Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Curious Dan wrote in message ...
"Brainbuster" wrote in message ... George Is Innocent wrote in message .. . Sorry I am not George Are you denying ever being in Allentown? Hahahahahahahaha. Yes it is comical, hahahahah he is 100% correct he is not george. Why are you replying for him? Are YOU denying ever being in Allentown? Hahahahahahahaha. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , "Brainbuster"
wrote: Keyclownz R Dopers wrote in message ... "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... 1. Prove that I made "anti-legal" posts to this group. You support twithed same thing No it is not. A defence lawyer stands up for people accused of crimes... even child abusers. Are they "anti-legal? Depends on their motivation. Why are -you- defending Twisty, Brain? How do I "support" him, send donations, send information to him... or is it just by not acting the asshole like you do? Aren't you supporting him by defending him in his absence? snip You made claims which you cannot back up with any proof, so you try to divert attention from your false claims. Not one straight answer to any of the requests for proof of your claims. You cannot back up one word of your false allegations and suggestions. You are the weakest link... Goodbye. And you watch too much TV. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyclownz R Dopers wrote in message
. .. "Brainbuster" wrote Keyclownz R Dopers wrote in message ... "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... 1. Prove that I made "anti-legal" posts to this group. You support twithed same thing No it is not. A defence lawyer stands up for people accused of crimes... even child abusers. Are they "anti-legal? You have been in Birmingham so long your head has shrunk to the size of a pea. Get that pastie out of your mouth and try and cognate properly for once you twit. Changing the subject and using childish insults still doesn't answer the questions or provide proof... it just demonstrates your frustration at the fact that your lies are so obvious and your attempts at deflection fail miserably. 6. Prove that I "support" Twistedhed. Why do you deny you make ass-sucking posts in support of Twisty? Where do I either deny or confirm this? Why don't you prove your accusations, rather than expecting people to lie to cover up your failures? Here, read this, **************************** From: Brainbuster ) Subject: Only idiots run 64 pills Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb Date: 2001-12-07 18:07:44 Hi Twistedhed. I still remember my schooldays, and how the boys who went round screaming that other boys were "gay" turned out to be the ones who really were "Gay". They probably hate what they themselves are, and have to try to justify their desires, and divert attention by claiming that others do it. ***************************** OK, I've read it... so what? You also post replies to his messages, far more than I do, giving him reason to post more... maybe you support him. Did you have to go 20 months back, and select something unrelated... or did that particular one hit a nerve? 2. prove that I have called you "WA3MOJ ". You refer to me as "george" who do you mean by that? Where do I call you George? 7. Show a post where I call you by the name "George". Do all people in birmingham behave like you do? I see, more diversions... the accusation of "calling you WA3MOJ" was changed to "calling you George and, now you cannot prove either, you just avoid it and attempt to change the subjet. Just provide the proof. Can you show the posts where I call you such names, or did you imagine it? as example: ******************************************* From: Brainbuster ) Subject: CB Outlaws Make ALL Radio Ops Look Bad Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb Date: 2002-02-14 00:14:35 Hamaholic wrote in message . com... Well noone to this day has been able to answer who George is, care to take a stab, or care to wager a few sheckles? === They have given an answer, several times. You must have a problem reading as well as spelling. Try the qrz site... WA3MOJ (George Busch). If I know that after less than a year on the group and not reading the group daily, then you should certainly have known it with the time you spend on here. Strange, but when you referred to the area you live in, it was the same town as listed for George Busch. So you have a better chance of knowing "who is George" than I do... 1000s of miles away. ************************************************* ** The question in that post was simply, who did people mean when they referred to "George"... so I answered it. Try learning English, I do NOT say that he is George, I just stated who people were referring to. Ah, but wait a minute... If this is meant as proof that I call YOU ("Keyclownz R Dopers") George, the person in question is the same as now calls himself "Curious Dan". So, by your own admission, you and "Dan" are one and the same person. Then who is the "george" you are referring to in 100% of your posts? #10 show that I mention "George" in 100% of my posts. Hell, you had to go back over 18 months just to find a post where I mention the name. Even then, I am not calling someone by that name. Once again, you place your numeracy and comprehension problems on display for all to see. You awlways reply 5 to my 1 I counted at least 10 of your replies so far Not to ONE of your posts. Every time you are caught in your lies, you try changing the claim. Stop avoiding it... show proof, or just accept that your lies are useless. Daft excuses make you look all the more like a twit. You are the one coming up with excuses, rather than proof. Stop trying to deflect the attention, where is your proof? You are following "george" right now in this thread Another admission that you and "curious Dan" are one and the same person. 5. Prove that I am a "Brummy". You mean that you cannot... so you accept that it was BS. Anyone can tell from your "humour" More diversionary tactics... still no proof, huh. Another to the list... 8. Prove that I have done that... show the evidence. You have no "list" just a tacky van job in the midlands, Still avoiding a direct reply, by changing the subject. Come on, where's your proof... Mr Rent-a-dick? You made claims which you cannot back up with any proof, so you try to divert attention from your false claims. What claims? Now you have problems with memory retention. OK, I'll help you out this once... but you really should write them down if your memory is that bad that you cannot remember what you said. You claim that I made "anti-legal" posts to this group. You claim that I have called you "WA3MOJ ". You claim that I posted 5 replies to the one message where you made that claim. You claim that I "follow George around". You claim that I am a "Brummy". You claim that I "support" Twistedhed. You claim that I call you by the name "George". You claim that I "proved" that I am a Brummy. You refuse to see the proof presented to you or your too dumb to see it. No, you fail to produce proof. Changing the subject and claims, and posting unrelated messages is proof of nothing except your lies. Does "setting foot" in Birmingham make someone a Brummy? Nobody asked if I had ever been to Birmingham in my life, so I have neither denied or confirmed such a thing. Bull. Only a brummy would answer the way you did. How do you know Brummies so well... unless you are one. You have still failed to show proof... Where do I say that I am a brummy? Does setting foot within Birmingham make someone a Brummy? If so, then setting foot within London makes someone a Cockney and setting foot within Liverpool makes someone a Scouse. How would you know about brummies being dishonest if you are not one yourself? How do you and your pals know about some of the people on this group being "Gay"... unless you are all Gays. I hate to say it but a majority of brummys are gay Once again, you claim to know so much about Brummies. By your own words, this shows you to be one. Or will you accept the lesser charge of hypocrite? and you bringing up homosexual themes I referred to your constant suggestions of that type... you are constantly suggesting that people are "gay", which you have provided the proof of, in your above response. You are digging a big hole for yourself... it's only a matter of time before you fall in. In a poll, 65% of children from such areas believe that crime pays. Maybe brummy children think that way. Maybe they do, but the poll was a national one and showed that in such areas a higher number of children thought that way. This would include other crowded inner city places. You have even worse areas in America... is there not gun crime on a daily basis? You even have snipers, shooting people at random. What was that Elvis song... Clean up your own backyard. You of all people would know about crime in birmingham. Hey, you are the one who constantly claims to know all about Birmingham and Brummies. You claim to know their sexual preference, their attitude, their humour, their favourite food, their typical job, their typical response... in fact, I would say that you seem to know them rather too well. What was that Brummy song? Do you not know where your crime hotspots are in America? Do you never see or hear the news? The brummy translator link is available for you should you need it. Will it translate English into a language you will understand? Only, you seem to be displaying a poor standard of English comprehension. So, tell us... do you know about crime hotspots in America, do you read or hear the news? No but YOU are proven to be a van driver and that is what counts. #11. Where is there such proof. I would ask you to post the proof, but I know that you will just change the claim to something else. If you do feel like it, maybe you could also prove that all van drivers are from Birmingham and all Brummies are van drivers. Let's just say that I will not be holding my breath while I wait for any of the above. The only thing you prove is your own stupidity and ignorance, you cannot even tell when someone is taking the p*ss out of you and your buddies. I suppose that must of hurt. Yes, the post was extracting the urine... and you posted it again just so we could laugh at you some more. No you need to tell the truth about your brummyness that is all. I have... your failure to accept the truth is your problem. What you want is for me to lie, so you will feel better... just swallow your pride and accept it, you cocked up. Your "tracking" methods were flored. Does Marks & Spenser have a psychologst on staff? You still need to answer the questions - provide proof of your claims. Your tactics of changing subjects, using insults, and avoiding real replies is not working. It may work on your fellow "Antis", but some of us can see right through you. Why are you replying for him? Are YOU denying ever being in Allentown? Who do you refer to when you say "george" Where do I call you George? The questions we Why are you replying for him? Are YOU denying ever being in Allentown? and why is allentown significant? The name and significance of Allentown has already been made clear. You even re-posted the message where I answered that one a long time back. And the reason I knew was because other people had previously made it clear. Why do you keep acting like you don't know? What are you hiding, by pretending that you don't know something which you clearly do? |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brainbuster" wrote in message ...
You still need to answer the questions - provide proof of your claims. Your tactics of changing subjects, using insults, and avoiding real replies is not working. It may work on your fellow "Antis", but some of us can see right through you. 1. You are a Brummie (born in, lived in, or reside in W. Midlands). 2. You are employed as a van driver for Marks & Spencer. 3. You eat pasties day and night. 4. You are likely gay. 5. You cheer on Twistedhed. 6. You author the rec.radio.cb humour page. 7. Your family is on the dole. Brainbuster get it through your head these are not insults they are facts and they have been proven time and again with evidence from your own posts. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyclownz R Dopers wrote...
5. Prove that I am a "Brummy". Anyone can tell from your "humour" Only a brummy would answer the way you did. Get that pastie out of your mouth You have no "list" just a tacky van job in the midlands, I hate to say it but a majority of brummys are gay Being a typical hypocrite, Keyclownz R Dopers also wrote... How would you know about brummies being dishonest if you are not one yourself? You seem to believe that you know plenty about Birmingham and Brummies, and go to great lengths to attack the area... what are you hiding, a Brummy past? Are you a closet Brummy, who moved because of the shame you felt? |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Gilliland wrote in message ...
In , "Brainbuster" wrote: No it is not. A defence lawyer stands up for people accused of crimes... even child abusers. Are they "anti-legal? Depends on their motivation. Why are -you- defending Twisty, Brain? Hi Frank. Once again... where am I "defending" him. I am being accused of things, so I am defending myself. Aren't you supporting him by defending him in his absence? Where am I defending him? If you look, you will see that someone said that there would be no trouble if there was no "Twisty". I am pointing out that they lied, the crap is continuing... they have just chosen different targets. In fact, they are even posting messages in an attempt to get "Twisty" to reply, just in case he is ignoring them. Not one straight answer to any of the requests for proof of your claims. You cannot back up one word of your false allegations and suggestions. You are the weakest link... Goodbye. And you watch too much TV. Actually, I watch very little. That is a very famous phrase, but I never get to see the program. I watch the soccer with my Son (I would not be bothered with it otherwise), but I don't have much time for TV. I'll admit to listening to the radio most of the time... you can work and listen, but TV demands your attention. So, why are you wading in, and helping Mr Dopers? I get the feeling that there is something that you are hiding. I don't see a reason for us to argue over the false claims that someone else has made... unless you care to let us know why you need to get involved. Brainbuster. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Keyclownz R Dopers wrote in message . .. "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... You still need to answer the questions - provide proof of your claims. Your tactics of changing subjects, using insults, and avoiding real replies is not working. It may work on your fellow "Antis", but some of us can see right through you. 1. You are a Brummie (born in, lived in, or reside in W. Midlands). Where's your proof, huh? 2. You are employed as a van driver for Marks & Spencer. Where's your proof, huh? 3. You eat pasties day and night. Where's your proof, huh? 4. You are likely gay. Where's your proof, huh? 5. You cheer on Twistedhed. Where's your proof, huh? 6. You author the rec.radio.cb humour page. Where's your proof, huh? 7. Your family is on the dole. Yep, you guessed it... where's your proof, huh? Brainbuster get it through your head these are not insults Oh, but they are... and very childish ones. You really need to grow up, and get a life. they have been proven time and again with evidence from your own posts. But they have NOT. You have been asked for your proof, many times, but refuse to provide any. Therefore, it is clear that you know you are spouting nowt but BS, but think that you can fool people with it. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , "Brainbuster"
wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote in message ... In , "Brainbuster" wrote: No it is not. A defence lawyer stands up for people accused of crimes... even child abusers. Are they "anti-legal? Depends on their motivation. Why are -you- defending Twisty, Brain? Hi Frank. Once again... where am I "defending" him. Well, gee Brain, I have no idea.... maybe because of your defensive posture in your replies to posts against Twisty.... or maybe because of all the excuses you are making for his absence.... or maybe by your shift from criminal defense lawyer to pleading ignorance with "where am I 'defending' him?" Actually, to me it sounded like you were attacking "George", using Twisty as a vehicle for the attack. So if your motivation was to attack and not defend, why even bring up the topic of defense lawyers? I am being accused of things, so I am defending myself. Go for it. Aren't you supporting him by defending him in his absence? Where am I defending him? If you look, you will see that someone said that there would be no trouble if there was no "Twisty". I am pointing out that they lied, the crap is continuing... they have just chosen different targets. In fact, they are even posting messages in an attempt to get "Twisty" to reply, just in case he is ignoring them. Just a few questions: Do you believe Twisty is gone for good? Do you think anyone else believes he's gone for good? And even if someone posts absolute proof that he will never come back, how long do you think it will take for the water to stop swirling after Twisty quits stirring the pot? When was the last time you saw the name Mark Fuller posted in this newsgroup? Or Professor? Or QRM2000? Or... etc, etc, etc. BTW, those are just rhetorical questions -- I'm sure you are already aware of human nature, and were just looking for a reason to attack "George". Not one straight answer to any of the requests for proof of your claims. You cannot back up one word of your false allegations and suggestions. You are the weakest link... Goodbye. And you watch too much TV. Actually, I watch very little. That is a very famous phrase, but I never get to see the program. Count your blessings. I watch the soccer with my Son (I would not be bothered with it otherwise), but I don't have much time for TV. I'll admit to listening to the radio most of the time... you can work and listen, but TV demands your attention. Twisty demands my attention, just like you demand the attention of "George". So, why are you wading in, and helping Mr Dopers? If I'm helping him, it's not deliberate. When you attacked him you defended Twisty. Twisty does not need a defense lawyer, especially since this is not a court of law. I get the feeling that there is something that you are hiding. My butt-crack. I've been hiding it ever since I lost my ass to patty-melts and onion rings. I don't see a reason for us to argue over the false claims that someone else has made... unless you care to let us know why you need to get involved. Perhaps for the same reason that you needed to get involved. Care to share that reason with us? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
HAHHA..poor Frankie. That obsessive compulsion disorder you suffer
really ****es you off,,,LOL. There's nothing you can do, Frank, except deal with it,,,oh, excuse me, you can't do that either,,,,LOL...all you can do is have MEMEMEMEMME on your mind in my absentia,,,,LOL. Poor Frank,,,,he get's depressed every year around the holidays..haha! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Twistedhed changes name to nicolai carpathia freebander | Policy | |||
TWISTEDHED POPS A GASKET | Policy | |||
TWISTEDHED SIGHTED IN TAMPA BAY | CB | |||
Twistedhed caught on tape, LOL :-) | CB | |||
WRC 2003 Condems Twistedhed | CB |