From: (Cool=A0Breeze)
If you are who you say you are, I will hedge you are contacted by the
FCC for supplying an incorrect address.
**********************************************
Who have I said I am? I have told you I am not
wa3moj, you tell me I am you call me george,

but
=A0
=A0wa3moj may be just a made up scree nic like

twistedhed.



But it's not, It's a valid call in the US. And you indeed did tell us
you were WA3MOJ.
_
From: (Cool=A0Breeze)
If you are who you say you are, I will hedge you are contacted by the
FCC for supplying an incorrect address.
**********************************************
Who have I said I am? I have told you I am not
wa3moj, you tell me I am you call me george,

but

=A0wa3moj may be just a made up scree nic like

twistedhed.


But it's not, It's a valid call in the US. And you indeed did tell us
you were WA3MOJ.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 09:37:32 -0500
From: "Jacques Strappe"
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
References:





Subject: Palomar 300A
Amp Help... Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:37:29 -0400 X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express
6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: Lines: 36
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.45.64.50 X-Trace:
sv3-kFYYIx4NS82uvuf5NH4rjFVWcTSuTTuSnb7PBwrMLZGYRuW1pU/rylF4UbLraRTlOh5cKk=
lHnrQPEdG!TIhRXDbQ8rEgkOdcIs5QQhntP1xSnYdAffDcMZS/qSFvfwMpGBrqEItnWtA=3D
X-Complaints-To: X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy
of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to
process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
"Randy" wrote in message
.. . "Phil D. Bucket"
wrote in message
...
Toll Free wrote:
Of course you do but you are a fan of illegal cb. And why were
these palomar amps never advertised in ham mags? Again proving
your nothing but a troll.
They where advertised. In most of the Ham radio magz of
yesteryear.
Toll_Free
OK if this particular Palomar amp is/was such a popular amateur amp
why can't you discuss it on QRZ or rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors or
other "non-CB" forum? Duh. The original poster won't give his
callsign, Skipp won't give his callsign, and neither will you.
Wonder why, LOL.
What's your call? Lead by example.
wa3moj.... who is next? perhaps you could get dickie boy cranium to give
us his next.

_
Gee,,KC8LDO Lelnad denies all involvment, then lies to the world about
his bignet account. YOU deny all involvment then lie about your call
sign. Once a liar always a liar. You're both a couple of lying lids out
here starting trouble,,it's why 12 yahoo accounts violating TOS were
puled in less than a week. You guys are nothing but trouble.

Easy solution to this problem.. If you think he's not WA3MOJ, write
the real WA3MOJ a snail-mail letter. If you get one back from him
denying any involvement with this newsgroup, then you have a 50/50
chance of knowing it's not him. If you get nothing back, you have a
50/50 chance of knowing it's not him.. That's 25% more than you knew
before.

Of course, if you send some newsgroup article printouts along with it,
and send two copies, one to WA3MOJ and one to Riley, then something
might get done about the situation.

Just a thought.

-SSB

Twistedhed wrote:
From: (Cool Breeze)
If you are who you say you are, I will hedge you are contacted by the
FCC for supplying an incorrect address.
**********************************************

Who have I said I am? I have told you I am not
wa3moj, you tell me I am you call me george,


but


wa3moj may be just a made up scree nic like


twistedhed.




But it's not, It's a valid call in the US. And you indeed did tell us
you were WA3MOJ.
_
From: (Cool Breeze)
If you are who you say you are, I will hedge you are contacted by the
FCC for supplying an incorrect address.
**********************************************

Who have I said I am? I have told you I am not
wa3moj, you tell me I am you call me george,


but


wa3moj may be just a made up scree nic like


twistedhed.



But it's not, It's a valid call in the US. And you indeed did tell us
you were WA3MOJ.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 09:37:32 -0500
From: "Jacques Strappe"
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
References:





Subject: Palomar 300A
Amp Help... Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:37:29 -0400 X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express
6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: Lines: 36
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.45.64.50 X-Trace:
sv3-kFYYIx4NS82uvuf5NH4rjFVWcTSuTTuSnb7PBwrMLZGYRuW1pU/rylF4UbLraRTlOh5cKklHnrQPEdG!TIhRXDbQ8rEgkOdcIs5QQ hntP1xSnYdAffDcMZS/qSFvfwMpGBrqEItnWtA=
X-Complaints-To: X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy
of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to
process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
"Randy" wrote in message
.. . "Phil D. Bucket"
wrote in message
...
Toll Free wrote:
Of course you do but you are a fan of illegal cb. And why were
these palomar amps never advertised in ham mags? Again proving
your nothing but a troll.
They where advertised. In most of the Ham radio magz of
yesteryear.
Toll_Free
OK if this particular Palomar amp is/was such a popular amateur amp
why can't you discuss it on QRZ or rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors or
other "non-CB" forum? Duh. The original poster won't give his
callsign, Skipp won't give his callsign, and neither will you.
Wonder why, LOL.
What's your call? Lead by example.
wa3moj.... who is next? perhaps you could get dickie boy cranium to give
us his next.

_
Gee,,KC8LDO Lelnad denies all involvment, then lies to the world about
his bignet account. YOU deny all involvment then lie about your call
sign. Once a liar always a liar. You're both a couple of lying lids out
here starting trouble,,it's why 12 yahoo accounts violating TOS were
puled in less than a week. You guys are nothing but trouble.

wrote in message
...
"Cool Breeze" wrote:
Gee,,KC8LDO Lelnad denies all involvment, then lies to the world about
his bignet account.

Did he tell you that in an email?


why you attributing that to me? Twisty made the comment.

sideband wrote:
Easy solution to this problem.. If you think he's not WA3MOJ, write
the real WA3MOJ a snail-mail letter. If you get one back from him
denying any involvement with this newsgroup, then you have a 50/50
chance of knowing it's not him. If you get nothing back, you have a
50/50 chance of knowing it's not him.. That's 25% more than you knew
before.

Of course, if you send some newsgroup article printouts along with it,
and send two copies, one to WA3MOJ and one to Riley, then something
might get done about the situation.

Just a thought.

-SSB

Not bad SSB, you could also write to Nancy as well.

--
GO #40 The Chuggernaught

sideband wrote:
Easy solution to this problem.. If you think he's not WA3MOJ, write
the real WA3MOJ a snail-mail letter. If you get one back from him
denying any involvement with this newsgroup, then you have a 50/50
chance of knowing it's not him. If you get nothing back, you have a
50/50 chance of knowing it's not him.. That's 25% more than you knew
before.

Of course, if you send some newsgroup article printouts along with it,
and send two copies, one to WA3MOJ and one to Riley, then something
might get done about the situation.

Just a thought.

While you're at it, send Riley copies of posts where Twirted
hints at harassing amateurs by using their callsigns on "freeband"
and filing wrong-address "nuisance" complaints with the FCC.

(anonymous acolyte) wrote:
While you're at it, send Riley copies of posts where Twirted
hints at harassing

Do they write you up for that now too? Someone isn't doing a
very good job of policing usenet then.

--
GO #40 The Chuggernaught

Nancy Drew?

::smirk::

-SSB

wrote:

sideband wrote:

Easy solution to this problem.. If you think he's not WA3MOJ, write
the real WA3MOJ a snail-mail letter. If you get one back from him
denying any involvement with this newsgroup, then you have a 50/50
chance of knowing it's not him. If you get nothing back, you have a
50/50 chance of knowing it's not him.. That's 25% more than you knew
before.

Of course, if you send some newsgroup article printouts along with it,
and send two copies, one to WA3MOJ and one to Riley, then something
might get done about the situation.

Just a thought.

-SSB


Not bad SSB, you could also write to Nancy as well.

sideband wrote in message igy.com...
Easy solution to this problem.. If you think he's not WA3MOJ, write
the real WA3MOJ a snail-mail letter. If you get one back from him
denying any involvement with this newsgroup, then you have a 50/50
chance of knowing it's not him. If you get nothing back, you have a
50/50 chance of knowing it's not him.. That's 25% more than you knew
before.

Of course, if you send some newsgroup article printouts along with it,
and send two copies, one to WA3MOJ and one to Riley, then something
might get done about the situation.

Just a thought.

-SSB

Twistedhed wrote:
From: (Cool Breeze)
If you are who you say you are, I will hedge you are contacted by the
FCC for supplying an incorrect address.
**********************************************

Who have I said I am? I have told you I am not
wa3moj, you tell me I am you call me george,


but


wa3moj may be just a made up scree nic like


twistedhed.




But it's not, It's a valid call in the US. And you indeed did tell us
you were WA3MOJ.
_
From: (Cool Breeze)
If you are who you say you are, I will hedge you are contacted by the
FCC for supplying an incorrect address.
**********************************************

Who have I said I am? I have told you I am not
wa3moj, you tell me I am you call me george,


but


wa3moj may be just a made up scree nic like


twistedhed.



But it's not, It's a valid call in the US. And you indeed did tell us
you were WA3MOJ.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 09:37:32 -0500
From: "Jacques Strappe"
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
References:





Subject: Palomar 300A
Amp Help... Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:37:29 -0400 X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express
6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: Lines: 36
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.45.64.50 X-Trace:
sv3-kFYYIx4NS82uvuf5NH4rjFVWcTSuTTuSnb7PBwrMLZGYRuW1pU/rylF4UbLraRTlOh5cKklHnrQPEdG!TIhRXDbQ8rEgkOdcIs5QQ hntP1xSnYdAffDcMZS/qSFvfwMpGBrqEItnWtA=
X-Complaints-To: X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy
of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to
process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
"Randy" wrote in message
.. . "Phil D. Bucket"
wrote in message
...
Toll Free wrote:
Of course you do but you are a fan of illegal cb. And why were
these palomar amps never advertised in ham mags? Again proving
your nothing but a troll.
They where advertised. In most of the Ham radio magz of
yesteryear.
Toll_Free
OK if this particular Palomar amp is/was such a popular amateur amp
why can't you discuss it on QRZ or rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors or
other "non-CB" forum? Duh. The original poster won't give his
callsign, Skipp won't give his callsign, and neither will you.
Wonder why, LOL.
What's your call? Lead by example.
wa3moj.... who is next? perhaps you could get dickie boy cranium to give
us his next.

_
Gee,,KC8LDO Lelnad denies all involvment, then lies to the world about
his bignet account. YOU deny all involvment then lie about your call
sign. Once a liar always a liar. You're both a couple of lying lids out
here starting trouble,,it's why 12 yahoo accounts violating TOS were
puled in less than a week. You guys are nothing but trouble.





or......you could go to a few of the podunk bars in allentown and go
in the men's room and write on the wall that georgre gives good head ,
then put his phone number on there........that would be a cool thing
to do , doncha know....

sideband wrote:
Nancy Drew?

::smirk::

-SSB

wrote:

sideband wrote:

Easy solution to this problem.. If you think he's not WA3MOJ, write
the real WA3MOJ a snail-mail letter. If you get one back from him
denying any involvement with this newsgroup, then you have a 50/50
chance of knowing it's not him. If you get nothing back, you have a
50/50 chance of knowing it's not him.. That's 25% more than you knew
before.

Of course, if you send some newsgroup article printouts along with it,
and send two copies, one to WA3MOJ and one to Riley, then something
might get done about the situation.

Just a thought.

-SSB


Not bad SSB, you could also write to Nancy as well.

Nancy Drew?

No, Nancy Busch.

--
GO #40 The Chuggernaught

"Twistedhed" wrote in
message

on.webtv.net...

Gee,,KC8LDO Lelnad denies all involvment, then
lies to the world about
his bignet account.

No lie Twirt. As I said I have never had a BigNet
account of mine. I'll let you ponder how that can
be true. Maybe you'll surprise me, but most likely
you're a bit too slow, IQ deprived, to figure it
out. Trying to explain it to you is a waste of my
time because it would be like trying to teach a
monkey to think. In fact I'll bet a monkey would
figure it out before you did!


--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

ARRL Member
NCI Member

Charter member of the
Lawrence Technological University
Wireless Society W8LTU
--
"Winners compare their achievements with
their goals, while losers compare
their achievements with those of
other people."

Nido Qubein