Not really, have you tested any antennas?

I have tested many antennas , have you?

I must butt in now........Just what antennas did you test?
Name them.

On 15 Jun 2004 12:35:27 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)itoldyouiamnotiamnotg wrote:
Lancer wrote in news:nartc0lgg15n6sbnhpalkg87uup40v96o8@
4ax.com:


Not really, have you tested any antennas?

I have tested many antennas , have you?


take it away lil bro, ROTFLMMFAO

Who are you laughing at? Yourself? You misquoted a post.

Scared to quote the original?

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:14:44 -0400, (Nicolai
Carpathia) wrote:
Landshark wrote:
LOL!!! I love it. All I do is type Ditto to "LMAO" and notice Geo calls
ME a hypocrite. He should talk, right BP. He defends Doug a known Felon,
repeater jammer, porn poster, spammer, nut case. Leland defends Doug
too, so George has no legs to stand on when calling other people
hypocrites.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0La ndshark
_
Frank and Hall and both ran to defend N8WWM on many occasions, too. This
little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell,
"AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who
pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order.



I have also NEVER

defended any actions that Doug has been

proven guilty of.



That's only because you claim those reported by the FCC on the
rainreport
do not constitute guilt of which the FCC claims..
Nevertheless,,,here are but a few of your defenses of Dogie. As
pertaining to his bust, taken from "king of clowns busted" and "n8wwm
makes rainreport""

N3CVJ wrote:
" .......the complaint was withdrawn because

there was either insufficient evidence, or it

was

shown that Doug was not the person doing the
jamming."


No,,the complaint was NOT withdrawn, as is standard procedure, Dogie was
sent a warning via certified snail mail, like the majority of other
first time offenders.
Here's my personal favorite personification fo what makes you the grand
mastah poobah who holds court in the Hypocrite Hall....the one of you
justifying Dogie's illegal actions by pointing to others.......


"Whatever he did, he did because he doesn't

like people like you, who have little respect for

the law.



Of course, we have the more entertaining, liberal, tear-jerking, choker
you wrote in regards to Doug getting busted.... :



I have a habit of standing up for the little guy,

when a bunch of people gang up on them.

especially when the little guy is right.



Hahaha...no you don't Davie. In fact, you can illustrate NO thread, NO
topic in which you "stood up for the little guy" where a " bunch of
people gang up" on him. And Dogie was not right, at any time.
The ONLY people you have ever defended in here have been N8, Lelnad, and
Frank.
In fact, google Dogie's call, along with "sandbagger" and you are right
there in each and every thread, arguing vehemently and acting like
Dogie's arm-chair lawyer,,,,joined by the three stooges of Frank,
Lelnad, and Geogre.
But,,,,let's illustrate how close you actually claimed you were to the
situation........you wrote:


"........there are people, that are in the know,

that have filled me in on some of the smaller

details".





The FCC were the ones "in the know",,,not your mysterious non-existent
"people". The complaint came from club members (those "in-the-know").
And then here is the one where you claim it could be Chuck-eye who was
impersonating Dogie to frame him and the possibility was being
investigated by the FCC.......hehhhehe......ah, never mind,,the post is
there in those threads for all to enjoy,,,,, but don't say you didn't
defend Dogie when he got busted. It's an outright lie.

"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote
in message ...
wrote in :


Not really, have you tested any antennas?

I have tested many antennas , have you?

I must butt in now........Just what antennas did you test?
Name them.

Do you want CB antennas or all antennas I have tested, I also have a
indoor
antenna test area where I scale all antennas down 20x and can test them
on
a scaled down vehicle. If you have the know how and decent test equipment
suprising what you can do. And the results are repeatable.


I did the same thing with scaled down versions of the Saturn 5 booster for
the moon program, but they only went to Geo's neighborhood. One of 'em hit
him in the head.

"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote
in message ...
"I ain't George either" wrote in
:


"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote in message ...
wrote in
:


Not really, have you tested any antennas?

I have tested many antennas , have you?

I must butt in now........Just what antennas did you test?
Name them.

Do you want CB antennas or all antennas I have tested, I also have a
indoor
antenna test area where I scale all antennas down 20x and can test
them
on
a scaled down vehicle. If you have the know how and decent test
equipment suprising what you can do. And the results are repeatable.


I did the same thing with scaled down versions of the Saturn 5 booster
for the moon program, but they only went to Geo's neighborhood. One of
'em hit him in the head.

How long did it take you to think of that one randy?

6 seconds. Much less time than you dreaming you have a research facility in
your trailer.

"I ain't George either" wrote in message
...

"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote
in message ...
"I ain't George either" wrote in
:


"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote in message ...
wrote in
:


Not really, have you tested any antennas?

I have tested many antennas , have you?

I must butt in now........Just what antennas did you test?
Name them.

Do you want CB antennas or all antennas I have tested, I also have a
indoor
antenna test area where I scale all antennas down 20x and can test
them
on
a scaled down vehicle. If you have the know how and decent test
equipment suprising what you can do. And the results are repeatable.


I did the same thing with scaled down versions of the Saturn 5 booster
for the moon program, but they only went to Geo's neighborhood. One of
'em hit him in the head.

How long did it take you to think of that one randy?

6 seconds. Much less time than you dreaming you have a research facility
in
your trailer.



Geo, I'm quite quick on my feet, and I'm an asshole. But then again, I'm not
a malicious asshole. Most things I do are in good fun. The way I see things,
albeit sometimes myopic, is that people need to understand that they don't
really matter in the grand scheme of things. That's my purpose with most of
my comments. Any of us could leave Earth tomorrow, and would it matter? Not
a bit. To our families and friends, yes, but in the bigger picture, not at
all. That's why I *sometimes* enjoy hassling you and others here. I have no
hate for anyone here. You can't hurt me. The only individuals who *can* do
that are people you allow to do so.

Toodles until I again deem you worth my time,

Randy

In ,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:14:44 -0400, (Nicolai
Carpathia) wrote:
Landshark wrote:
LOL!!! I love it. All I do is type Ditto to "LMAO" and notice Geo calls
ME a hypocrite. He should talk, right BP. He defends Doug a known Felon,
repeater jammer, porn poster, spammer, nut case. Leland defends Doug
too, so George has no legs to stand on when calling other people
hypocrites.
****************Landshark
_
Frank and Hall and both ran to defend N8WWM on many occasions, too.


......hmmmm, when did I ever do that? I seem to recall as early as Jan
of 2001 that I didn't agree with his methods, but I also pointed out
that he was just mirroring the behavior of those that didn't like his
pro-legal position. And one of those people (and probably several of
your "internet personalities") was you, Twisty. If I was defending him
then I was also defending you. So what are you whining about?


This
little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell,
"AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who
pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order.


Oh really? I don't think I have ever typed "akc" in any of my posts
until now. But just for kicks, let's see where this term originated:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...rp1. deja.com

And if you want the first occurance of "AKC" in rrcb then:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...1.news.aol.com


So have you found a job yet? Or do you still make your mommy work two
jobs to support you?





=============

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah
http://tinyurl.com/2yor7
http://tinyurl.com/2sapq
(Twisty cast the first stone)

=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."

"...but as usual, your best simpl isn;t good enough."

"Athis is how proper communication wroks..."

---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:52:36 -0500, itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:

wrote in :


Not really, have you tested any antennas?

I have tested many antennas , have you?

I must butt in now........Just what antennas did you test?
Name them.

Do you want CB antennas or all antennas I have tested, I also have a indoor
antenna test area where I scale all antennas down 20x and can test them on
a scaled down vehicle. If you have the know how and decent test equipment
suprising what you can do. And the results are repeatable.

Stay on topic......What CB mobile antennas have you tested?

itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge )
wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote in
om:



take it away lil bro, ROTFLMMFAO


sorry to step on your toes. you know me and my antennas.

no problem be my guest. these guys use watergates and s-meter readings
to validate there so called tests lol

In , wrote:


Many times...........even tested them.


Sorry your tests results were debunked by Frank in the xterminator
thread, you are a voodoo tech

Frank never tested any of the antennas.


I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied
it back so the top was parallel with the ground (pointing East, if
that makes a difference). Measurements were compared to the antenna
straight up.......;

SWR didn't change at all, and vertically polarized field strength
dropped by a hair. However, horizontally polarized field strength made
a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I listened to the toilet bowl
while pulling on the lanyard. Some weak signals disappeared while
others came in that weren't there before. Let the whip go back to
vertical and the old signals came back while the new signals were
lost.

Looks like it's a compromise situation.


Frank as well as you still
believes the earth is flat.


http://www.art.com/asp/sp.asp?PD=10036654&RFID=490797







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----