Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Scott Dorsey wrote:
David Eduardo wrote: But they don't use it. In the last year, in the Mexico City, Guadalajara and Monterrey ratings, there was not one mention of SW broadcasts as being listened to.... out of a sample of about 50,000 persons. This means that SW reaches less than 0.01% of listeners in these cities with a combined population of over 35 million. Which brings to mind... whatever happened to the shortwave outlet of the college radio station in Mexico City? They were on the air just a few years ago. Try 6185 +/- 10 Khz. (Somewhere around there. Brain Fade...) --scott I think what will keep shortwave going is that it's fairly inexpensive to hang a small shortwave outlet off an existing station or network. Even if you are broadcasting primarily on a network of FM stations, hanging a small 1KW shortwave transmitter off your net adds fairly minimal cost and these days pretty low maintenance. It doesn't get you a huge audience, but that's okay. I think the 250KW powerhouses are doomed, though. Countries with a maritime audience, like Greece, will probably still target their nationals. Likewise Radio Australia and Radio New Zealand with their widely spread target populations on the islands. Mark Zenier Washington State resident |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Shortwave is actually experiencing a resurgence" | Shortwave | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Frequency & Schedule Resources that are available "OnLine" { Links / URLS } | Shortwave | |||
Too late for DRM on shortwave? | Shortwave | |||
I wonder... | Shortwave |