Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This doesn't really pertain to A.E. members, just radio operators in
general. Years ago, there was a 'Gentlemans Agreement' that AM'ers would operated on channels 30 and BELOW, and us SSB operators would run channels 31 and ABOVE and things worked out great for all ops. Too bad this 'agreement' has gone out the window these days! I mean...I've heard many AM'ers with BIG linears running as high as 27. 805 , with most of them running between channels 34-40 which is really counter-productive to any decent SSB DX. I actually talked to a guy tonight on channel 36 AM and told him that he should try LSB instead. Well, we went there and we talked for quite awhile. Seems he really didn't know too much about sideband, but after hearing all of the stations he LOVED it. Oh well...it seems that I've gotten one guy on track. I only have about a million more to go! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Dobbs EC42" wrote in message
news ![]() On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 04:15:15 +0000, A.E. 352 wrote: This doesn't really pertain to A.E. members, just radio operators in general. Years ago, there was a 'Gentlemans Agreement' that AM'ers would operated on channels 30 and BELOW, and us SSB operators would run channels 31 and ABOVE and things worked out great for all ops. Too bad this 'agreement' has gone out the window these days! Around here we have commercial trucking firms operated by Mexicans that use whatever channel someone selects when they leave the yard. -- Echo Charlie 42 San Diego, California We had a small cab company that tried using 11 meters for dispatch. Needless to say the locals put a stop to it by following them from channel to channel. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"A.E. 352" wrote:
This doesn't really pertain to A.E. members, just radio operators in general. Years ago, there was a 'Gentlemans Agreement' that AM'ers would operated on channels 30 and BELOW, and us SSB operators would run channels 31 and ABOVE and things worked out great for all ops. Too bad this 'agreement' has gone out the window these days! I mean...I've heard many AM'ers with BIG linears running as high as 27. 805 , with most of them running between channels 34-40 which is really counter-productive to any decent SSB DX. I actually talked to a guy tonight on channel 36 AM and told him that he should try LSB instead. Well, we went there and we talked for quite awhile. Seems he really didn't know too much about sideband, but after hearing all of the stations he LOVED it. Oh well...it seems that I've gotten one guy on track. I only have about a million more to go! We get a lot of that here too, especially from truckers. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Dobbs EC42 wrote:
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 04:15:15 +0000, A.E. 352 wrote: This doesn't really pertain to A.E. members, just radio operators in general. Years ago, there was a 'Gentlemans Agreement' that AM'ers would operated on channels 30 and BELOW, and us SSB operators would run channels 31 and ABOVE and things worked out great for all ops. Too bad this 'agreement' has gone out the window these days! Around here we have commercial trucking firms operated by Mexicans that use whatever channel someone selects when they leave the yard. ...and the truckers are usually running right behind each other with their squelch turned way up so forget about asking them nicely to move.. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave |