"FlavaFlav" wrote in message
...
BP wrote in news:109q74hluqrkt94
@corp.supernews.com:

(I Am Not George) wrote in
m:

"Landshark" wrote in message
om...
"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:


It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster
concerning use of modified equipment on 11m.

Totally relevant, you made a post, I countered with one
of dozens of hams doing far worse things. Shall I post the one
about a Ham broadcasting illegally on FM? How about the one
that was interfering with Police & Fire Emergency calls?
Hey, we can even give you the one about a Ham trying to be
an air traffic controller, how about that one?
If you just want to harrass Mopar, do it! But I still
wouldn't
want to be in your shoes ( harassing a guy of his size, living in
an area where you have to answer the door with a gun, etc etc)

oh poor moped he is so harassed LOL yes it is a game to harass him on
this NG his size has nothing to do with it because he is a pussy all
he does it take pictures and leave notes ROTFLMAO hey steveo if you
come to my house at least do the lawn while your here


..and stupid run on sentence from the AKC peanut gallery.

Hey Randy how goes it.

Wrong again, moron. But, it should be a wakeup call for you that the rest of
the world recognizes your illiteracy.

On Fri, 07 May 2004 03:39:02 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554


Irrelevant. This is a CB newsgroup. The "bad apples" of the ham radio
fraternity have no bearing on what happens here.

Besides, two wrongs do not make a right. The fact that there are a
fair percentage of bad hams, does not diminish the seriousness of
illegal CB operation.

The original poster was not asking for information about "peaked and
tuned" ham radios.......

Dave
"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

On Sat, 08 May 2004 13:50:35 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:


It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster concerning
use of modified equipment on 11m.

Totally relevant, you made a post, I countered with one
of dozens of hams doing far worse things.

This is not a ham newsgroup. What happens on ham radio is irrelevant
to the cause of CB radio.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Dave Hall wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2004 13:50:35 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:


It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster
concerning use of modified equipment on 11m.

Totally relevant, you made a post, I countered with one
of dozens of hams doing far worse things.

This is not a ham newsgroup. What happens on ham radio is irrelevant
to the cause of CB radio.

Except for the fact that certain hams like to come here to ****
with us CBers, and Jerry likes to post the enforcement logs.

So yes it is relevant.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

Dave Hall wrote:
On Fri, 07 May 2004 03:39:02 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554

Irrelevant. This is a CB newsgroup. The "bad apples" of the ham radio
fraternity have no bearing on what happens here.

Besides, two wrongs do not make a right. The fact that there are a
fair percentage of bad hams, does not diminish the seriousness of
illegal CB operation.

The original poster was not asking for information about "peaked and
tuned" ham radios.......

Get over yourself, or buy a badge.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 May 2004 03:39:02 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554


Irrelevant. This is a CB newsgroup. The "bad apples" of the ham radio
fraternity have no bearing on what happens here.


Sure it does, Lee posts stuff about cb'rs getting busted,
Jer does, N8 does, WA3MOJ does, so why can all these
people put up things about cb'rs, but I can't post this
about Hams? A little one-sided don't you think? Naw,
never mind.

Besides, two wrongs do not make a right. The fact that there are a
fair percentage of bad hams, does not diminish the seriousness of
illegal CB operation.

Agreed, but the fact that this is a CB newsgroup that a couple of
certain hams (N8WWM, WA3MOJ) are trolling this group and
posting that just to inflame is ok? I think not, anymore than if
someone went onto the Ham groups and posted about Hams being
busted and then making statements that most hams are illegal, I
would think that would make them upset too.


The original poster was not asking for information about "peaked and
tuned" ham radios.......

OK, so? This is a CB newsgroup. Not a Ham newsgroup.

Dave

Landshark



--
My bad..the camera is mightier than the blowhard(s)..in most respects.

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Fri, 07 May 2004 03:39:02 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:
"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0You forgot about these Lee:
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0Before
the
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Fe deral Communications
Commission
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0Washington,
D.C. 20554

Irrelevant. This is a CB newsgroup. The "bad

apples" of the ham radio fraternity have no

bearing on what happens here.



Except for the fact that yourself, Lelnad, N8, Geogre and Sparkles are
all "bad apples" of the hammie community, have ALL defended the actions
of the self-labeled AKC and each other, and are responsible for the
garbage that goes on here.


Besides, two wrongs do not make a right. The

fact that there are a fair percentage of bad

hams, does not diminish the seriousness of

illegal CB operation.

The original poster was not asking for

information about "peaked and tuned" ham

radios.......

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

He wasn't asking about actions taken by the FCC either.

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Sat, 08 May 2004 13:50:35 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:
"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...
"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...
"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0You forgot about these Lee:
_
It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster
concerning use of modified equipment on 11m.
_=A0=A0
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Totally relevant, you made a
post, I countered with one of dozens of hams doing far worse things.

_
This is not a ham newsgroup. What happens

on ham radio is irrelevant to the cause of CB

radio.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj


That isn't true at all. Lids like yourself have blurred the line, but
keeping with your non-sensicals, what happens with the FCC regarding
enforcement actions was irrelevant to the original post. The (N3CVJ)
Hypocrite Hall has been closed.

From: (Landshark)
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 May 2004 03:39:02 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:
"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0You forgot about these Lee:
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0Before
the
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Fe deral Communications
Commission
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0Washington,
D.C. 20554
_
Irrelevant. This is a CB newsgroup. The "bad

apples" of the ham radio fraternity have no

bearing on what happens here.
_
Sure it does, Lee posts stuff about cb'rs getting busted, Jer does, N8
does, WA3MOJ does, so why can all these people put up things about
cb'rs, but I can't post this about Hams? A little one-sided don't you
think? Naw, never mind.
_
Exactly, and look who is turning red with constipation over defending
such behavior. The Hypocrite Hall is beside himself and coming out of
the woodwork.

FlavaFlav wrote in
:

(snip)

I am not wa3moj. Deal with it.


yawn..