Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #13   Report Post  
Old February 3rd 04, 11:30 PM
Old School
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:18:26 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote:


Not bad, Lou. However, my encyclopedia has a slightly different
description.

"Mud Duck: Poorly educated, illiterate, person
often begot by adults and/or children of the
same immediate family. Most often seen
hanging around woods or swamps, usually
with a female relative or male friend, supposedly
hunting for raccoons or possum. They can easily
be differentiated from other creatures by the
large, protruding, belly and telltale tobacco
products and liquor stuffed into the pockets of
camouflage overalls. Inbreeding, a generous use
of alcohol, and a tendency to carry guns nearly
everywhere (dates, weddings, church, and so
on), makes this backwoods creature particularly
dangerous."

Many in the South refer to them as a "backwoods redneck" to differentiate
from the somewhat harmless city or town redneck. ;-)


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


  #14   Report Post  
Old February 3rd 04, 11:54 PM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"medina_mopo" wrote in message
...


Steveo wrote:

"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote:

"Old School" wrote in message
. ..


It doesnt make you a more capable operator, it just make you capable
of doing another mode. Big Deal!

Which makes one a more capable operator. Gotcha !

Dan/W4NTI


In your case it shows what a blowhard you are.


You're the biggest blowhard in North America.


Thank you for your vote. But you need to listen to 75 more. I am but a
little blow compaired to the likes of the kings.

Dan/W4NTI


  #15   Report Post  
Old February 4th 04, 03:30 AM
gw
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Old School wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:18:26 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote:


Not bad, Lou. However, my encyclopedia has a slightly different
description.

"Mud Duck: Poorly educated, illiterate, person
often begot by adults and/or children of the
same immediate family. Most often seen
hanging around woods or swamps, usually
with a female relative or male friend, supposedly
hunting for raccoons or possum. They can easily
be differentiated from other creatures by the
large, protruding, belly and telltale tobacco
products and liquor stuffed into the pockets of
camouflage overalls. Inbreeding, a generous use
of alcohol, and a tendency to carry guns nearly
everywhere (dates, weddings, church, and so
on), makes this backwoods creature particularly
dangerous."

Many in the South refer to them as a "backwoods redneck" to differentiate
from the somewhat harmless city or town redneck. ;-)


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/



dwight stewart? wasn't that the guy who used to post as Aaron H. Voobner?


  #16   Report Post  
Old February 4th 04, 06:03 AM
I Am Not George
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Duke Of Windsor
Date: Tue, Feb 3, 2004 8:31 PM
Message-id:

(gw) wrote in
. com:

Old School wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:18:26 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote:


Not bad, Lou. However, my encyclopedia has a slightly different
description.

"Mud Duck: Poorly educated, illiterate, person
often begot by adults and/or children of the
same immediate family. Most often seen
hanging around woods or swamps, usually
with a female relative or male friend, supposedly
hunting for raccoons or possum. They can easily
be differentiated from other creatures by the
large, protruding, belly and telltale tobacco
products and liquor stuffed into the pockets of
camouflage overalls. Inbreeding, a generous use
of alcohol, and a tendency to carry guns nearly
everywhere (dates, weddings, church, and so
on), makes this backwoods creature particularly
dangerous."

Many in the South refer to them as a "backwoods redneck" to
differentiate
from the somewhat harmless city or town redneck. ;-)


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


dwight stewart? wasn't that the guy who used to post as Aaron H.
Voobner?


gw we will have to get you a copy of the AKC Handbook
it displells many myths and notions put forth by keyclowns.


Just like they thought Sparky was Voob.

Is your name really terry bull, if that is so you is a wrestler


I think that medina mopo guy ought to be given an AKC medal for the
way he has cut Steveo down to size..
  #17   Report Post  
Old February 4th 04, 03:31 PM
gw
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(I Am Not George) wrote in message om...
Duke Of Windsor

Date: Tue, Feb 3, 2004 8:31 PM
Message-id:

(gw) wrote in
. com:

Old School wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:18:26 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote:


Not bad, Lou. However, my encyclopedia has a slightly different
description.

"Mud Duck: Poorly educated, illiterate, person
often begot by adults and/or children of the
same immediate family. Most often seen
hanging around woods or swamps, usually
with a female relative or male friend, supposedly
hunting for raccoons or possum. They can easily
be differentiated from other creatures by the
large, protruding, belly and telltale tobacco
products and liquor stuffed into the pockets of
camouflage overalls. Inbreeding, a generous use
of alcohol, and a tendency to carry guns nearly
everywhere (dates, weddings, church, and so
on), makes this backwoods creature particularly
dangerous."

Many in the South refer to them as a "backwoods redneck" to
differentiate
from the somewhat harmless city or town redneck. ;-)


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


dwight stewart? wasn't that the guy who used to post as Aaron H.
Voobner?


gw we will have to get you a copy of the AKC Handbook
it displells many myths and notions put forth by keyclowns.


Just like they thought Sparky was Voob.

Is your name really terry bull, if that is so you is a wrestler


I think that medina mopo guy ought to be given an AKC medal for the
way he has cut Steveo down to size..



i don't know.......stevo sounds like a knuckle dragger......he might
try to find and beat up you guys ......you had better watch
out........
  #18   Report Post  
Old March 1st 04, 06:28 PM
Mitch Dickson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I don't know this Bruce but he sounds like an old "General Class"
that I would probably not only like but would consider a knowledgeable ham.

The rest of you sound like no-coders (formally CBer's) who "Know" what is
best these days for ham radio. Just listen to these questions on this node
from all these Geniuses! They don't know where to put their "autotuners" in
the line, They don't know where to "BUY" a windom (LMAO), they can't figure
out how to tune the plate and grid on their rig, and it goes on and on.

Now there is nothing wrong with these questions but there is something very
wrong with giving these folks HF privileges!!!!!! Now everyone has to go
through this phase, but not with a general or advanced or extra class
ticket!!!!! That is what the Novice band is for. For you to learn my
friend.

I am an extra class boys and I definitely had to accomplish 20wpm code to
get that ticket. As I recall, the exam I took was not something a 7 year
old girl could have passed either

Now you boys need to come around folks like Bruce with you hat in your hand,
not with that "screw you old man" attitude. Who do you think will answer
your questions and Elmer you into being operators? You think the no-coders
actually have the knowledge? ROTFLMAO!

Mitch
AE4YW
--
"Come by and sit a spell with me at www.volstate.net/~mitch/ "


"Old School" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 09:46:44 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote:

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote:

Why the difference between HF and VHF ?
Because HF requires more operator ability
to properly operate in the crowded
invironment there. (snip)



Nonsense. If HF really "requires" more operator ability, why are those
without that ability (those newly licensed to classes with those

privileges)
routinely allowed on those frequencies? Like everything else in Ham

radio,
any unique skills for actual HF operation is learned after the license

exams
through practice. If the rules allowed, absolutely anybody, regardless of
license class, could do the same.


(snip) And to fullfill why ham radio even exists.
To help provide a trained group of radio
operators and electronic personnel in the event
of national emergency. (snip)



Rewriting why Amateur Radio exists, Dan? I saw nothing about preparing

for
a "national emergency" in the rules. Regardless, exactly how are you,

with
your license class, better prepared for a "national emergency" than I am
with my license class? The only significant difference between the two
license classes is code and the frequencies we operate on (and my radio
equipment is capable of covering those frequencies).


If one is able to do CW. He is a more capable
operator. (snip)



In your own mind. If that were actually true, it would remain true
throughout radio. Are you a "more capable" operator then military radio
personnel who have no CW requirement? Are you a "more capable" operator

than
commercial radio operators who also have no CW requirement? Of course

not.
Beyond CW, there is nothing inherent about CW that would make one more
capable.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

Bruce might learn something from Dwight if he would open his mind up
and listen. I like your site Dwight. It shows what Amateur Radio is
about and what Bruce isn't capable of.

kf6foz



  #19   Report Post  
Old March 1st 04, 06:33 PM
Guy P. Distaffen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bruce isn't an Elmer. In fact, if you read his posts, he only answers
questions with name calling and insults. He brought the "screw you old man"
attitude upon himself with his own attitude.

Guy P. Distaffen

KB0SWS

"Mitch Dickson" wrote in message
...
Well, I don't know this Bruce but he sounds like an old "General Class"
that I would probably not only like but would consider a knowledgeable

ham.

snip

Now you boys need to come around folks like Bruce with you hat in your

hand,
not with that "screw you old man" attitude. Who do you think will answer
your questions and Elmer you into being operators? You think the

no-coders
actually have the knowledge? ROTFLMAO!

Mitch
AE4YW



  #20   Report Post  
Old March 11th 04, 08:51 PM
Lancer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 22:31:06 -0600, Duke Of Windsor
wrote:

(gw) wrote in
. com:

Old School wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:18:26 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote:


Not bad, Lou. However, my encyclopedia has a slightly different
description.

"Mud Duck: Poorly educated, illiterate, person
often begot by adults and/or children of the
same immediate family. Most often seen
hanging around woods or swamps, usually
with a female relative or male friend, supposedly
hunting for raccoons or possum. They can easily
be differentiated from other creatures by the
large, protruding, belly and telltale tobacco
products and liquor stuffed into the pockets of
camouflage overalls. Inbreeding, a generous use
of alcohol, and a tendency to carry guns nearly
everywhere (dates, weddings, church, and so
on), makes this backwoods creature particularly
dangerous."

Many in the South refer to them as a "backwoods redneck" to
differentiate
from the somewhat harmless city or town redneck. ;-)


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/



dwight stewart? wasn't that the guy who used to post as Aaron H.
Voobner?


gw we will have to get you a copy of the AKC Handbook
it displells many myths and notions put forth by keyclowns.

Is your name really terry bull, if that is so you is a wrestler


Are you talking about Texas Terry Bull, the wrestler?

Or the Terry Bull that used to post to rec.radio.scanner?

Or the Terry Bull that use to post under the names:
Ben Dover or I. P. Dailey?

Terry Bull was the registered "owner" of webhideout.com, which has for
some reason now expired.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dan/W4NTI Frank Todd K3EKO Policy 1 September 24th 03 10:31 PM
Dan/W4NTI Frank Todd General 0 September 24th 03 04:32 AM
Dan, WA8ULX is a CBplusser WA8ULX Policy 0 September 8th 03 05:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017