inner conductor and the diameter of the shield. Then you can calculate the impedance using the ARRL Antenna Handbook. Easy to do. 73, Colin K7FM |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Martin Potter wrote: Does anyone recall the basic specs for "Amphenol No. 621-685" coax cable? There are no other markings on the cable than that. It looks like RG-59 in size. Apparently Amphenol no longer make it and a Google search turned up nothing. Are you sure it's a coax cable? Strip it and see if you don't get lots of carbon black on your hands in the process. If so, it's a low-tribo noise cable and not good for RF. Amphenol made a bunch of different kinds. Amphenol has not made any cables for at least twenty years, though, so this is not recent production. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Potter ) writes:
Does anyone recall the basic specs for "Amphenol No. 621-685" coax cable? Thanks to Scott and Colin for your suggestions. It is indeed coax cable as I cut off one connector, somewhat crimping the inards in the process. It sure does look like RG-59 with solid dielectric and solid copper center conductor, although I don't have any of that to compare directly. Will have to unsquash it and make some accurate measurements. Thanks again, fellas. .... Martin VE3OAT |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Potter ) writes:
Does anyone recall the basic specs for "Amphenol No. 621-685" coax cable? Thanks to Scott and Colin for your suggestions. It is indeed coax cable as I cut off one connector, somewhat crimping the inards in the process. It sure does look like RG-59 with solid dielectric and solid copper center conductor, although I don't have any of that to compare directly. Will have to unsquash it and make some accurate measurements. Strip some. See if you get graphite on your hands. If you do, it's not RF coax. If you don't, measure it. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|