Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Randy" wrote in message ... And the clues are endless....George Is Innocent is Frank. I don't know who it is but I know who it isnt me, As noted your a lying bunch who accuses with no proof, and i told you it wasnt' me. Thanks for the clarification Randy. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Twistedhed) wrote in message ...
From: (Curious Dan) "Randy" wrote in message ... And the clues are endless....George Is Innocent is Frank. I don't know who it is but I know who it isnt me, You're a liar. You claimed (several times) who it WASN'T,,,,,your insanity prevents you from realizing such, but your claim leaves no doubt that the only manner you can know that another definitely didn't "do" something, is by knowing who did. Oh yea,did you give that user at the 68.45 addy permission to use the cal WA3MOJ,,you know,,when the user at that ISP claimed that was his call? smirk As noted your a lying bunch who accuses with no proof, and i told you it wasnt' me. Because you can't comprehend proof doesn't mean others are unable and share your plight. When you claimed another was innocent, it leaves no doubt there is only one manner in which you can make such a claim. Thanks for the clarification Randy. And thank you for yours. bite me |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: (Curious=A0Dan)
"Twistedhed" wrote in message ... From: (Curious Dan) "Randy" wrote in message ... And the clues are endless....George Is Innocent is Frank. _ I don't know who it is but I know who it isnt me, You're a liar. You claimed (several times) who it WASN'T,,,, ********************************************** Exactly you derilict I claimed it wasn't me and I claimed it above as Randy is one of the only one with a brain in this NG Well, a year ago you were accusing him of being a crack head. When he posts something you agree with, he suddenly "has a brain" aqccording to you..LOL. _ ,your insanity prevents you from realizing such, but your claim leaves no doubt that the only manner you can know that another definitely didn't "do" something, is by knowing who did. ********************************************** See above dickhead, Didn't take you long to go for the insults and homo references. Why not bring out your favorite term "assclown" while you're at it. Your preoccupation with men's privates and rears ia what you're all about. as usual your posting lies I never said "another" definiatly =A0 Nope,,you didn't use the word "definitely",,but you most *definitely* claimed you knew Lelnad was innocent. =A0didn't do it I said i didnt do it Are you denying saying you knew Lelnad was innocent a few weeks back? you jit stained Your preoccupation with men's rears, hom references, now coupled with sexual acts, noted. derilict retard. Maybe,,,but you're insane. I can be educated, you're a lost cause The only mnanner I care about is your false accusations you blamed me I said it wasn't me, everything else youpost about it is Bull**** like the rest of your thread. Keep reading for yet anotger lie you're caught in. Guess you missed me since your trolling my posts for replys. Nothing of the sort, When one lies intentionally, I'll call you on it,,,it's a pet peeve of mine,,just like pretending you have some radio authority is yours. _ Oh yea,did you give that user at the 68.45 addy permission to use the cal WA3MOJ ********************************************** I am the user of that ip and I never gave that callsign as mine sorry you lose again! , ,you know,,when the user at that ISP claimed that was his call? smirk ********************************************* He did? well thats news to me I never saw anywhere where he said hey I am wa3moj Who is "he"? As noted your a lying bunch who accuses with no proof, and i told you it wasnt' me. me more. Here's your proof: I claimed i was the one who was innocent you stupid ****ing dick with ears now go jerk off Well, after reading the following, you can "stop" jerking off, You're making a mess of yourself. NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 09:37:32 -0500 From: "Jacques Strappe" Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb References: Subject: Palomar 300A Amp Help... Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:37:29 -0400 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: Lines: 36 NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.45.64.50 X-Trace: sv3-kFYYIx4NS82uvuf5NH4rjFVWcTSuTTuSnb7PBwrMLZGYRuW1pU/rylF4UbLraRTlOh5cKk= lHnrQPEdG!TIhRXDbQ8rEgkOdcIs5QQhntP1xSnYdAffDcMZS/qSFvfwMpGBrqEItnWtA=3D X-Complaints-To: X-DMCA-Complaints-To: X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 "Randy" wrote in message .. . "Phil D. Bucket" wrote in message ... Toll Free wrote: Of course you do but you are a fan of illegal cb. And why were these palomar amps never advertised in ham mags? Again proving your nothing but a troll. They where advertised. In most of the Ham radio magz of yesteryear. Toll_Free OK if this particular Palomar amp is/was such a popular amateur amp why can't you discuss it on QRZ or rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors or other "non-CB" forum? Duh. The original poster won't give his callsign, Skipp won't give his callsign, and neither will you. Wonder why, LOL. What's your call? Lead by example. wa3moj.... who is next? perhaps you could get dickie boy cranium to give us his next. _ LOL..you shouldnt' post when drunk. It comes back to haunt you. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Curious=A0Dan) "Twistedhed" wrote in message ... From: (Curious Dan) "Randy" wrote in message ... And the clues are endless....George Is Innocent is Frank. _ I don't know who it is but I know who it isnt me, You're a liar. You claimed (several times) who it WASN'T,,,, ********************************************** Exactly you derilict I claimed it wasn't me and I claimed it above as Randy is one of the only one with a brain in this NG Well, a year ago you were accusing him of being a crack head. When he posts something you agree with, he suddenly "has a brain" aqccording to you..LOL. ********************************************** Randy has had his troubles with the white monster that is part of public record and at least he admits it unlike you a jockstrap sniffing douchebag lying ass sack of **** _ ,your insanity prevents you from realizing such, but your claim leaves no doubt that the only manner you can know that another definitely didn't "do" something, is by knowing who did. ********************************************** See above dickhead, Didn't take you long to go for the insults and homo references. Why not bring out your favorite term "assclown" while you're at it. Your preoccupation with men's privates and rears ia what you're all about. *********************************************** You are an assclown that's just telling the truth so if it has the word ass in it you freak out and think you are being molested, Your spending too much time around landfag LOL. as usual your posting lies I never said "another" definiatly =A0 Nope,,you didn't use the word "definitely",,but you most *definitely* claimed you knew Lelnad was innocent. =A0didn't do it I said i didnt do it Are you denying saying you knew Lelnad was innocent a few weeks back? you jit stained Your preoccupation with men's rears, hom references, now coupled with sexual acts, noted. ************************************************** ******** Your butt sniffing paranoia noted. Now go wash off. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nowgojer Koff" wrote in message (useless drivel snipped for sanity) My my George, haven't mentioned you for over a week now and you still want my attention. You would think with all the attention you are giving twist, you wouldn't have anymore love for me ![]() Landshark -- Try this, it made George famous: http://www.fishdot.org/furby/index.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|