On 4 Jan 2007 04:20:43 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
. com:

snip
Most of that stuff is not RF related...


No more than your "compressor". But then you didn't specify.


and is older than dirt (tube
audio compressor...LOL)


You are way out of touch with reality on this one, Brian. Tube audio,
ESPECIALLY the compressors, are some of the most desireable audiophile
circuits on the market. The reason is because the sound that can't be
duplicated by silicon. For at least ten years now many major audio
equipment manufacturers have included some sort of tube audio in the
line, and a few make tube preamps and processors almost exclusively.
"Older than dirt"? Right. Sure. And your fourth-generation hacks are
state-of-the-art.


Most don't have any indication that you were the originator.


Except that I posted them to my website, claiming them as my own, and
you can't find them anywhere else, not on the net nor in any book. In
fact, I posted much of the stuff previously on my website (back when I
maintained a website). I'm kind of suprised that you didn't recognize
it.

Anyway, you asked and I provided. Now where's the schematic for your
amp? Do you need more time to modify it so your "design" can't be
recognized as a hack?


Yet you're so vociferous in your attack of my RF amplifier design.
Why is that Frank?...


You know why, Brain. You're just trying to save face..... and making
yourself look like a moron in the process. Honestly, I don't think
you're a moron at all. Not everyone can grasp even the scant little
bit of electronics you have learned. But you are trying to take the
lazy man's path to engineering. It doesn't work that way, Brian.
That's why you don't see hacker companies last longer than a few
years, with most ending in bankruptcy (and sometimes in criminal
proceedings). If that's your goal then hey, by all means, go for it!


when you obviously have very little RF
experience.


LOL!!!

On Jan 4, 8:11 am, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2007 04:20:43 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
. com:

snip

Most of that stuff is not RF related...No more than your "compressor". But then you didn't specify.

and is older than dirt (tube
audio compressor...LOL)You are way out of touch with reality on this one, Brian. Tube audio,
ESPECIALLY the compressors, are some of the most desireable audiophile
circuits on the market. The reason is because the sound that can't be
duplicated by silicon. For at least ten years now many major audio
equipment manufacturers have included some sort of tube audio in the
line, and a few make tube preamps and processors almost exclusively.
"Older than dirt"? Right. Sure. And your fourth-generation hacks are
state-of-the-art.

Most don't have any indication that you were the originator.Except that I posted them to my website, claiming them as my own, and
you can't find them anywhere else, not on the net nor in any book. In
fact, I posted much of the stuff previously on my website (back when I
maintained a website). I'm kind of suprised that you didn't recognize
it.

Anyway, you asked and I provided. Now where's the schematic for your
amp? Do you need more time to modify it so your "design" can't be
recognized as a hack?

Yet you're so vociferous in your attack of my RF amplifier design.
Why is that Frank?...You know why, Brain. You're just trying to save face..... and making
yourself look like a moron in the process. Honestly, I don't think
you're a moron at all. Not everyone can grasp even the scant little
bit of electronics you have learned. But you are trying to take the
lazy man's path to engineering. It doesn't work that way, Brian.
That's why you don't see hacker companies last longer than a few
years, with most ending in bankruptcy (and sometimes in criminal
proceedings). If that's your goal then hey, by all means, go for it!

when you obviously have very little RF
experience.LOL!!!

Frank, don't think many are fooled by your rhetoric.
Have a nice day...

www.telstar-electronics.com

On 4 Jan 2007 06:53:31 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
.com:

snip
Frank, don't think many are fooled by your rhetoric.
Have a nice day...


Just remember.... 34 watts of distortion from an unmodulated carrier.
You know what that means, Brian? It means that if, by some bizzare and
unnatural circumstance, the sales of your amps actually takes off, you
are going to have to deal with some mighty ****ed-off customers. Can
you say, "Notice of Apparent Liability"?

On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:11:11 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

+++You are way out of touch with reality on this one, Brian. Tube audio,
+++ESPECIALLY the compressors, are some of the most desireable audiophile
+++circuits on the market. The reason is because the sound that can't be
+++duplicated by silicon. For at least ten years now many major audio
+++equipment manufacturers have included some sort of tube audio in the
+++line, and a few make tube preamps and processors almost exclusively.
+++"Older than dirt"? Right. Sure. And your fourth-generation hacks are
+++state-of-the-art.
**********

Frank

I agree some of the best high end audio is still produced using tubes.
There are some distortion characteristics that bipolar silicon just
can't get away from. FETs are better than bipolar, but are still
lacking in some aspects.

james

wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:11:11 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

+++You are way out of touch with reality on this one, Brian. Tube audio,
+++ESPECIALLY the compressors, are some of the most desireable
audiophile +++circuits on the market. The reason is because the sound
that can't be +++duplicated by silicon. For at least ten years now many
major audio +++equipment manufacturers have included some sort of tube
audio in the +++line, and a few make tube preamps and processors almost
exclusively. +++"Older than dirt"? Right. Sure. And your
fourth-generation hacks are +++state-of-the-art.
**********

Frank

I agree some of the best high end audio is still produced using tubes.
There are some distortion characteristics that bipolar silicon just
can't get away from. FETs are better than bipolar, but are still
lacking in some aspects.

james

Hello James

I agree, some of the best audio reports I've ever had have come from tube
gear.

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 4 Jan 2007 04:20:43 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
. com:

snip
Most of that stuff is not RF related...


No more than your "compressor". But then you didn't specify.


and is older than dirt (tube
audio compressor...LOL)


You are way out of touch with reality on this one, Brian. Tube audio,
ESPECIALLY the compressors, are some of the most desireable audiophile
circuits on the market. The reason is because the sound that can't be
duplicated by silicon. For at least ten years now many major audio
equipment manufacturers have included some sort of tube audio in the
line, and a few make tube preamps and processors almost exclusively.
"Older than dirt"? Right. Sure. And your fourth-generation hacks are
state-of-the-art.


Most don't have any indication that you were the originator.


Except that I posted them to my website, claiming them as my own, and
you can't find them anywhere else, not on the net nor in any book. In
fact, I posted much of the stuff previously on my website (back when I
maintained a website). I'm kind of suprised that you didn't recognize
it.

Anyway, you asked and I provided. Now where's the schematic for your
amp? Do you need more time to modify it so your "design" can't be
recognized as a hack?


Yet you're so vociferous in your attack of my RF amplifier design.
Why is that Frank?...


You know why, Brain. You're just trying to save face..... and making
yourself look like a moron in the process. Honestly, I don't think
you're a moron at all. Not everyone can grasp even the scant little
bit of electronics you have learned. But you are trying to take the
lazy man's path to engineering. It doesn't work that way, Brian.
That's why you don't see hacker companies last longer than a few
years, with most ending in bankruptcy (and sometimes in criminal
proceedings). If that's your goal then hey, by all means, go for it!


when you obviously have very little RF
experience.


LOL!!!

Keep laughing Frank... I never heard a dinosaur laugh before.

www.telstar-electronics.com