I do my power cords on a Les Paul!
Train

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
jim wrote:
Any folks out there remember the HR2510 club out of Mass? They had a
'bible' which covered all sorts of mods/upgrades of this fine radio.

I got a new power cord for one in the mail today.

From: (Train)
I do my power cords on a Les Paul!
Train
_
Yea? With a Peavey?

In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Train)
I do my power cords on a Les Paul!
Train
_
Yea? With a Peavey?


All flaming aside, anyone that plugs a Les Paul into a Peavey is either a total
imbicile or someone looking for a fight!






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Train)
I do my power cords on a Les Paul!
Train
_
Yea? With a Peavey?

All flaming aside, anyone that plugs a Les

Paul into a Peavey is either a total imbicile



You claim no flames, yet toss a name and manage to misspell
i-m-b-e-c-i-l-e.
Allow me...

or someone looking for a fight!

All flames aside, it appears you came to the game rather late in life.
Was a time in the not-so-distant-past where Marshal nd Peavey were it.
_

In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Train)
I do my power cords on a Les Paul!
Train
_
Yea? With a Peavey?

All flaming aside, anyone that plugs a Les

Paul into a Peavey is either a total imbicile



You claim no flames, yet toss a name and manage to misspell
i-m-b-e-c-i-l-e.
Allow me...

or someone looking for a fight!

All flames aside, it appears you came to the game rather late in life.
Was a time in the not-so-distant-past where Marshal nd Peavey were it.
_


Peavey's were cheap amps for people that couldn't afford a M-A-R-S-H-A-L-L. They
worked, but the spring reverb sounded like crap, and the boxes weren't built
that well, either. Peavey also used low-grade iron in their output transformers,
limiting the high-frequency response and taking the bite out of a nice set of
pickups. They made great ashtrays, however.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Train)
I do my power cords on a Les Paul!
Train
_
Yea? With a Peavey?

All flaming aside, anyone that plugs a Les

Paul into a Peavey is either a total imbicile

You claim no flames, yet toss a name and manage to misspell
i-m-b-e-c-i-l-e.
Allow me...

or someone looking for a fight!

All flames aside, it appears you came to the game rather late in life.
Was a time in the not-so-distant-past where Marshal nd Peavey were it.
_
Peavey's were cheap amps for people that

couldn't afford a M-A-R-S-H-A-L-L.


Umm,,in your haste, you forgot to nitpick over the missed key in the
next word, as well,
Also, your comment concerning people who "couldn't afford a Marshall" is
bull****, also, There are countless successful bands that used Peavey to
achieve a specific sound, especially when Bass was not a desired effect.




They worked, but the spring reverb sounded

like crap, and the boxes weren't built that well,

either.



I place this along the lines of those who always need to have a good
view of a band when attending a concert and those who bring their
binoculars and base part of their review on the visuals. Serious
audiophiles don't give a damn what something looks like...it's all about
the sound, man, the sound..

Peavey also used low-grade iron in

their output transformers, limiting the

high-frequency response and taking the bite

out of a nice set of pickups. They made great

ashtrays, however.


Many past (and I'm certain, present) successful international touring
acts prove such a statement totally incorrect. Some musicians are
millionaires many times over, yet remain with Peavey. Like manufacturers
of cars, all have their fans. You never saw the "Peavey Page".

-----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----=3D=3D

"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
From: (Train)
I do my power cords on a Les Paul!
Train
_
Yea? With a Peavey?


Fender Twin 100 watt is my favorite right now. I have a Marshall JCM 2000
Dual Super Lead but the Fender just blows it away. Use a little Marshall G10
MKII for playing in the house. Digitech GFX 1 Twin Tube for effects.
Anyone got a Gibson SG (with bound neck) they'd like to part with??
Train

In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:

snip
Peavey's were cheap amps for people that

couldn't afford a M-A-R-S-H-A-L-L.


Umm,,in your haste, you forgot to nitpick over the missed key in the
next word, as well,

No, Dave, I didn't "forget", I just didn't think it was worth the effort. In
fact, I didn't think that you nitpicking -my- spelling was worth the effort, but
then I don't share your neuroses.

Also, your comment concerning people who "couldn't afford a Marshall" is
bull****,

I suppose there were some people that bought one because they were naive, or as
a practice amp for their kids, or because of a pushy salesman......

also, There are countless successful bands that used Peavey to
achieve a specific sound, especially when Bass was not a desired effect.

For example....?


They worked, but the spring reverb sounded

like crap, and the boxes weren't built that well,

either.



I place this along the lines of those who always need to have a good
view of a band when attending a concert and those who bring their
binoculars and base part of their review on the visuals. Serious
audiophiles don't give a damn what something looks like...it's all about
the sound, man, the sound..

Where did I say anything relating to aesthetics? I didn't. The boxes were built
with unseasoned wood that often cracked, making the amp sound even worse. And if
the wood didn't crack you had to tighten the screws every other month until the
holes stripped out, which didn't take long because the screws were short and
didn't have much thread. They were built for economy, not quality.


Peavey also used low-grade iron in

their output transformers, limiting the

high-frequency response and taking the bite

out of a nice set of pickups. They made great

ashtrays, however.


Many past (and I'm certain, present) successful international touring
acts prove such a statement totally incorrect.

For example.....?


Some musicians are
millionaires many times over, yet remain with Peavey.

For example.....?


Like manufacturers
of cars, all have their fans. You never saw the "Peavey Page".

I have no doubt that the Yugo, the Bar-Kays, and Centralia, PA all have their
die-hard fans. What's your point, Dave?








-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Steveo wrote:
wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
jim wrote:
Any folks out there remember the HR2510 club out of Mass? They had
a 'bible' which covered all sorts of mods/upgrades of this fine
radio.

I got a new power cord for one in the mail today.

I've actually got a chipswitch manual,
also a power cord ;-).

Landshark

I should of asked you first. damn

Update. The guy at http://www.kenselectronics.com/index.html ,
sent me a new one for a fair price.

/advertising

Frank Gilliland wrote in message . ..
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Train)
I do my power cords on a Les Paul!
Train
_
Yea? With a Peavey?

All flaming aside, anyone that plugs a Les

Paul into a Peavey is either a total imbicile



You claim no flames, yet toss a name and manage to misspell
i-m-b-e-c-i-l-e.
Allow me...

or someone looking for a fight!

All flames aside, it appears you came to the game rather late in life.
Was a time in the not-so-distant-past where Marshal nd Peavey were it.
_


Peavey's were cheap amps for people that couldn't afford a M-A-R-S-H-A-L-L. They
worked, but the spring reverb sounded like crap, and the boxes weren't built
that well, either. Peavey also used low-grade iron in their output transformers,
limiting the high-frequency response and taking the bite out of a nice set of
pickups. They made great ashtrays, however.

All "spring reverbs" sounded like crap.

BTW: I've used a Peavey mixer and it worked fine. And back in the day,
most US groups had no high-end unless they had big contracts with the
recording companies. Wouldn't know about the "great ashtrays" part
since I don't smoke.