Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Jan 2007 04:20:43 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in . com: snip Most of that stuff is not RF related... No more than your "compressor". But then you didn't specify. and is older than dirt (tube audio compressor...LOL) You are way out of touch with reality on this one, Brian. Tube audio, ESPECIALLY the compressors, are some of the most desireable audiophile circuits on the market. The reason is because the sound that can't be duplicated by silicon. For at least ten years now many major audio equipment manufacturers have included some sort of tube audio in the line, and a few make tube preamps and processors almost exclusively. "Older than dirt"? Right. Sure. And your fourth-generation hacks are state-of-the-art. Most don't have any indication that you were the originator. Except that I posted them to my website, claiming them as my own, and you can't find them anywhere else, not on the net nor in any book. In fact, I posted much of the stuff previously on my website (back when I maintained a website). I'm kind of suprised that you didn't recognize it. Anyway, you asked and I provided. Now where's the schematic for your amp? Do you need more time to modify it so your "design" can't be recognized as a hack? Yet you're so vociferous in your attack of my RF amplifier design. Why is that Frank?... You know why, Brain. You're just trying to save face..... and making yourself look like a moron in the process. Honestly, I don't think you're a moron at all. Not everyone can grasp even the scant little bit of electronics you have learned. But you are trying to take the lazy man's path to engineering. It doesn't work that way, Brian. That's why you don't see hacker companies last longer than a few years, with most ending in bankruptcy (and sometimes in criminal proceedings). If that's your goal then hey, by all means, go for it! when you obviously have very little RF experience. LOL!!! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 4, 8:11 am, Frank Gilliland
wrote: On 4 Jan 2007 04:20:43 -0800, "Telstar Electronics" wrote in . com: snip Most of that stuff is not RF related...No more than your "compressor". But then you didn't specify. and is older than dirt (tube audio compressor...LOL)You are way out of touch with reality on this one, Brian. Tube audio, ESPECIALLY the compressors, are some of the most desireable audiophile circuits on the market. The reason is because the sound that can't be duplicated by silicon. For at least ten years now many major audio equipment manufacturers have included some sort of tube audio in the line, and a few make tube preamps and processors almost exclusively. "Older than dirt"? Right. Sure. And your fourth-generation hacks are state-of-the-art. Most don't have any indication that you were the originator.Except that I posted them to my website, claiming them as my own, and you can't find them anywhere else, not on the net nor in any book. In fact, I posted much of the stuff previously on my website (back when I maintained a website). I'm kind of suprised that you didn't recognize it. Anyway, you asked and I provided. Now where's the schematic for your amp? Do you need more time to modify it so your "design" can't be recognized as a hack? Yet you're so vociferous in your attack of my RF amplifier design. Why is that Frank?...You know why, Brain. You're just trying to save face..... and making yourself look like a moron in the process. Honestly, I don't think you're a moron at all. Not everyone can grasp even the scant little bit of electronics you have learned. But you are trying to take the lazy man's path to engineering. It doesn't work that way, Brian. That's why you don't see hacker companies last longer than a few years, with most ending in bankruptcy (and sometimes in criminal proceedings). If that's your goal then hey, by all means, go for it! when you obviously have very little RF experience.LOL!!! Frank, don't think many are fooled by your rhetoric. Have a nice day... www.telstar-electronics.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Jan 2007 06:53:31 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in .com: snip Frank, don't think many are fooled by your rhetoric. Have a nice day... Just remember.... 34 watts of distortion from an unmodulated carrier. You know what that means, Brian? It means that if, by some bizzare and unnatural circumstance, the sales of your amps actually takes off, you are going to have to deal with some mighty ****ed-off customers. Can you say, "Notice of Apparent Liability"? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:11:11 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote: +++You are way out of touch with reality on this one, Brian. Tube audio, +++ESPECIALLY the compressors, are some of the most desireable audiophile +++circuits on the market. The reason is because the sound that can't be +++duplicated by silicon. For at least ten years now many major audio +++equipment manufacturers have included some sort of tube audio in the +++line, and a few make tube preamps and processors almost exclusively. +++"Older than dirt"? Right. Sure. And your fourth-generation hacks are +++state-of-the-art. ********** Frank I agree some of the best high end audio is still produced using tubes. There are some distortion characteristics that bipolar silicon just can't get away from. FETs are better than bipolar, but are still lacking in some aspects. james |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Frank Gilliland wrote: On 4 Jan 2007 04:20:43 -0800, "Telstar Electronics" wrote in . com: snip Most of that stuff is not RF related... No more than your "compressor". But then you didn't specify. and is older than dirt (tube audio compressor...LOL) You are way out of touch with reality on this one, Brian. Tube audio, ESPECIALLY the compressors, are some of the most desireable audiophile circuits on the market. The reason is because the sound that can't be duplicated by silicon. For at least ten years now many major audio equipment manufacturers have included some sort of tube audio in the line, and a few make tube preamps and processors almost exclusively. "Older than dirt"? Right. Sure. And your fourth-generation hacks are state-of-the-art. Most don't have any indication that you were the originator. Except that I posted them to my website, claiming them as my own, and you can't find them anywhere else, not on the net nor in any book. In fact, I posted much of the stuff previously on my website (back when I maintained a website). I'm kind of suprised that you didn't recognize it. Anyway, you asked and I provided. Now where's the schematic for your amp? Do you need more time to modify it so your "design" can't be recognized as a hack? Yet you're so vociferous in your attack of my RF amplifier design. Why is that Frank?... You know why, Brain. You're just trying to save face..... and making yourself look like a moron in the process. Honestly, I don't think you're a moron at all. Not everyone can grasp even the scant little bit of electronics you have learned. But you are trying to take the lazy man's path to engineering. It doesn't work that way, Brian. That's why you don't see hacker companies last longer than a few years, with most ending in bankruptcy (and sometimes in criminal proceedings). If that's your goal then hey, by all means, go for it! when you obviously have very little RF experience. LOL!!! Keep laughing Frank... I never heard a dinosaur laugh before. www.telstar-electronics.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AMERICA IN DANGER: Secret Torture Rooms | CB | |||
AMERICA IN DANGER: Secret Torture Rooms | Antenna | |||
The Problem of Mixing Religion and Science | Antenna | |||
Remember the Fugs + tomatoes | Shortwave | |||
K8CPA Email | CB |