wrote:
Are you saying DouGay post is a normal post
from a normal person?

NO!

In , wrote:


The mere posting of this shows the authors latent
leanings towards his own perverted wishes.


And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of homosexuality?


Oh, I sorry. I didn't want to step on your toes. I'll refer to you the
next time

How were you stepping on my toes?

You seemed to have a problem with me stating the obvious about DouGay.
Therefore I assumed you were jealous of my response because you wanted
to come out with an explanation before I did.

If that's not the reason for you questioning the accuracy of my
response then what is? Are you saying DouGay post is a normal post
from a normal person?


I never even suggested it. But -you- were saying he must be gay because he
always talks about the subject. Is there some sort of psychological precedent or
research that supports your argument?









-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , wrote:
The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his
own perverted wishes.
And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of
homosexuality?
Oh, I sorry. I didn't want to step on your toes. I'll refer to you the
next time
How were you stepping on my toes?
You seemed to have a problem with me stating the obvious about DouGay.
Therefore I assumed you were jealous of my response because you wanted
to come out with an explanation before I did.
If that's not the reason for you questioning the accuracy of my response
then what is? Are you saying DouGay post is a normal post from a normal
person?

I never even suggested it. But -you- were

saying he must be gay because he always

talks about the subject.


LOL....yes. See, you can learn when forced. Hold on tight,,I'm about to
fill your skullcap.

Is there some sort of psychological precedent
or research that supports your argument?
-----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----=3D=3D
Yes. Freud. He compared it to ice cream. A slow, learning impaired child
with a subpar IQ who loves ice cream, may take to involuntary insertion
and mentioning "ice cream" in parts of their speech where it most
certainly doesn't fit and makes no sense. Freud claimed the same flawed
behavioral "tick" is responsible for the sexually deranged and
obsessed.....that involuntary sexual speech, most notable
homophobic/homosexual, and sex as relates to a mother figure, is the
subjects most innate desire. This information is available to anyone who
wishes to take the time and do a casual search of Freud and his works
relating to the sexual and biological conditioning of prepubescents and
how they digress (get worse over time). In other words, Freud holds that
such sicknesses are incurable and get
worse, not better with time as some believe.

In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
In , wrote:
The mere posting of this shows the authors latent leanings towards his
own perverted wishes.
And just how did you become an expert on the psychology of
homosexuality?
Oh, I sorry. I didn't want to step on your toes. I'll refer to you the
next time
How were you stepping on my toes?
You seemed to have a problem with me stating the obvious about DouGay.
Therefore I assumed you were jealous of my response because you wanted
to come out with an explanation before I did.
If that's not the reason for you questioning the accuracy of my response
then what is? Are you saying DouGay post is a normal post from a normal
person?

I never even suggested it. But -you- were

saying he must be gay because he always

talks about the subject.


LOL....yes. See, you can learn when forced. Hold on tight,,I'm about to
fill your skullcap.

Is there some sort of psychological precedent
or research that supports your argument?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==
Yes. Freud. He compared it to ice cream. A slow, learning impaired child
with a subpar IQ who loves ice cream, may take to involuntary insertion
and mentioning "ice cream" in parts of their speech where it most
certainly doesn't fit and makes no sense. Freud claimed the same flawed
behavioral "tick" is responsible for the sexually deranged and
obsessed.....that involuntary sexual speech, most notable
homophobic/homosexual, and sex as relates to a mother figure, is the
subjects most innate desire. This information is available to anyone who
wishes to take the time and do a casual search of Freud and his works
relating to the sexual and biological conditioning of prepubescents and
how they digress (get worse over time). In other words, Freud holds that
such sicknesses are incurable and get
worse, not better with time as some believe.

Freud was a nutcase and so are you, Dave.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

I never even suggested it. But -you- were saying he must be gay because he
always talks about the subject. Is there some sort of psychological precedent or
research that supports your argument?

Are you blind? Have you not seen his preoccupation with child
pornographic symbolism. His preoccupation with.gay remarks and
innuendo.?

Yes there is precedent. Open your psychology 101 book and start
reading.

In , wrote:


I never even suggested it. But -you- were saying he must be gay because he
always talks about the subject. Is there some sort of psychological precedent or
research that supports your argument?

Are you blind? Have you not seen his preoccupation with child
pornographic symbolism. His preoccupation with.gay remarks and
innuendo.?

Yes there is precedent. Open your psychology 101 book and start
reading.

I took the course. To which concept are you referring? I don't think it's there,
Tnom. I think you are looking for a reason beyond the obvious -- he's just
trying to offend you. And the fact that he drew you into the flame-fest is proof
that he suceeded. Now you have to decide whether or not you are going to remain
in a flame-war filled with child-porn and homosexuality, and if you do, doesn't
that give others the perception that you are no worse than him? Think about it.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , wrote:
I never even suggested it. But -you- were saying he must be gay because
he always talks about the subject. Is there some sort of psychological
precedent or research that supports your argument?
Are you blind? Have you not seen his preoccupation with child
pornographic symbolism. His preoccupation with.gay remarks and
innuendo.?
Yes there is precedent. Open your psychology 101 book and start reading.

I took the course.


Oh aman,,,here we go again. Only since you feel it pertinent,,,,,where
did you take such a course? LOL!

To which concept are you referring?


You can't even accept one of the the world's most widely accepted
author, scholar, and theorist in the field of psychology. Once again,
you make certain what you speak of has no merit.


I don't

think it's there, Tnom.



Something else you can't find on gooogle? LMAO!

I think you are looking


Your thoughts are for our entertainment only. Please confine them to
such.

for a reason beyond the obvious -- he's just

trying to offend you. And the fact that he drew

you into the flame-fest is proof that he

suceeded. Now you have to decide whether or
not you are going to remain in a flame-war

filled with child-porn


We are NOT speaking of Dave Hall at this point in time. Of course, if
you wish to persue....

and homosexuality, and if

you do, doesn't that give others the perception
that you are no worse than him? Think about

it.


LOL....as always, the majority of others don't give a damn to the extent
you do of what others think. This unhealthy trait is inherent to the
loser lids of the group, aptly named by Arron Voobner: KC8LDO, N3CVC,
N7VCF, N8WWM, WA3MOJ.
Thank you Mr. "Voobner" (never thought I'd say that).
Keepin with what others "think" it has been your professed wish that a
certain element be ignored and go away. This illustrtates your need for
"wannabe" moderator status, something you strive for but fall way short
of,,the need to be obeyed,,the need to tell others what to do., just
like when you impotently begged for followers into the "new" group you
failed to start. I'll tell you what one thinks, since I share the
average cber mindset much more than you ever can hope......we think that
by NOT ignoring the abuse, loser clones like yourself will continue to
be chased from ISP to ISP for your inability to adhere to the rules in
place to benefit all. By doing what you ask, ignoring the abuse, the
abusers are given free reign and a safe haven. Won't happen while I draw
breath. Begging me to leave has you coming unglued at the seams and not
practicing what you hypocritically preach to others. You need a
life....LOL, as you fail miserably at attempts to live vicariously
through mine...LOL!


-----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----=3D=3D

I took the course. To which concept are you referring? I don't think it's there,
Tnom. I think you are looking for a reason beyond the obvious -- he's just
trying to offend you.

No. the fact that you seem to find more problems with my reply than
his post shows you are sympathetic towards his leanings. (pedophilia,
homosexuality ect.)

For all we know you may be DouGays love partner


And the fact that he drew you into the flame-fest is proof
that he suceeded. Now you have to decide whether or not you are going to remain
in a flame-war filled with child-porn and homosexuality, and if you do, doesn't
that give others the perception that you are no worse than him? Think about it.

You are a hypocrite. You have drawn yourself into this thread yet my
legitimate response is somehow not as worthy as yours?

Like I said before. Your sympathy toward posters authoring stories on
pedophilia and homosexuality is showing.

In , wrote:


I took the course. To which concept are you referring? I don't think it's there,
Tnom. I think you are looking for a reason beyond the obvious -- he's just
trying to offend you.

No. the fact that you seem to find more problems with my reply than
his post shows you are sympathetic towards his leanings. (pedophilia,
homosexuality ect.)

For all we know you may be DouGays love partner


And the fact that he drew you into the flame-fest is proof
that he suceeded. Now you have to decide whether or not you are going to remain
in a flame-war filled with child-porn and homosexuality, and if you do, doesn't
that give others the perception that you are no worse than him? Think about it.

You are a hypocrite. You have drawn yourself into this thread yet my
legitimate response is somehow not as worthy as yours?

Like I said before. Your sympathy toward posters authoring stories on
pedophilia and homosexuality is showing.


And I thought there was hope. Guess not.








-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Like I said before. Your sympathy toward posters authoring stories on
pedophilia and homosexuality is showing.


And I thought there was hope. Guess not.


No. It is common knowledge that once a pedophile, always a pedophile.

In your case, once a sympathizer always a sympathizer.