I haven't seen Jerry say anything nasty about anyone. Sometimes the truth
hurts

Best regards from Rochester, NY
Jim


"Anonymous Sender" wrote in message
acolo.com...
TAKE

JERRY

OXENDINE

WITH

YOU

HES

A

BIG

PART

OF


****ING

UP

REC

RADIO

CB

Tommy can you hear me?








Please come and get your lid kc8ldo from rec.radio.cb. Since identifying
this lid as a source of mayhem and a six meter problem operator, he has
taken his circus act to the internet.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.713 / Virus Database: 469 - Release Date: 6/30/04

"Jim Hampton" wrote:
I haven't seen Jerry say anything nasty about anyone. Sometimes the
truth hurts

Anonymous Sender's are lower than a snakes belly.

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
"Jim Hampton" wrote:
I haven't seen Jerry say anything nasty about anyone. Sometimes the
truth hurts

Anonymous Sender's are lower than a snakes belly.

That is a given fact. They want to slam or slander someone and hide behind
an anonymizing site.

73,
Jim


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.713 / Virus Database: 469 - Release Date: 6/30/04

From: (Steveo)
"Jim Hampton" wrote:
I haven't seen Jerry say anything nasty about anyone. Sometimes the
truth hurts

Anonymous Sender's are lower than a snakes

belly.


To be fair, Jerry has caused much problems. in the trucking group, but
not here. I had my own issue here with Jerry concerning his actions on a
single occasion, but I don't hold grudges like I force some others to
do. I agree he didn't say anything nasty. In fact, never has this group
went so long without his name appearing in the posts (*).

On 01 Jul 2004 01:53:55 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

"Jim Hampton" wrote:
I haven't seen Jerry say anything nasty about anyone. Sometimes the
truth hurts

Anonymous Sender's are lower than a snakes belly.


One could say the same thing about fictitious "handles". They are just
as anonymous.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Dave Hall wrote:
On 01 Jul 2004 01:53:55 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

"Jim Hampton" wrote:
I haven't seen Jerry say anything nasty about anyone. Sometimes the
truth hurts

Anonymous Sender's are lower than a snakes belly.

One could say the same thing about fictitious "handles". They are just
as anonymous.

Not exactly, remailers show no path or nsp.

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On 01 Jul 2004 01:53:55 GMT, Steveo
wrote:
"Jim Hampton" wrote:
I haven't seen Jerry say anything nasty about anyone. Sometimes the
truth hurts
_
Anonymous Sender's are lower than a snakes belly.

One could say the same thing about fictitious

"handles". They are just as anonymous.

Dave

"Sandbagger



The only "one" who "could" say such things is you and the rest of the
N8WWM trouble-making crew of lids.
CB IS anonymous handles...here you go once again whining about cb.
In addition, ALL security experts, privacy advocates, and ISPs ALL
stress the need for privacy on the net..............don't get mad at
those who practice internet safety just because you continue to make
poor decisions regarding your own life and internet practices.

From: (Steveo)
Dave Hall wrote:
On 01 Jul 2004 01:53:55 GMT, Steveo
wrote:
"Jim Hampton" wrote:
I haven't seen Jerry say anything nasty about anyone. Sometimes the
truth hurts
-
Anonymous Sender's are lower than a snakes belly.



(One could say the same thing about fictitious "handles". They are just
as anonymous.)


Not exactly, remailers show no path or nsp.



Facts like those always confuse those sustained by a perpetual one-sided
diet of ignorance.

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:57:09 -0400, (Nicolai
Carpathia) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On 01 Jul 2004 01:53:55 GMT, Steveo
wrote:
"Jim Hampton" wrote:
I haven't seen Jerry say anything nasty about anyone. Sometimes the
truth hurts
_
Anonymous Sender's are lower than a snakes belly.

One could say the same thing about fictitious

"handles". They are just as anonymous.

Dave

"Sandbagger



The only "one" who "could" say such things is you and the rest of the
N8WWM trouble-making crew of lids.
CB IS anonymous handles...here you go once again whining about cb.
In addition, ALL security experts, privacy advocates, and ISPs ALL
stress the need for privacy on the net..............don't get mad at
those who practice internet safety just because you continue to make
poor decisions regarding your own life and internet practices.


I find it just a bit hypocritical for someone to have the unmitigated
gaul to complain about anonymous posters who use resenders, while
they, themselves, hide behind a fake name. As long as someone conceals
their identity, they cannot be held accountable for their actions.
Therefore the things that they do and the ideas that they put forth
are already suspect, and lack the same credibility as the same ideas
coming from someone who's identity is easily verifiable.

Only the gutless hide from the truth.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:57:09 -0400, (Nicolai
Carpathia) wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On 01 Jul 2004 01:53:55 GMT, Steveo
wrote:
"Jim Hampton" wrote: I haven't seen Jerry say
anything nasty about anyone. Sometimes the truth hurts
_
Anonymous Sender's are lower than a snakes belly.
-
One could say the same thing about fictitious
"handles". They are just as anonymous.
Dave
"Sandbagger
-
The only "one" who "could" say such things is you and the rest of the
N8WWM trouble-making crew of lids.
CB IS anonymous handles...here you go once again whining about cb. In
addition, ALL security experts, privacy advocates, and ISPs ALL
stress the need for privacy on the net..............don't get mad at
those who practice internet safety just because you continue to make
poor decisions regarding your own life and internet practices.
_
I find it just a bit hypocritical



What you "find", think, feel, and believe is irrelevant. You have
effectively demonstrated your views as extremely radical and fascist.
Such views are shared by the minority, the troublemakers among us, of
who you have defended on many occasion.


for someone to

have the unmitigated gaul to complain about

anonymous posters who use resenders, while

they, themselves, hide behind a fake name.


And just who are you attacking now, Davie?
Who complained about anonymous posters that you are accusing of using
resenders?


As long as someone conceals their identity,

they cannot be held accountable for their

actions.



Pure ignorance. If one breaks the law, the isp will give one up faster
than you reduce yourself with attacks on those with opposing views that
differ from your own.



Therefore the things that they do and the

ideas that they put forth are already suspect,



Again, the fact that you openly disagree with ALL security experts and
isp's concerning identity protection illustrates your problems and level
of intellect concerning the net,,identity theft is at an all-time high,
and as an often-imitated-never-duplicated popular caricature, it is
clear your yearning for others identities are nefarious, as real-world
id's are irrelevant on cb and in this forum.
Do not blame the rest of the enlightened world who follow security
protocol in protecting their id and who failed to make the same ignorant
mistake you did that trashed your name and reputation.
After all these years, you are still kicking yourself in the ass for
your huge self-inflicted wounds, yet you continue to attack others for
protecting what you failed to protect.



and lack the same credibility as the same

ideas coming from someone who's identity is

easily verifiable.

Only the gutless hide from the truth.

Dave

"Sandbagger"


Only those severely obsesses with others id's for nefarious purposes
would equate following
internet, worldwide, accepted security protocol
with "hiding", but then again, that is exactly what most educated people
do, Davie, they HIDE their personal identities from internet kooks like
yourself who want nothing more than personal informaiton and identities
of internet personalities.