Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:57:02 -0500, Lou wrote:
On 03 Feb 2004 01:16:03 GMT, (WA8ULX) wrote: Mud Duck? Explain please. Thats one of them there CB words Dan mud duck: A person with a very weak radio signal Mud Duck: Uneducated, illiterate, unemployed person of mixed racial heritage usually found in south Louisiana wearing purple and gold camouflage overalls. Generally sporting a molester mustache and mullet. Example: "A rowdy flock of mud ducks gathered at the Circle K to stock up on Kool cigarettes, 40 oz. Schlitz malt liquor, and lottery tickets prior to the LSU football game." Hmmm, seems both definitions fit you like a glove. LOL! Took me a few minutes to pick myself up off the floor from holding my side and rolling around in hysterical laughter after reading this. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 03:23:57 GMT, Old School
wrote: On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:57:02 -0500, Lou wrote: On 03 Feb 2004 01:16:03 GMT, (WA8ULX) wrote: Mud Duck? Explain please. Thats one of them there CB words Dan mud duck: A person with a very weak radio signal Mud Duck: Uneducated, illiterate, unemployed person of mixed racial heritage usually found in south Louisiana wearing purple and gold camouflage overalls. Generally sporting a molester mustache and mullet. Example: "A rowdy flock of mud ducks gathered at the Circle K to stock up on Kool cigarettes, 40 oz. Schlitz malt liquor, and lottery tickets prior to the LSU football game." Hmmm, seems both definitions fit you like a glove. LOL! Took me a few minutes to pick myself up off the floor from holding my side and rolling around in hysterical laughter after reading this. This is without a doubt the funniest thing ever posted here. Great one Lou. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:18:26 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote: Not bad, Lou. However, my encyclopedia has a slightly different description. "Mud Duck: Poorly educated, illiterate, person often begot by adults and/or children of the same immediate family. Most often seen hanging around woods or swamps, usually with a female relative or male friend, supposedly hunting for raccoons or possum. They can easily be differentiated from other creatures by the large, protruding, belly and telltale tobacco products and liquor stuffed into the pockets of camouflage overalls. Inbreeding, a generous use of alcohol, and a tendency to carry guns nearly everywhere (dates, weddings, church, and so on), makes this backwoods creature particularly dangerous." Many in the South refer to them as a "backwoods redneck" to differentiate from the somewhat harmless city or town redneck. ;-) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "medina_mopo" wrote in message ... Steveo wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote: "Old School" wrote in message . .. It doesnt make you a more capable operator, it just make you capable of doing another mode. Big Deal! Which makes one a more capable operator. Gotcha ! Dan/W4NTI In your case it shows what a blowhard you are. You're the biggest blowhard in North America. Thank you for your vote. But you need to listen to 75 more. I am but a little blow compaired to the likes of the kings. Dan/W4NTI |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Old School wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:18:26 GMT, "Dwight Stewart" wrote: Not bad, Lou. However, my encyclopedia has a slightly different description. "Mud Duck: Poorly educated, illiterate, person often begot by adults and/or children of the same immediate family. Most often seen hanging around woods or swamps, usually with a female relative or male friend, supposedly hunting for raccoons or possum. They can easily be differentiated from other creatures by the large, protruding, belly and telltale tobacco products and liquor stuffed into the pockets of camouflage overalls. Inbreeding, a generous use of alcohol, and a tendency to carry guns nearly everywhere (dates, weddings, church, and so on), makes this backwoods creature particularly dangerous." Many in the South refer to them as a "backwoods redneck" to differentiate from the somewhat harmless city or town redneck. ;-) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ dwight stewart? wasn't that the guy who used to post as Aaron H. Voobner? |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(I Am Not George) wrote in message om...
Duke Of Windsor Date: Tue, Feb 3, 2004 8:31 PM Message-id: (gw) wrote in . com: Old School wrote in message . .. On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:18:26 GMT, "Dwight Stewart" wrote: Not bad, Lou. However, my encyclopedia has a slightly different description. "Mud Duck: Poorly educated, illiterate, person often begot by adults and/or children of the same immediate family. Most often seen hanging around woods or swamps, usually with a female relative or male friend, supposedly hunting for raccoons or possum. They can easily be differentiated from other creatures by the large, protruding, belly and telltale tobacco products and liquor stuffed into the pockets of camouflage overalls. Inbreeding, a generous use of alcohol, and a tendency to carry guns nearly everywhere (dates, weddings, church, and so on), makes this backwoods creature particularly dangerous." Many in the South refer to them as a "backwoods redneck" to differentiate from the somewhat harmless city or town redneck. ;-) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ dwight stewart? wasn't that the guy who used to post as Aaron H. Voobner? gw we will have to get you a copy of the AKC Handbook it displells many myths and notions put forth by keyclowns. Just like they thought Sparky was Voob. Is your name really terry bull, if that is so you is a wrestler I think that medina mopo guy ought to be given an AKC medal for the way he has cut Steveo down to size.. i don't know.......stevo sounds like a knuckle dragger......he might try to find and beat up you guys ......you had better watch out........ |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I don't know this Bruce but he sounds like an old "General Class"
that I would probably not only like but would consider a knowledgeable ham. The rest of you sound like no-coders (formally CBer's) who "Know" what is best these days for ham radio. Just listen to these questions on this node from all these Geniuses! They don't know where to put their "autotuners" in the line, They don't know where to "BUY" a windom (LMAO), they can't figure out how to tune the plate and grid on their rig, and it goes on and on. Now there is nothing wrong with these questions but there is something very wrong with giving these folks HF privileges!!!!!! Now everyone has to go through this phase, but not with a general or advanced or extra class ticket!!!!! That is what the Novice band is for. For you to learn my friend. I am an extra class boys and I definitely had to accomplish 20wpm code to get that ticket. As I recall, the exam I took was not something a 7 year old girl could have passed either ![]() Now you boys need to come around folks like Bruce with you hat in your hand, not with that "screw you old man" attitude. Who do you think will answer your questions and Elmer you into being operators? You think the no-coders actually have the knowledge? ROTFLMAO! Mitch AE4YW -- "Come by and sit a spell with me at www.volstate.net/~mitch/ " "Old School" wrote in message ... On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 09:46:44 GMT, "Dwight Stewart" wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" wrote: Why the difference between HF and VHF ? Because HF requires more operator ability to properly operate in the crowded invironment there. (snip) Nonsense. If HF really "requires" more operator ability, why are those without that ability (those newly licensed to classes with those privileges) routinely allowed on those frequencies? Like everything else in Ham radio, any unique skills for actual HF operation is learned after the license exams through practice. If the rules allowed, absolutely anybody, regardless of license class, could do the same. (snip) And to fullfill why ham radio even exists. To help provide a trained group of radio operators and electronic personnel in the event of national emergency. (snip) Rewriting why Amateur Radio exists, Dan? I saw nothing about preparing for a "national emergency" in the rules. Regardless, exactly how are you, with your license class, better prepared for a "national emergency" than I am with my license class? The only significant difference between the two license classes is code and the frequencies we operate on (and my radio equipment is capable of covering those frequencies). If one is able to do CW. He is a more capable operator. (snip) In your own mind. If that were actually true, it would remain true throughout radio. Are you a "more capable" operator then military radio personnel who have no CW requirement? Are you a "more capable" operator than commercial radio operators who also have no CW requirement? Of course not. Beyond CW, there is nothing inherent about CW that would make one more capable. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ Bruce might learn something from Dwight if he would open his mind up and listen. I like your site Dwight. It shows what Amateur Radio is about and what Bruce isn't capable of. kf6foz |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce isn't an Elmer. In fact, if you read his posts, he only answers
questions with name calling and insults. He brought the "screw you old man" attitude upon himself with his own attitude. Guy P. Distaffen KB0SWS "Mitch Dickson" wrote in message ... Well, I don't know this Bruce but he sounds like an old "General Class" that I would probably not only like but would consider a knowledgeable ham. snip Now you boys need to come around folks like Bruce with you hat in your hand, not with that "screw you old man" attitude. Who do you think will answer your questions and Elmer you into being operators? You think the no-coders actually have the knowledge? ROTFLMAO! Mitch AE4YW |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 22:31:06 -0600, Duke Of Windsor
wrote: (gw) wrote in . com: Old School wrote in message . .. On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:18:26 GMT, "Dwight Stewart" wrote: Not bad, Lou. However, my encyclopedia has a slightly different description. "Mud Duck: Poorly educated, illiterate, person often begot by adults and/or children of the same immediate family. Most often seen hanging around woods or swamps, usually with a female relative or male friend, supposedly hunting for raccoons or possum. They can easily be differentiated from other creatures by the large, protruding, belly and telltale tobacco products and liquor stuffed into the pockets of camouflage overalls. Inbreeding, a generous use of alcohol, and a tendency to carry guns nearly everywhere (dates, weddings, church, and so on), makes this backwoods creature particularly dangerous." Many in the South refer to them as a "backwoods redneck" to differentiate from the somewhat harmless city or town redneck. ;-) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ dwight stewart? wasn't that the guy who used to post as Aaron H. Voobner? gw we will have to get you a copy of the AKC Handbook it displells many myths and notions put forth by keyclowns. Is your name really terry bull, if that is so you is a wrestler Are you talking about Texas Terry Bull, the wrestler? Or the Terry Bull that used to post to rec.radio.scanner? Or the Terry Bull that use to post under the names: Ben Dover or I. P. Dailey? Terry Bull was the registered "owner" of webhideout.com, which has for some reason now expired. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dan/W4NTI | Policy | |||
Dan/W4NTI | General | |||
Dan, WA8ULX is a CBplusser | Policy |