| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#61
June 16th 04, 04:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"I ain't George either" wrote in message ... "I ain't George either" wrote in message ... "itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote in message ... "I ain't George either" wrote in : "itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote in message ... wrote in : Not really, have you tested any antennas? I have tested many antennas , have you? I must butt in now........Just what antennas did you test? Name them. Do you want CB antennas or all antennas I have tested, I also have a indoor antenna test area where I scale all antennas down 20x and can test them on a scaled down vehicle. If you have the know how and decent test equipment suprising what you can do. And the results are repeatable. I did the same thing with scaled down versions of the Saturn 5 booster for the moon program, but they only went to Geo's neighborhood. One of 'em hit him in the head. How long did it take you to think of that one randy? 6 seconds. Much less time than you dreaming you have a research facility in your trailer. Geo, I'm quite quick on my feet, and I'm an asshole. But then again, I'm not a malicious asshole. Most things I do are in good fun. The way I see things, albeit sometimes myopic, is that people need to understand that they don't really matter in the grand scheme of things. That's my purpose with most of my comments. Any of us could leave Earth tomorrow, and would it matter? Not a bit. To our families and friends, yes, but in the bigger picture, not at all. That's why I *sometimes* enjoy hassling you and others here. I have no hate for anyone here. You can't hurt me. The only individuals who *can* do that are people you allow to do so. Toodles until I again deem you worth my time, Randy Very well said Randy, Thank you!!!! Landshark -- Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen. |
|
#62
June 16th 04, 04:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steveo" wrote in message ... itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: wrote in : Not really, have you tested any antennas? I have tested many antennas , have you? I must butt in now........Just what antennas did you test? Name them. Do you want CB antennas or all antennas I have tested, I also have a indoor antenna test area where I scale all antennas down 20x and can test them on a scaled down vehicle. If you have the know how and decent test equipment suprising what you can do. And the results are repeatable. Show pictures or stfu with your lies. LMAO!!! I can picture a Forrest Gump looking George Busch wa3moj sitting there trying to build his Revel models yelling "Momma" Landshark Now watch the foul language hate filled post come from him. -- That does suck..sometimes you're the windshield..sometimes you're the bug. |
|
#63
June 16th 04, 06:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#64
June 16th 04, 06:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#65
June 16th 04, 10:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stay on topic......What CB mobile antennas have you tested? wilson 1000, wilson 5000, Firestick,dr.crow, 10k, 102 whip. workman, big momma, mr.coily, golden rod, homebrew, 55, aluminum 1/4 wave. these are off the top of my head. Good. Now what procedure did you use to test the antennas? |
|
#67
June 16th 04, 01:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message ... itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: wrote in : Not really, have you tested any antennas? I have tested many antennas , have you? I must butt in now........Just what antennas did you test? Name them. Do you want CB antennas or all antennas I have tested, I also have a indoor antenna test area where I scale all antennas down 20x and can test them on a scaled down vehicle. If you have the know how and decent test equipment suprising what you can do. And the results are repeatable. Show pictures or stfu with your lies. LMAO!!! I can picture a Forrest Gump looking George Busch wa3moj sitting there trying to build his Revel models yelling "Momma" Landshark Now watch the foul language hate filled post come from him. LOL, "mom, i glued my fingers to my pecker again"!" -- I won't retire, but I might retread. |
|
#68
June 16th 04, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:22:33 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: In , wrote: Many times...........even tested them. Sorry your tests results were debunked by Frank in the xterminator thread, you are a voodoo tech Frank never tested any of the antennas. I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the top was parallel with the ground (pointing East, if that makes a difference). Measurements were compared to the antenna straight up.......; SWR didn't change at all, and vertically polarized field strength dropped by a hair. However, horizontally polarized field strength made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the lanyard. Some weak signals disappeared while others came in that weren't there before. Let the whip go back to vertical and the old signals came back while the new signals were lost. Looks like it's a compromise situation. Frank Did you try it in Barney Phife mode? The start of this thread was on car, it was suggested that you tie it down like a bow. Bows are bent 180 degrees, so it would have to be tied down to the same level as the base. I tried it and the minimum SWR point moved lower in frequency. Modeling it showed that the take off angle also increased. Maybe causing the effect you were seeing. |
|
#69
June 16th 04, 02:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lancer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:22:33 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , wrote: Many times...........even tested them. Sorry your tests results were debunked by Frank in the xterminator thread, you are a voodoo tech Frank never tested any of the antennas. I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the top was parallel with the ground (pointing East, if that makes a difference). Measurements were compared to the antenna straight up.......; SWR didn't change at all, and vertically polarized field strength dropped by a hair. However, horizontally polarized field strength made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the lanyard. Some weak signals disappeared while others came in that weren't there before. Let the whip go back to vertical and the old signals came back while the new signals were lost. Looks like it's a compromise situation. Frank Did you try it in Barney Phife mode? The start of this thread was on car, it was suggested that you tie it down like a bow. Bows are bent 180 degrees, so it would have to be tied down to the same level as the base. I tried it and the minimum SWR point moved lower in frequency. Modeling it showed that the take off angle also increased. Maybe causing the effect you were seeing. Think you could talk flatside dx with it in that position? Which direction did it talk best? -- I won't retire, but I might retread. |
|
#70
June 16th 04, 03:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 16 Jun 2004 12:18:50 GMT, Steveo
wrote: Lancer wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:22:33 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , wrote: Many times...........even tested them. Sorry your tests results were debunked by Frank in the xterminator thread, you are a voodoo tech Frank never tested any of the antennas. I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the top was parallel with the ground (pointing East, if that makes a difference). Measurements were compared to the antenna straight up.......; SWR didn't change at all, and vertically polarized field strength dropped by a hair. However, horizontally polarized field strength made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the lanyard. Some weak signals disappeared while others came in that weren't there before. Let the whip go back to vertical and the old signals came back while the new signals were lost. Looks like it's a compromise situation. Frank Did you try it in Barney Phife mode? The start of this thread was on car, it was suggested that you tie it down like a bow. Bows are bent 180 degrees, so it would have to be tied down to the same level as the base. I tried it and the minimum SWR point moved lower in frequency. Modeling it showed that the take off angle also increased. Maybe causing the effect you were seeing. Think you could talk flatside dx with it in that position? Which direction did it talk best? Steve; I didn't play with it all that much to see which direction it talked the best. Modeling, showed that the Max Horizontal field is broadside to the antenna and Max vertical is more inline with the direction that its bent. Does your news server carry alt.binaries.pictures.radio? I put a jpeg of it there. Red is The Hor field, Black is the Vert |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Ideas for a home built 2meter/440 dual band base antenna | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
| Need HF / Mobile Antenna Recommendation | Antenna | |||
| Wanted: SWAN Mobile Antenna Info | Antenna | |||
Linear Mode
