Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#91
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#93
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lancer" wrote in message ... On 16 Jun 2004 13:01:45 -0700, (I Am Not George) wrote: in wrote: On 16 Jun 2004 12:13:45 -0700, (I Am Not George) wrote: lol remember I said if you want efficient youd be using a 9 ft whip. even bent over like a bow the 9 ft is more efficient than a 4 ft loaded open air coil model. then asshole said wrote Huh......... A bent over 9 foot whip has a very noticeable Loss compared to a efficient 4 or 5 foot vertical. now hoople head says wrote Modeling, showed that the Max Horizontal field is broadside to the antenna and Max vertical is more inline with the direction that its bent. Does your news server carry alt.binaries.pictures.radio? I put a jpeg of it there. Red is The Hor field, Black is the Vert I dont see any big loss there tnom I see only gain gain and more gain. Yes clip your whip Barney style and point the car in the direction you want to talk and you got gain, no illegal amp needed lol I didn't write "modeling....." from above, but it is common sense that when an antenna rotates away from its vertical polarization it also rotates away from its original vertical gain. This is really bizare Tnom and Lancer post within minutes of each other and both from ax.com too lol. I tell you what tnom or lancer or whatever you call youself now you need to model a 4 foot open coil type antenna sitting on a Barney police car and compare it to a full 9 ft in a Barney Bend configuration on the same police car. No watergates and whistling auuudio into echo mikes and watching the swang do it right this time. LOL!! what a dumbass, you don't know what ax.com is? Damn, We are both Frank too, he posts with ax.com.. What a dimwit. You mean he didn't know that was a post made with Forte Agent? I thought George knew how to read headers? LMAO!!!! Landshark -- Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen. |
#94
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Landshark" wrote:
"Lancer" wrote in message .. . On 16 Jun 2004 13:01:45 -0700, (I Am Not George) wrote: in wrote: On 16 Jun 2004 12:13:45 -0700, (I Am Not George) wrote: lol remember I said if you want efficient youd be using a 9 ft whip. even bent over like a bow the 9 ft is more efficient than a 4 ft loaded open air coil model. then asshole said wrote Huh......... A bent over 9 foot whip has a very noticeable Loss compared to a efficient 4 or 5 foot vertical. now hoople head says wrote Modeling, showed that the Max Horizontal field is broadside to the antenna and Max vertical is more inline with the direction that its bent. Does your news server carry alt.binaries.pictures.radio? I put a jpeg of it there. Red is The Hor field, Black is the Vert I dont see any big loss there tnom I see only gain gain and more gain. Yes clip your whip Barney style and point the car in the direction you want to talk and you got gain, no illegal amp needed lol I didn't write "modeling....." from above, but it is common sense that when an antenna rotates away from its vertical polarization it also rotates away from its original vertical gain. This is really bizare Tnom and Lancer post within minutes of each other and both from ax.com too lol. I tell you what tnom or lancer or whatever you call youself now you need to model a 4 foot open coil type antenna sitting on a Barney police car and compare it to a full 9 ft in a Barney Bend configuration on the same police car. No watergates and whistling auuudio into echo mikes and watching the swang do it right this time. LOL!! what a dumbass, you don't know what ax.com is? Damn, We are both Frank too, he posts with ax.com.. What a dimwit. You mean he didn't know that was a post made with Forte Agent? I thought George knew how to read headers? LMAO!!!! Landshark You shouldnt even be reading these posts what happened to your nonexistant killfile lol |
#95
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , (Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) This little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell, "AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order. Oh really? I don't think I have ever typed "akc" in any of my posts until now. Results 1 - 10 of about 402 for "Sparky" "akc". (0.60 seconds)=A0 Sorted by relevance=A0 =A0Sort by date Related groups:=A0=A0rec.radio.cb Very good, Twist. LOL. Hey Frank, you should use a webtv somewhere some time. You're having problems following who's who and need to understand how the thing works. Now search through each one and count how many of those occurances were quoted from another post instead of typed by me. Process of elimination serves quite nicely here. Check only those in the search that are from you which contain the term "akc". You've used the term quite regularly. Sobriety would permit return of your retainment and not have you lying and claiming otherwise. |
#96
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: (iamnotiamnotgeorge2004)
In , (Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) In , wrote: Many times...........even tested them. Sorry your tests results were debunked by Frank in the xterminator thread, you are a voodoo tech (Frank never tested any of the antennas.) I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the top was parallel with the ground (pointing East, if that makes a difference). Measurements were compared to the antenna straight up.......; SWR didn't change at all, and vertically polarized field strength dropped by a hair. owever, horizontally polarized field strength made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the lanyard. But,,,,there is supposed to be no skip... Who said anything about skip, Twist? Go to the local flea market and buy a cheap webtv, Frank. You're cornfused again and are calling everyone "twist". What is "the toilet bowl"? I was assuming you referred to 6 since you have a perpetual menstruation concerning skip and big radios. Since you were listening to 6, you were hearing skip, as you damn sure weren't listening local. Some weak signals disappeared while others came in that weren't there before. And those "weak" signals must have been local, since you are playing semantic word games and essentially claiming there was no skip. Let the whip go back to vertical and the old signals came back while the new signals were lost. Looks like it's a compromise situation. =A0 It is. You failed to account for, or at least detail, a myriad of factors. Were you in a free zone? No, I pay taxes just like every other homeowner. All you had to say was you were wrong, you don;t have to cry about it. After all, one wouldn't expect any experiment performed by yourself yield anything other than subjective results. _ How near was the closest object? The curb was right next to the truck. Gee, maybe that messed up my test..... Your incompetence did that. _ Did you have a duplicate antenna in which to compare duplicate tests? Yes I did. Did I use it? No. Flawing your subjected reportings even further. Did you repeat the test with the antenna on the opposite side of the vehicle? The antenna not mounted on either side of the vehicle. It was mounted on the front of the vehicle, which I clearly stated and you couldn't comprehend because of your communication deficit. To be fair, you need spoon fed and asked may things twice, because you have problems making yourself clear and once you say something, you often must reclarify yourself because you maintain what you wrote wasn't esxactly what you meant. Add to this your repeated homage via liberal quoting of myself, and there we have it. Did you move the vehicle around? Why yes, it started break-dancing as soon as I keyed the mic. =A0=A0 LOL,,,,,no need for the sarcasm,,,,I understand your reluctance to discuss your limitations. None really needed me to point out your flawed test, as most caught it as soon as you posted your incompetence. A single day's atmospheric condition for a single test? Sunny, 74 degrees, 20% humidity, 29.96 in/Hg, tree and grass pollen were moderate, weed pollen was low, mold spores were high, no measurable seismic activity and the aurora monitor was quiet. Now duplicate your tests in addition to your climate. =A0=A0One perfunctory test is meaningless in the context of science. Unless the test is conclusive. One test can never be be conclusive in such applied logistics. Once again you are confusing inductive and deductive logic, Not at all, you''re confusing my objective logic with your subjective results. but that's no suprise since the only part of the book you studied was the chapter on logical fallacies. Toss all the one liner insults you need in order to soothe your low self-esteem. If I wouldn't have pointed out your incompetence concerning your monkey acts, ignorance, and inability to differentiate between objective and subjective results, another most certainly would have. |
#97
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: (iamnotlancer2004)
In , Lancer wrote: On 16 Jun 2004 13:01:45 -0700, (I Am Not George) wrote: in wrote: On 16 Jun 2004 12:13:45 -0700, (I Am Not George) wrote: lol remember I said if you want efficient youd be using a 9 ft whip. even bent over like a bow the 9 ft is more efficient than a 4 ft loaded open air coil model. then asshole said wrote Huh......... A bent over 9 foot whip has a very noticeable Loss compared to a efficient 4 or 5 foot vertical. now hoople head says wrote =A0=A0Modeling, showed that the Max Horizontal field is broadside to the antenna and Max vertical is more inline with the direction that its bent. Does your news server carry alt.binaries.pictures.radio? I put a jpeg of it there. Red is The Hor field, Black is the Vert I dont see any big loss there tnom I see only gain gain and more gain. Yes clip your whip Barney style and point the car in the direction you want to talk and you got gain, no illegal amp needed lol _ I didn't write "modeling....." from above, but it is common sense that when an antenna rotates away from its vertical polarization it also rotates away from its original vertical gain. _ This is really bizare Tnom and Lancer post within minutes of each other and both from ax.com too lol. I tell you what tnom or lancer or whatever you call youself now you need to model a 4 foot open coil type antenna sitting on a Barney police car and compare it to a full 9 ft in a Barney Bend configuration on the same police car. No watergates and whistling auuudio into echo mikes and watching the swang do it right this time. (LOL!! what a dumbass, you don't know what ax.com is? Damn, We are both Frank too, he posts with ax.com.. What a dimwit. ) _ That's Twisty-logic. Hehehe,,,poor Frank,,,invoking twist at all costs. Couple this with his alcoholism and the old boy is off and runing. He thought Leland and myself were the same person because we both posted through Supernews. Yet, here you are blaming another for your own actions. The fact that you felt such logic good enough to put into practice for yourself illustrates your homage, but I like the manner which you need blame someone else for your actions, to the point of sharing with us how "Twisty-logic" has a hold of you and how Twistedmania has run wild on you. Hope you find sobriety, Frank. You weren't nearly as obsessed with me as you are when you drink. Each day and in all your posts, I'm in your thoughts, emails,,,,lol,,,,,you do get a free pass on your behavior, though, as alcoholism is a disease, thereby rendering you incompetent and in need. -----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! |
#98
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#99
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Thu, Jun 17, 2004, 7:58am (EDT-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Ideas for a homemade mobile antenna. From: =A0=A0 itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge User-Agent: =A0=A0 Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0 Thu, Jun 17, 2004, 7:58am (EDT-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0 sv3-GTj7aWRCp7VrPD0ZIBLy5A9hv6WaWzW8uL0LAUH0qHyvVvZSbF aLeqHftl/LkJlBZW//Fi= fPyrd5gI5!57+bvlK2MfFAUaRxIUIFnkbF36psVt/mxnM6jipX99wKrTxuI7sDNKd3thIbQokn= vQawfA=3D=3D X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.1 (I Am Not George) wrote in m: You shouldnt even be reading these posts what happened to your nonexistant killfile lol That is what i was thinkin to Jim Calling Frank "Jim" and desperately and redundantly claiming "Frank isn't Iamnotgerge2004" simply won't make it so. Move on from yourself. You're a louse and are being made to live with it. |
#100
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote in message ... (I Am Not George) wrote in m: You shouldnt even be reading these posts what happened to your nonexistant killfile lol That is what i was thinkin to Jim My name is Frank get it right little bro. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Ideas for a home built 2meter/440 dual band base antenna | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
Need HF / Mobile Antenna Recommendation | Antenna | |||
Wanted: SWAN Mobile Antenna Info | Antenna |