Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"(Scott Unit 69)" wrote:
Steveo wrote: $36.95 SP-5000 X-Terminator V, 1000 Watt Single Open air coil, 1/8" square Copper wire, 70 inch overall length. So anyway Tnom, is the above version ok or do have a recommendation? Don't buy it, Steve. Why not? |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() snip - Tnom used a radio modified for 'swang' and modulated it with a tone. snip Just a example of how you are making these statements up now. That's why you are an oxyMORON like I said earlier. |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
- Tnom did two tests. The first test used two receivers. If the variables of the test were constant, the readings should have been identical if not proportional. They were neither. In his second test he eliminated the second receiver because it was "not needed". In fact, they -are- needed because it's an empirical method of double-checking your work. snip Frank you are not only a oxyMORON but now you are a liar also. |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
- Field strength was not measured from a field strength meter, but from a commercial receiver, almost all of which incorporate some variation of AGC (Automatic Gain Control). IOW, the receiver's gain changes according to the strength of the signal. So for that reason alone the readings are not accurate. snip S-meters are not accurate and I never stated they were. The are very accurate in giving relative readings. |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() - Different antenna types and lengths will give different contours when mounted on the same vehicle; so while you might find a little gain in one direction, the other 359 degrees suck. Same deal with radiation angle, which will directly affect the range of the ground wave. Now I might ignore this issue if he had tested the antennas from the top of a flying saucer.... And in my setup the X-Terminator outperformed the 102"SS I never said it would outperform in any other setup because I never ran any other setup. - Probably the biggest problem with Tnom's "test" was that there was no impedance matching from the coax to the antenna. Loaded antennas usually have a lower feedpoint impedance, resulting in a larger mismatch (higher SWR). The problem here is that if the radio and antenna are not properly grounded (and a mag-mount is -not- a proper ground), the SWR meter isn't going to show that mismatch unless the meter is connected at the antenna feedpoint, which was not the case (and wouldn't have mattered anyway because the antenna was not properly grounded). He might have caught the problem had he measured and compared the forward power of all the antennas, but he didn't because he felt is was "not needed". And my setup was typical for a magnet mount. I never said it was anything different. Being a typical setup you would expect typical results. A typical result is the most accurate result for a typical setup. |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() - The antenna is ugly. Congrats.......You got something right. |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() $36.95 SP-5000 X-Terminator V, 1000 Watt Single Open air coil, 1/8" square Copper wire, 70 inch overall length. So anyway Tnom, is the above version ok or do have a recommendation? http://www.wep4hams.com/mobile_cb_antennas.htm http://www.geocities.com/mgo171/moviles.htm http://www6.mailordercentral.com/hye...ts.asp?dept=41 http://www.bills2way.com/equip/antennas.html I don't know if the 5000 is a performer or not. |
#70
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "(Scott Unit 69)" wrote in message ... You are wrong. "Landshark" wrote: Forge "(Scott Unit 69)" wrote in message ... Nope, you're not Scott. Try all you want, but you are forging his name, posting from AOL through put, using Ghostsearchers website. Landshark -- Hard things are put in our way, not to stop us, but to call out our courage and strength. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|