| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
July 11th 03, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: **Right here in the 'pile...an 'ol boy hammie was funnin' (?) around and jamming a repeater on 146.790 mhz,,,,,Feds told him he must "take immediate action" to make certain the database (which is public knowledge) contain his address where he reside, and not merely a contact address as he provided. Some hammies are sticklers for the rules. Some go to harassment levels, as seen by several hammie-lids and self-professed "AKCers" who come here to harass cbers Not CBers, Twist: Illegal operators. You lie. You and your ilk have accused cbers and hammies alike of being illegal or catering to illegals merely because of their topics. You most certainly have expressed your venom, and indeed, harassed legal, law abiding operators for their topic of choice. You most indeed hae attacked and harassed those for responding to a post you feel should be censored, merely because the content may offer informational instructions that when actually employed may break the law pertaining to cb or amps. Since you can not handle such adult topics with proper communicative technique, you should ignore that of which offends you instead of attacking the character of one who asks a question about a linear. Blah, blah, blah. Same old Twistedhed diatribe. And it's all true,,every word of it, Frankie. It's how you are viewed. Only in your twisted little mind, Twisty. No Frankie-lite,,in the minds of all present that you have needlessly attacked. Denial isn't a river in the Nile, old boy. This,,,is your life, Frankie-lite.... Hmmm... I thought you were going to quote my post where I say that it is my "MORAL duty and obligation to needlessly harass cbers". That's one way of attempting to get the light off your past harassment of those who speak of topics that dicombobulate you, such as amps and mods. _ Illustrating how weak you are in thought. Well? Well what? I said "may", It's there,..oh, what the hell....since you;re drunk as a sailor, here ya' go, Frankie-lite...you wrote: It is my legal right, moral responsibility, and independant choice to enforce any law I see fit to enforce. It is. Now where do I say that it is my "MORAL duty "Duty" and "responsibility" can, and often do, share the same definition. Run, run, run, Frankie lite, run like the wind to your semantic focuses...you are being forced to face your own behavior, so run, Frankie-lite, run to the land of enchanted semantics. and obligation to needlessly harass cbers"? You claim it is your right to enforce any law "you" see fit. Wrong. You are not a law enforcement officer and the law strongly discourages vigilantism. Vigilantism isn't necessary to enforce a law; all that is required is an active role in the enforcement process. And BTW, vigilantism is contrary to the entire system of justice we have, as it violates the rights of the accused, and is even expressly forbidden in statutory law in some local jurisdictions. You claim it is your "moral" responsibility. Imposing your interpretation of morality constitutes the harassment of those that do not share your views, ....or your "beliefs"... ,you can define "harassment' in any manner you choose,,for your examples, I point to the countless attacks you have made, unprovoked, the countless names you have called people, unprovoked, the continual badgering of those who hold you and your views impotent, and the misdirected anger and personal attacks of those who ask a question of a linear or mod. You are not the moderator and it kills you that you can not censor such speech. You have illustrated your frustration level many times, once by placing a call-to-arms for a "legal" cb only discussion group. Not only did you receive no takers, you were laughed away. Receiving no takers, and failing at censoring and intimidating those that speak of subjects that render you a quivering mass of jello, you resort to what you are about and that of wich you know best,,,,,the above mentioned behavior and what can most certainly be construed as.......harassing behavior...IE: harassment. Note all your posts are directed at others, most recently myself, but rarely does anyone give you the time of day unless you act out,,,its what childen do when they wish to receieve attention but do not understand how to go about it,,,,they react negatively. Yet another beaming illustration of the communication deficit that ails you and keeps you down. ,,,,,, Pot, kettle, black. Which begs another question: If I'm harassing CBers, and I happen to be a CBer myself, then I must be harassing myself; Nah. The term for what you do to yourself is "self-masochism". LOL! Is that the opposite of "self-sadism", or is it a type of "para-masochism"? Dunce. isn't that a conflict of interest, Trog? LOL,,I'll be anyone you want me to be, Frankie-lite, if it pleases you. I told you that once before,,try to retain it this time. _ Add to that, Frankie-lite,,your admitted lying against all you equate and ignorantly misconstrue as illegal, Who do you believe me to be THIS week, Trog? Freebanding isn't illegal? Using an amp with a CB isn't illegal? What country do YOU live in, Trog? Cuba? * Banality. HAHAHAHAHA!!! Why yes you do, Trog!!! It's most definately common knowledge that you are an anonymous, whiny, obsessed, bitter little freebanding troll with a warped sense of values and no sense of logic! ROTFLMAO!!! This is not all you misconstrued as illegal.... snip Get a life. ============= "...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both too small to admit it." ---- Twistedhed ---- ============= -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#3
July 14th 03, 03:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: =A0=A0From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: =A0=A0Right here in the 'pile...an 'ol boy hammie was funnin' (?) around and jamming a repeater on 146.790 mhz,,,,,Feds told him he must "take immediate action" to make certain the database (which is public knowledge) contain his address where he reside, and not merely a contact address as he provided. Some hammies are sticklers for the rules. Some go to harassment levels, as seen by several hammie-lids and self-professed "AKCers" who come here to harass cbers Not CBers, Twist: Illegal operators. You lie. You and your ilk have accused cbers and hammies alike of being illegal or catering to illegals merely because of their topics. You most certainly have expressed your venom, and indeed, harassed legal, law abiding operators for their topic of choice. You most indeed have attacked and harassed those for responding to a post you feel should be censored, merely because the content may offer informational instructions that when actually employed may break the law pertaining to cb or amps. Since you can not handle such adult topics with proper communicative technique, you should ignore that of which offends you instead of attacking the character of one who asks a question about a linear. Blah, blah, blah. Same old Twistedhed diatribe. And it's all true,,every word of it, Frankie-lite.. It's how you are viewed. Only in your twisted little mind, Twisty. No Frankie-lite,,in the minds of all present that you have needlessly attacked. Denial isn't a river in the Nile, old boy. This,,,is your life, Frankie-lite.... Hmmm... I thought you were going to quote my post where I say that it is my "MORAL duty and obligation to needlessly harass cbers". That's one way of attempting to get the light off your past harassment of those who speak of topics that dicombobulate you, such as amps and mods. _ Illustrating how weak you are in thought. Well? Well what? I said "may", It's there,..oh, what the hell....since you;re drunk as a sailor, here ya' go, Frankie-lite...you wrote: It is my legal right, moral responsibility, and independant choice to enforce any law I see fit to enforce. It is. Now where do I say that it is my "MORAL duty LOL...not even a decent stab..LOL.."Duty" and "responsibility" can, and often do, share the same definition. Run, run, run, Frankie lite, run like the wind to your semantic focuses...you are being forced to face your own behavior, so run, Frankie-lite, run to the land of enchanted semantics. and obligation to needlessly harass cbers"? You claim it is your right to enforce any law "you" see fit. Wrong. You are not a law enforcement officer and the law strongly discourages vigilantism. Vigilantism isn't necessary to enforce a law; No, it's not, but in your case, thats exactly what it amounts to. A perfect example is your calling another a criminal because of their topic of choice. all that is required is an active role in the enforcement process. Yes, Frankie-lite,,active, not REactive. Practice what you preach. You do nothing but REact. And BTW, vigilantism is contrary to the entire system of justice we have, as it violates the rights of the accused, You have wrongly accused many of being "criminals" because of their topic of choice, your ignorance and myopic view. and is even expressly forbidden in statutory law in some local jurisdictions. You claim it is your "moral" responsibility. Imposing your interpretation of morality constitutes the harassment of those that do not share your views, ...or your "beliefs"... You can name not one person who feels I have "imposed" my belief upon them,,LOL. If somehow, Frankie-lite, you feel I have "imposed" my "belief" upon your fragile psyche, your feelings of self-worth are even worse than initially thought. But back to your denial.......you do NOT have the right to enforce any law you see fit, if you so wish, I can fill your tiny mind with a myriad of examples where you do not have the right to "enforce any law you see fit". And you most certainly do not have the right to judge another and impose what constitutes your vision of morality upon them. Ironic how you claim such a right cocnerning morality, yet reduce yourself to foul language, obscenities, lies, repeated name-calling, and who knows how many other angry outbursts and insults. _ Frankie-lite, you can define "harassment' in any manner you choose,,for your examples, I point to the countless attacks you have made, unprovoked, the countless names you have called people, unprovoked, the continual badgering of those who hold you and your views impotent, and the misdirected anger and personal attacks of those who ask a question of a linear or mod. You are not the moderator and it kills you that you can not censor such speech. You have illustrated your frustration level many times, once by placing a call-to-arms for a "legal" cb only discussion group. Not only did you receive no takers, you were laughed away. Receiving no takers, and failing at censoring and intimidating those that speak of subjects that render you a quivering mass of jello, you resort to what you are about and that of wich you know best,,,,,the above mentioned behavior and what can most certainly be construed as.......harassing behavior...IE: harassment. Note all your posts are directed at others, most recently myself, but rarely does anyone give you the time of day unless you act out,,,its what childen do when they wish to receieve attention but do not understand how to go about it,,,,they react negatively. Yet another beaming illustration of the communication deficit that ails you and keeps you down. Pot, kettle, black. I don't act out Frankie-lite, Not one person present has ever claimed I needlessly attacked them, unlike yourself, save for the swine jewels of the voob's naming. Not one, Frankie. Now, back to forcing you to do the introspection, many can claim you have needlessly attacked them, Frankie,,,,the "pot-kettle-black" was but a mere autonomous canned response from you, akin to nervous laughter. There is absolutely nothing else you can say concerning the above mentioned behavior perpetuated by yourself upon this group......nothing. THIS..is your life, Frankie-lite. _ Which begs another question: If I'm harassing CBers, and I happen to be a CBer myself, then I must be harassing myself; Nah. The term for what you do to yourself is "self-masochism". LOL! Is that the opposite of "self-sadism", or is it a type of "para-masochism"? LOL..no, it's a type of algolagnia..IE: one who receives pleasure or sexual gratification, dependent upon suffering, physical pain and humiliation. You have indeed demonstrated you derive such pleasure from self-abuse. This is sort of the manner KC8LDO Lelnad derives his stated pleasures from "messing" with cbers. Kapish, Frankie-lite? Dunce. Oooh! isn't that a conflict of interest, Trog? LOL,,I'll be anyone you want me to be, Frankie-lite, if it pleases you. I told you that once before,,try to retain it this time. _ Add to that, Frankie-lite,,your admitted lying against all you equate and ignorantly misconstrue as illegal, Who do you believe me to be THIS week, Trog? LOL.....how about "Roger from WV?"..haha! Foghorn, Mr. K? LOL! Freebanding isn't illegal? Using an amp with a CB isn't illegal? What country do YOU live in, Trog? Cuba? =A0 Banality. HAHAHAHAHA!!! Why yes you do, Trog!!! It's most definately common knowledge that you are an anonymous, whiny, obsessed, bitter little freebanding troll with a warped sense of values and no sense of logic! ROTFLMAO!!! Bitter? I'm not bitter at anyone, Frankie-lite. I must admit, however, after your repeated flaccid attempts at personal character assassination, I take a sublime but guilty pleasure in watching you self-destruct and go insane. Do your self a favor to save yourself future embarrassment like you have demonstrated in this post,,,,,,,,, look up the word "banality". Once you have looked up the definition, you may then be so kind as to return it to it's proper context....you know, where it was a retort to your unorginal insult that you snipped in your reply. That man in the mirror is getting more stubborn with you day by day, eh, Frankie-lite? He feels he can make what he doesn't like, go away merely by sticking his head in the sand,,,pretending it doesn't exist,,,,,the ostrich-syndrome,,,,,no wonder you snip like a mad barber..you really hate being forced to reconcile with yourself...LOL. _ This is not all you misconstrued as illegal.... snip LOL. Get a life. Ah,,futile attempts at humor...lest you forget, Frankie-lite,,,'tis you that is in wait for my posts,,,'tis you on the "attack", Frankie-lite,,'tis you that initiates the maleficence, name calling, insults, lies, etc....twas no one but yourself, Frankie-lite, that is unhappy with their life. I'm quite content, and for reasons unkonown to all but those suffering severe communication deficits, your STATED goal (along with Lelnads) has been one of intended malice toward myself. Do you need to see that old post, too, Frankie-lite? "I never said I wouldn't troll anymore."..Frank Gilliland )" "I do not get upset about any CB law being broken."...Frank Gilliland ) "I choose to take a stand against illegal operators for several reasons"....Frank Gilliland ) "RF pirates affect me directly in my work."...Frank Gilliland ) "I have admitted to lying in this newsgroup, and on more than one occasion."......Frank Gilliland |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hammie told: "Get Your Addy Right" by FCC! | CB | |||
| Hammie told: "Get Your Addy Right" by FCC! | CB | |||
| Hammie told: "Get Your Addy Right" by FCC! | CB | |||
| Hammie told: "Get Your Addy Right" by FCC! | CB | |||
| Hammie told: "Get Your Addy Right" by FCC! | CB | |||
Linear Mode
