Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Homac" wrote in message
om... You are right about CB I have seen more and more people with them again. It started in the 70s then died out, back in the late 80's then died out and now its back again??? Homac Happily, I can say they sure are. Particularly on channels 36 through 40 on SSB. Nice QSOs too. (Starting to hear more "QSX and standing by," rather than "QRT and standing by.") -- 73 de Bert WA2SI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just depends on how serious the user wants to be... and if they are using
radios for business and or personal communications. Most common people trying radios don't want to even think about them, its enough to figure out how to push the transmit button. So the simplicity and low cost of an FRS radio is the big deal. Only the shorter range keeps them from really becomming a lot more common place. If you want more range, you can easily apply for a business radio license which would give you 10 to 25 watts of power, more than enough for most short haul direct conversations. Notice some of the latest radios are combination FRS and GMRS Radios... drives a lot of GMRS repeater users crazy. ***** I have friends using CB for business... when the long path band conditions are wacky, a mutual friend in Mexico might have to relay a message back to the mobile which is only 15 miles from the base. Most people are not going to even try to bother with it. ***** FRS is popular, I can hear and talk back to a lot of users from a 2500 foot mountain top site. Put one of the silly simplex repeaters on the air from the same mountain and watch the fun begin. cheers skipp http://sonic.ucdavis.edu |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Skipp" wrote in message ... Notice some of the latest radios are combination FRS and GMRS Radios... drives a lot of GMRS repeater users crazy. My understanding is those so-called combo FRS-GMRS radios don't have the required PL tone generation circuits in them to activate repeaters. Plus they don't have any offset capability either which is also required to use a repeater system. And, I could be wrong here, but I thought that the GMRS repeaters you have to pay for access. They are not the free and open type of repeater you commonly find in Ham Radio V/UHF operations. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Saw this on a Tee-shirt: "I am a bomb technician if you see me running try to keep up " |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just a thought here. True the FRS units are a commodity (selling price near
the higher end throw-away cameras) and their range is limited, but they don't have to contend with skip. One possibility might be MURS. With a 2 watt limit and a much more efficient antenna than the 27 MHz units, these may make a lot of sense (especially if they get the prices down). I would expect 5 miles between handhelds on MURS (but then, I may be ever the optimist ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim "Homac" wrote in message om... The range on the average CB even the smaller "Walkie-Talkie" style is much better. FRS main advantage is it's much smaller size, however if you want to communicate reliably (more than 1 mile) a CB or 2m Amateur equipment is the way to go. You are right about CB I have seen more and more people with them again. It started in the 70s then died out, back in the late 80's then died out and now its back again??? Homac I want something which can communicate 2-3km and keep hearing how limited FRS radios are. I know CBs are starting to come back, is the range much better. Any help would be appreciated. Luigi --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 7/4/03 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... Just a thought here. True the FRS units are a commodity (selling price near the higher end throw-away cameras) and their range is limited, but they don't have to contend with skip. One possibility might be MURS. With a 2 watt limit and a much more efficient antenna than the 27 MHz units, these may make a lot of sense (especially if they get the prices down). I would expect 5 miles between handhelds on MURS (but then, I may be ever the optimist ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim Maybe over flat unobstructed ground (which is the optimistic way they rate distance anyway, but who lives at Bonneville Salt Flats?), but in the real world, usually a bit less. I have used MURS at the deer lease though, and in wooded and slightly hilly terrain, we were getting around 2 miles at near full quieting, with one watt and the tremendously inefficient rubber duck antenna. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim, do you know of any CB shops in the Massena, NY area? It don't matter
if it is in Canada. **************** "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... Leland, You are absolutely correct concerning the repeaters. The owners of the repeaters monitor them too. Someone doesn't pay, they get shut off in a hurry. When I worked in a shop, the move was up to trunking radio (800 MHz) where the radios had a digital id and it was much easier to control access. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 7/4/03 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunately, no. Any chance of looking in the white (or yellow) pages on
the internet (or locally, if that is where you are)? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim "Alan Lansburger" wrote in message ... Jim, do you know of any CB shops in the Massena, NY area? It don't matter if it is in Canada. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/10/03 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, but you *can* replace that antenna! A decent (yet still relatively
small) antenna plus an increase to 2 watts would yield a considerable gain. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim "Duh" wrote in message . .. "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... Just a thought here. True the FRS units are a commodity (selling price near the higher end throw-away cameras) and their range is limited, but they don't have to contend with skip. One possibility might be MURS. With a 2 watt limit and a much more efficient antenna than the 27 MHz units, these may make a lot of sense (especially if they get the prices down). I would expect 5 miles between handhelds on MURS (but then, I may be ever the optimist ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim Maybe over flat unobstructed ground (which is the optimistic way they rate distance anyway, but who lives at Bonneville Salt Flats?), but in the real world, usually a bit less. I have used MURS at the deer lease though, and in wooded and slightly hilly terrain, we were getting around 2 miles at near full quieting, with one watt and the tremendously inefficient rubber duck antenna. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/10/03 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message ...
My understanding is those so-called combo FRS-GMRS radios don't have the required PL tone generation circuits in them to activate repeaters. Actually, there are some... but, most aren't capable of transmitting on the repeater inputs, only the repeater outputs (this is how you end up with 22 channels on many of these hybrid FRS/GMRS radios). Plus they don't have any offset capability either which is also required to use a repeater system. There are a few that actually do - Motorola makes one; but, one would be much better off buying a "real" GMRS radio that didn't suffer from the integral antenna limitation. And, I could be wrong here, but I thought that the GMRS repeaters you have to pay for access. They are not the free and open type of repeater you commonly find in Ham Radio V/UHF operations. That is generally true. - Stewart |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ...
Yes, but you *can* replace that antenna! A decent (yet still relatively small) antenna plus an increase to 2 watts would yield a considerable gain. Also, higher quality receivers make a big difference. One never sees specs on the packages of FRS or GMRS/FRS hybrid receivers - but most of them have to be absolutely awful... manufacturers know that 99.9% of their FRS FRS/GMRS hybrid customer base couldn't understand receiver specs, even if they made them available. For most "real" GMRS, MURS, ham, or business radios, you will easily be able to find the specs - usually in the user's manual inside the package, or on a on-line spec sheet at the manufacturer's web site... fact is, I'd guess than more than half the ham Techs don't understand receiver specs. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim - Stewart http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MURS-OPEN |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sneaking tiny radios into North Korea | Broadcasting | |||
Comparison of six portable radios | Broadcasting | |||
export cb radios | Policy | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIO'S | Equipment | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIOS HT1000'S , VISAR'S ,& MAXTRAC'S | Equipment |