Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The truth is, however, that we are NOT at a similar point in the
deployment of HD. The NRSC only ratified IBOC a few months ago. Second, there were many more stations doing AM stereo at that point. Whereas AM stereo only required the addition of a chip and a few extra components, IBOC receivers require alpha-numeric displays, and other items. Since there isn't a huge demand for the receivers yet, they are making limited production runs. Just like DVD players, which started at $1000, and dropped to $50 over the years, the price of HD will come down. One year from now, the receiver prices will be much lower. There will also be a lot more stations running IBOC. I find it very interesting that people continue to compare HD to AM Stereo. The dynamics are very different, and the industry is much different. Funny enough, HD detractors mention price as the biggest problem. The truth is price is the smallest problem...that will fix itself soon. Anybody launching HD is doing so with an eye to the future, not expecting results today. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBOC and True Bilingualism | Shortwave | |||
Here is "Why" I am 'skeptical' about DRM and IBOC | Shortwave | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
The AM IBOC mess is yet to begin... | Broadcasting |