From: (Leland=A0C.=A0Scott)
"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
Bull****. No such wording in trucker's union contracts. Such rules are
completely voluntary and enacted by the trucking companies.

No export radios, no modified CBs etc. That


was mention specifically when UPS drivers


were caught.


Spread your cheeks wide Twirt and prepare to
take it like a man. And I'll bet you'll even like it

too.



Homsexual connotations by KC8LDO noted.

Quoted from full text article following this.

"UPS Attorney Daniel N. Tenfelde last week

assured Hollingsworth that his company was

taking its Warning Notice seriously and has

launched a full investigation.



No one took issue with your claim that UPS had such a policy. Your
communication deficit is acting up and on display for all to enjoy.

"We discovered that some employees had

obtained CB radios that contained a

mechanism allowing them to switch

frequencies into the 10-meter Amateur Radio

band," he said in a January 28 letter. "It is not

UPS policy to allow equipment such as this to

be used in our vehicles." He said UPS'

contract with the Teamsters Union allows only

for CB radios.






Correct.."UPS" contract,,,NOT the Teamster's CONTRACT. Your
communication deficit is responsible for your flawed interpretation of
such. If you didn;t suffer so massively, you wouldn;t have made such a
mistake.


Tenfelde said UPS is working with its

transportation and labor groups to let drivers

know that such unlicensed operation violates

both UPS policy and FCC regulations."

As you can CLEARLY READ it says UPS'

contract with the Teamsters Union


allows only for CB radios.




Again, it is UPS contract, NOT the Teamsters contract.
KC8LDO you lie to cover the truth, but its out there and there is
NOTHING you can do to stop people from realizing it !! Here it is
again, claiming it is the UPS contract, NOT the Teamster's contract. UPS
is but one of a handful of companies enacting such policies.



http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/02/02/101/?nc=3D


Now, stop your lying KC8LDO, and learn from your mistakes, child.

From: (JJ)
Twistedhed wrote:
More hammies than cbers get popped on a regular basis. One needs weed
through the many hammie busts to find the erant cber.

Which proves the FCC cares more about the

ham bands than they do about cb.


Exactly.



We applaud their efforts to catch the errant

hams, more power to them. That is why they

also go after the illegal cbers that attempt to

operate on the ham bands. They couldn't care

less about the cb band anymore as the cbers

took it upon themselves to turn it into the

sewer pit of the radio spectrum.


Hehhee,,,it wasn't the cbers that brought the extra freqs and in between
capabilities and amps to cb,,,it was the hammies. They actually did all
the cbers a huge favor by their actions,,,,,they turned it into a
virtual free for all and many cbers enjoy it just the way it is, much to
the chagrin of certain scumbag hammies.
I agree, the FCC doesn't care about the cb band, only scurvy hammies who
cause trouble like N8WWM, K4KWH, N7VCF, WA3MOJ, KC8LDO and N3CVJ make
such waves about cb and cbers on this group. It's good that the FCC
enforces the rules on hammie radio concerning unlicensed operation,,,and
hammies operating where they aren't supposed to,,and intentional
interference,,,,and license expiration,,,,and repeater jamming,,,,,,and
everything else.

No union contracts by the Teamsters address the radios as KC8LDO has
maintained. More lies from KCLDO. All can see how he took a single
company (UPS) and THEIR specific contract and took it to mean the
Teamsters have enacted the contract...such is the price he pays for
suffering such a massive deficit in communications.

From: (Leland=A0C.=A0Scott)
"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
The I-85 incidents were reported by one Jerry W. Oxendine, K4KWH. Those
trucking companies have been contacted and made aware. The accused have
a right to know their accuser.

I'll bet they sent him a thank you note, that is if
it really was him.


Oh it was him, alright.
Your "bets" have all proved incompetent and incoherent. Your
cluelessness is on display. If "they" did anything at all, they probably
posted the email near the time clock so the drivers who were accused
were aware of their accusers.
Besides, they were just contacted this week.

--
Leland C. Scott

KC8LDO

ARRL Member

N7VCF wrote:
Busting someone that isn't licensed costs much more money in man-hours,
equipment usage, travel expenses, etc. There needs to be monitoring and
DFing, at least one warning notice, more monitoring and DFing, a request
for station inspection, more monitoring and DFing, etc, etc, etc. This
is done because once an NAL is issued, the evidence needs to be very
nearly unimpeachable to avoid legal challenges in court, which would
cost even more money in court fees and lawyers. That's why when you -do-
hear of a CBer getting busted the violations are usually quite
extensive. On the other hand, it's easy to bust a ham because a lot of
the legal process is eliminated by the fact that the violator is
licensed -- the license pre-empts most of the issues upon which a legal
challenge could be made. All they need to do is record a few illegal
transmissions, do a DF and audio comparison against legal transmissions
where the ham identifies himself, then cite the ham for a violation
against his license. Very cheap and easy.
_
As it should be.

Landturd wrote:


Really JUJU, why is it that 99% of the hams are busted, only
10% of cb's busted? Please don't say it's the money, 10K is
10K, no matter who pays it.

Landshark


Concetrate hard and see if you can comprehend. If not any six year old
can explaine it to you.

The FCC dosen't give a crap about the cb band anymore. Any idiot can get
away with most anything there now. As for those who stray outside the cb
bands, like into the 10 meter band and operate without a license, they
are more likely to get caught. The FCC still values ham radio, that is
why wayward hams and other illegal ops on the ham bands are likely to
get caught. And by the way, 99% of the hams don't get busted, 99+
percent of the hams are operating legally, while 99+ percent of the
cbers are operating illegally.

Leland C. Scott wrote:

"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...

The I-85 incidents were reported by one Jerry W. Oxendine, K4KWH. Those
trucking companies have been contacted and made aware. The accused have
a right to know their accuser.


I'll bet they sent him a thank you note, that is if it really was him.


And it is pure speculation on twistie's part that it was Jerry.

JJ wrote:
Landturd wrote:

Really JUJU, why is it that 99% of the hams are busted, only
10% of cb's busted? Please don't say it's the money, 10K is
10K, no matter who pays it.

Landshark


Concetrate hard and see if you can comprehend. If not any six year old
can explaine it to you.

Is a six year old about to explain it below?


The FCC dosen't give a crap about the cb band anymore.

They haven't in years. Btw jj, when is the last time -you-
used a CB radio?

"JJ" wrote in message
...
Landturd wrote:

Fine JJ, sorry for what the spell check did, I didn't look
to see what it corrected
V
V
Really JUJU, why is it that 99% of the hams are busted, only
10% of cb's busted? Please don't say it's the money, 10K is
10K, no matter who pays it.

Landshark


Concetrate hard and see if you can comprehend. If not any six year old
can explaine it to you.

Ok, lets see if the others will listen

The FCC dosen't give a crap about the cb band anymore. Any idiot can get
away with most anything there now. As for those who stray outside the cb
bands, like into the 10 meter band and operate without a license, they
are more likely to get caught. The FCC still values ham radio, that is
why wayward hams and other illegal ops on the ham bands are likely to
get caught.

Agreed, no doubt about that.

And by the way, 99% of the hams don't get busted, 99+
percent of the hams are operating legally, while 99+ percent of the
cbers are operating illegally.

My point is that you are using a pretty wide paint brush, with no
facts at all to back that up. That's why I said that JJ, you can say
and think what you want, but you wrong on both accounts.

Landshark


--
That does suck..sometimes you're the
windshield..sometimes you're the bug.

"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
N7VCF wrote:
Busting someone that isn't licensed costs much more money in man-hours,
equipment usage, travel expenses, etc. There needs to be monitoring and
DFing, at least one warning notice, more monitoring and DFing, a request
for station inspection, more monitoring and DFing, etc, etc, etc. This
is done because once an NAL is issued, the evidence needs to be very
nearly unimpeachable to avoid legal challenges in court, which would
cost even more money in court fees and lawyers. That's why when you -do-
hear of a CBer getting busted the violations are usually quite
extensive. On the other hand, it's easy to bust a ham because a lot of
the legal process is eliminated by the fact that the violator is
licensed -- the license pre-empts most of the issues upon which a legal
challenge could be made. All they need to do is record a few illegal
transmissions, do a DF and audio comparison against legal transmissions
where the ham identifies himself, then cite the ham for a violation
against his license. Very cheap and easy.
_
As it should be.

I guess that's what Frank wrote............100% correct.

The point is that making a statement that 99% of cb'rs
operate illegally is false, just as 99% of hams get busted
for operating illegally.

Landshark