Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brattleboro, Vermont
Our local radio station, radio free brattleboro, is currently documenting community support to show the FCC that indeed, we have the "authority to operate" as granted to us by the public, who own the airwaves. We are a non-profit, non-commerical, 10 watt station with a mission to train local citizens in the art of radio broadcasting and the rights and responsibilities inherent to free speech. Our lawyers have advised us that since the FCC has not defined what "authority to operate" is, we can define it as community support. Since we webcast, you are our community too! Please click on this link to read our petition & register your (electronic signature) support for our project. http://www.petitiononline.com/07131998/petition.html Please note that this is for Non-Residents of Brattleboro, VT only, and only one signature can be registered per computer. If you've already signed, please take a few minutes to pass this along to your contacts who care about media reform and continuing to challenge the increasing homogenization of corporate media. You can check out our website at www.rfb.fm where you can access our streaming web signal and look at our program guide. More information on our current struggle to remain on air despite a recent visit by the FCC is available at www.ibrattleboro.com, and by contacting us at Thank you, Sara, "DJ Undahcovah" "It is time to move from being a passive consumer of media to becoming a co-creator in a movement which gives voice to the voiceless. If you can't communicate, you can't organize. If you can't organize, you can't fight back. And, if you can't fight back, you have no chance of winning." Stephen Dunifer of Free Radio Berkeley paraphrasing "Scoop" Nisker |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DJ UndahCovah wrote:
Our lawyers have advised us that since the FCC has not defined what "authority to operate" is, we can define it as community support. Since we webcast, you are our community too! 1. you can never have too many lawyers. get some more! 2. look at case law!!!!! MicroKind prevailed in the appelete court!! (look up the case file and read how they argued the case and why they prevailed in the appeals court). 3. Read up on the lost cases to.........understand what the arguements were and why they lost the cases. 4. read read read all case law on Pirate radio court cases!!!!!!!!!!!! 5. craft an argument (an original, one or the one Microkind used to temporarily previal)..................don't bother crafting an argument which has lost over and over in the courts (i.e. 1st amendment rights argument). 6. forget the 1st amendment!.............try for specific case law where the pirate previaled (again Microkind)(I think I remember that there was another (preacher in Indiana?) who gave the courts a good fight). 7. General appeals to Constitutional rights and precepts invariably fail in the real world courts. So using the 10th or 9th amendments is out.........................well.................. the tenth argument (i.e. municipality rights might be interesting). If you can get your mayor and city counsel to publically defend and endorse you that would be a good thing. goodluck........you will need it! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"DJ UndahCovah" wrote in message
... Brattleboro, Vermont (....snip...) We are a non-profit, non-commerical, 10 watt station with a mission to train local citizens in the art of radio broadcasting and the rights and responsibilities inherent to free speech. Yeah sure. One of the responsibilities inherent to all of our liberties is to respect and follow the existing laws. If you want to work for legislative change, that's fine....but you don't get laws changed by breaking 'em. I believe that "Radio Free Brattleboro" is run out of a urban youth center. Apologies if I'm incorrect about that, but if I'm not.....way to go; great example to set for these young people (NOT!) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our local radio station, radio free brattleboro, is currently documenting
community support to show the FCC that indeed, we have the "authority to operate" as granted to us by the public, who own the airwaves....Our lawyers have advised us that since the FCC has not defined what "authority to operate" is, we can define it as community support. Of course. We all know the FCC has never heard THIS argument before. If this is an example of the legal advice you're getting, fire them and get different lawyers....ones with communications law experience, who can tell you where you really stand legally. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No No...the US Government can only regulate "interstate commerce"
It there is no commerce, no comtrol go be a sheeple elesewhere "Mark Jeffries" wrote in message ... (DJ UndahCovah) wrote in message ... Our local radio station, radio free brattleboro, is currently documenting community support to show the FCC that indeed, we have the "authority to operate" as granted to us by the public, who own the airwaves. We are a non-profit, non-commerical, 10 watt station with a mission to train local citizens in the art of radio broadcasting and the rights and responsibilities inherent to free speech. Our lawyers have advised us that since the FCC has not defined what "authority to operate" is, we can define it as community support. Since we webcast, you are our community too! The "authority to operate" is the license from the FCC. Until you have that, you have no authority to operate--you're a pirate. The airwaves are sparse and that's why they have to be regulated. You may not like the way they're regulated or not regulated, but it's still the law. And because you're a pirate, you are ineligible to get an LPFM license--and considering that Vermont is an area that *didn't* lose its LPFM frequencies in the argument with the NAB and NPR over adjacencies, you very well could've received a legal LPFM license if you weren't waving the Jolly Roger. Congratulations, Long John Silver. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our lawyers
have advised us that since the FCC has not defined what "authority to operate" is, we can define it as community support. Since we webcast, you are our community too! Hey, I have seen judges get mad when people cite the constitution, so nothing like that is going to help you. If you are in court against the government, the government is going to win. If they say you have weapons of mass destruction, it doesn't matter if you don't, you will die. 1. you can never have too many lawyers. get some more! Lawyers only help when it is one citizen or company against another citizen or company. The side with the most expensive lawyer wins, regardless of who is right. But when fighting the government, lawyers will not help you, nothing can. If you cause too much problems, off to the concentration camps at Guantanamo Bay never to be heard or seen from again. 6. forget the 1st amendment!.... Might as well, the government has. 7. General appeals to Constitutional rights and precepts invariably fail in the real world courts. They get mad and threaten to hold you in contempt of court if you mention the constitution at all. goodluck........you will need it! Worthless. You will LOSE if you are up against the government. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|