Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02 Feb 2004 13:43:00 GMT, (WA8ULX) wrote:
You dont have any facts! That you want to hear And he avoids it again. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 22:41:17 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this
mindspring.com wrote: "WA8ULX" wrote in message ... If the FCC does'nt care about the code, then why would they throw out this proposal which includes what the FCC has been wanting (Streamlining)? kf6foz He still doesnt get it Well Bruce, like I say.....Ya jest cain't fix stupid. Dan/W4NTI It's obvious, they couldn't fix you or Bruce. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:18:51 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this
mindspring.com wrote: "Old School" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 13:33:10 -0500, Lou wrote: On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:21:23 +0100, "Helmut" wrote: Its not them, the CBLUSSERS AN`D KNUCKLE.... as you call them, dear poor old man Bruce, making me ashamed to be a ham myself. Its you allone, and these human beeings never stopping to accept decisions from the ITU, IARU and FCC. International, all the decisions were made and are validated. And the little America will run behind. I always thought, the Americans, they are the leaders of the world! Not in Amateur Radio. Their highest class amateurs are too old, stupid and shortminded to be. 73 de OE8SOQ Helmut Even though I can be included in this group, because of idiots like Bruce, I have to agree with Helmut. Unfortunately he makes us ALL look bad. ![]() operators here in America than bad ones like Bruce. The problem with Bruce is, He is all mouth and no action. America needs to move forward with all aspects. People like Bruce are the one that hold this country back from progress. All I can say now is, he and his little leet group of CBextra buddies will be all alone. All of us other open minded hams like Helmut and HLR will be be having fun talking on our rigs while you sit there waiting for someone to beep you. 73 de kf6foz How does wanting to preserve the past mean he is holding things back? You no code geeks are the short sighted ones. Just because it is old, does NOT MEAN you should throw it out with the trash. Dan/W4NTI None of us have said anything about throwing it in the trash. Some of these NO-CODERs are gonna get there code because of the mystery of code. It's like watching a scrambled cable tv channel, makes you wonder what is going on. I don't want to see code gone as in never used again. Keep it part of the Amateur Community, but don't force it on others. There is other ways of preserving code which I see on Field Day and Swap Meets also at Club Meetings. Keep it alive by discussing it and doing competitions like field day. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Old School" wrote in message ... On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:18:51 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote: "Old School" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 13:33:10 -0500, Lou wrote: On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:21:23 +0100, "Helmut" wrote: Its not them, the CBLUSSERS AN`D KNUCKLE.... as you call them, dear poor old man Bruce, making me ashamed to be a ham myself. Its you allone, and these human beeings never stopping to accept decisions from the ITU, IARU and FCC. International, all the decisions were made and are validated. And the little America will run behind. I always thought, the Americans, they are the leaders of the world! Not in Amateur Radio. Their highest class amateurs are too old, stupid and shortminded to be. 73 de OE8SOQ Helmut Even though I can be included in this group, because of idiots like Bruce, I have to agree with Helmut. Unfortunately he makes us ALL look bad. ![]() operators here in America than bad ones like Bruce. The problem with Bruce is, He is all mouth and no action. America needs to move forward with all aspects. People like Bruce are the one that hold this country back from progress. All I can say now is, he and his little leet group of CBextra buddies will be all alone. All of us other open minded hams like Helmut and HLR will be be having fun talking on our rigs while you sit there waiting for someone to beep you. 73 de kf6foz How does wanting to preserve the past mean he is holding things back? You no code geeks are the short sighted ones. Just because it is old, does NOT MEAN you should throw it out with the trash. Dan/W4NTI None of us have said anything about throwing it in the trash. Some of these NO-CODERs are gonna get there code because of the mystery of code. It's like watching a scrambled cable tv channel, makes you wonder what is going on. I don't want to see code gone as in never used again. Keep it part of the Amateur Community, but don't force it on others. There is other ways of preserving code which I see on Field Day and Swap Meets also at Club Meetings. Keep it alive by discussing it and doing competitions like field day. Dang...something I can agree with. You know something? I suggested the three license system a long time ago to the FCC. And I also suggested a endorsement program. Such as for various 'specialty' modes. SSTV, CW, Digital, etc. These would require the applicant to show some degree of competence in those modes, such as at a club. It was totally ignored of course. Dan/W4NTI |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steveo wrote: Old School wrote: On 02 Feb 2004 13:43:00 GMT, (WA8ULX) wrote: You dont have any facts! That you want to hear And he avoids it again. He doesn't use CW anymore than I do. Your wife said you got CW tatooed on your left ass cheek. |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:58:55 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this
mindspring.com wrote: "Old School" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:18:51 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote: "Old School" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 13:33:10 -0500, Lou wrote: On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:21:23 +0100, "Helmut" wrote: Its not them, the CBLUSSERS AN`D KNUCKLE.... as you call them, dear poor old man Bruce, making me ashamed to be a ham myself. Its you allone, and these human beeings never stopping to accept decisions from the ITU, IARU and FCC. International, all the decisions were made and are validated. And the little America will run behind. I always thought, the Americans, they are the leaders of the world! Not in Amateur Radio. Their highest class amateurs are too old, stupid and shortminded to be. 73 de OE8SOQ Helmut Even though I can be included in this group, because of idiots like Bruce, I have to agree with Helmut. Unfortunately he makes us ALL look bad. ![]() operators here in America than bad ones like Bruce. The problem with Bruce is, He is all mouth and no action. America needs to move forward with all aspects. People like Bruce are the one that hold this country back from progress. All I can say now is, he and his little leet group of CBextra buddies will be all alone. All of us other open minded hams like Helmut and HLR will be be having fun talking on our rigs while you sit there waiting for someone to beep you. 73 de kf6foz How does wanting to preserve the past mean he is holding things back? You no code geeks are the short sighted ones. Just because it is old, does NOT MEAN you should throw it out with the trash. Dan/W4NTI None of us have said anything about throwing it in the trash. Some of these NO-CODERs are gonna get there code because of the mystery of code. It's like watching a scrambled cable tv channel, makes you wonder what is going on. I don't want to see code gone as in never used again. Keep it part of the Amateur Community, but don't force it on others. There is other ways of preserving code which I see on Field Day and Swap Meets also at Club Meetings. Keep it alive by discussing it and doing competitions like field day. Dang...something I can agree with. You know something? I suggested the three license system a long time ago to the FCC. And I also suggested a endorsement program. Such as for various 'specialty' modes. SSTV, CW, Digital, etc. These would require the applicant to show some degree of competence in those modes, such as at a club. It was totally ignored of course. Dan/W4NTI Nice to agree on one thing at least! ![]() and it wouldn't have been ignored by me... |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Old School" wrote in message ... On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 02:53:10 GMT, "Dee D. Flint" wrote: "Old School" wrote in message .. . What is it you phoney people want? No free upgrades. Even if code is dropped they should have to take the written. What is so hard to understand about that? Absolutley nothing! The FCC has made references to the Streamlining. It will be alot of work in order to change the system, but in the long run, it will be much easier to maintain. Think about it, they will only have to maintain 3 groups of licenses, Novice, General and Extra instead of 6, Novice, Tech, Tech +, General, Advanced and Extra. Like I said, it does not make the system easier to maintain. For current license class, the database only needs a single field. It doesn't matter if there is a choice of 3 possible entries or 6 possible entries. It's a single keystroke in a single field. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE I should correct myself, it wont make the system easier to maintain, however it will reduce the amount of paper work, printing supplies and confusion at the testing site and printing facility. Therefore it will help reduce confusion at the FFC offices. The FCC generally doesn't even see the paperwork anymore. The VECs enter it right on-line. Thus there is no confusion at the FCC offices as they aren't doing any of the work. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have had my Tech license for about a year now, and have been learning the
code. I am getting very close to being able to take the code test. I find it a lot of fun and look forward to operating on the HF bands. If everyone could play nice and stay on their own freqs for CW, SSB, etc. the code requirement could be lifted. That would be an ideal situation where everyone could enjoy amateur radio using their favorite method of communication. But since that normally doesn't happen, the requirement stays. If the CW requirement is abolished after I have my licensee, so be it. But I'll have something the no-coders don't... a working knowledge of another way of communication that has been around in the past, present, and will remain with us in the future. I have enjoyed this hobby so far, and am looking forward to getting on the HF bands in the future. I also look to the "old-timers" and "newbies" alike for help, guidance, and just good conversation. Just my 2 cents worth... Doug/KC8YEC "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message ink.net... "Old School" wrote in message ... On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:18:51 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote: "Old School" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 13:33:10 -0500, Lou wrote: On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:21:23 +0100, "Helmut" wrote: Its not them, the CBLUSSERS AN`D KNUCKLE.... as you call them, dear poor old man Bruce, making me ashamed to be a ham myself. Its you allone, and these human beeings never stopping to accept decisions from the ITU, IARU and FCC. International, all the decisions were made and are validated. And the little America will run behind. I always thought, the Americans, they are the leaders of the world! Not in Amateur Radio. Their highest class amateurs are too old, stupid and shortminded to be. 73 de OE8SOQ Helmut Even though I can be included in this group, because of idiots like Bruce, I have to agree with Helmut. Unfortunately he makes us ALL look bad. ![]() good operators here in America than bad ones like Bruce. The problem with Bruce is, He is all mouth and no action. America needs to move forward with all aspects. People like Bruce are the one that hold this country back from progress. All I can say now is, he and his little leet group of CBextra buddies will be all alone. All of us other open minded hams like Helmut and HLR will be be having fun talking on our rigs while you sit there waiting for someone to beep you. 73 de kf6foz How does wanting to preserve the past mean he is holding things back? You no code geeks are the short sighted ones. Just because it is old, does NOT MEAN you should throw it out with the trash. Dan/W4NTI None of us have said anything about throwing it in the trash. Some of these NO-CODERs are gonna get there code because of the mystery of code. It's like watching a scrambled cable tv channel, makes you wonder what is going on. I don't want to see code gone as in never used again. Keep it part of the Amateur Community, but don't force it on others. There is other ways of preserving code which I see on Field Day and Swap Meets also at Club Meetings. Keep it alive by discussing it and doing competitions like field day. Dang...something I can agree with. You know something? I suggested the three license system a long time ago to the FCC. And I also suggested a endorsement program. Such as for various 'specialty' modes. SSTV, CW, Digital, etc. These would require the applicant to show some degree of competence in those modes, such as at a club. It was totally ignored of course. Dan/W4NTI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|