Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
October 25, 2004
By Eric Hellweg CNN/Money contributing columnist Boston - The satellite radio business has been cranking up the volume these past few weeks. Sirius Satellite Radio struck first with its hiring of Howard Stern. That announcement pushed Sirius's stock up more than 15 percent. The stock has since settled back down a bit. Then last week the company's much larger rival, XM Satellite Radio, struck back: It announced that it would broadcast Major League Baseball games. (snip) The Wall Street Journal reported that XM paid several times Sirius's offer for MLB rights. (Sirius earlier paid $220 million for rights to broadcast National Football League games.) (snip) A funny anecdote leads us in: I went to the Patriots game a week ago (trying to distract myself from the Red Sox being down 3-0 to the Yankees at that point) with a friend who is a Sirius subscriber. During a break in the action, an advertisement for Sirius radio came over the loudspeakers, and my friend -- apropos of nothing more than perhaps the beer in his belly and the Pats doing well -- decided to stand up and scream "I have Sirius and I love it!" He was immediately approached not by security but by people who asked about the service and wondered if it was worth the $12.95 per month. Why is this incident telling? Because despite being around for several years, satellite radio has only recently jumped into the public consciousness, mostly because of the Howard Stern announcement. Love him or hate him, Stern is a radio powerhouse. In this relatively early stage in the satellite radio war, strong content plus promotion works. That can go a long way toward helping Sirius close the gap between its 700,000 subscribers and XM's 2.1 million. Sirius is already seeing a strong boost as a result of the Stern announcement, but this will pale in comparison with the number of consumers who will sign up for Sirius once Stern leaves analog radio in December 2005. Granted, Sirius is paying a lot to secure Stern, and when a company starts to justify a move by claiming that it needs to sway only 10 percent of Stern's listeners to pay for the deal, it's worrisome. That's fuzzy math. But Sirius could make back Stern's salary if he brings in 200,000 additional subscribers each year. And with a marquee name like Stern's, the self-proclaimed "king of all media" just may make it work. (see CNN/Money http://money.cnn.com/2004/10/25/tech...estor/hellweg/ for the full article) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|