Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:43:16 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:29:17 -0500, "Dave VanHorn" wrote in : "Southern Kiwi" wrote in message ... Can I use my old coax and mounts from my 26 mhz days on a new uhf rig? Probably, but how much of your signal do you want to waste, heating up the coax? With some types, it wouldn't be a surprise to see 3/4 of your power lost between the rig and the antenna.. Andrews LMR-400 is good, as is all large hardline. If the line is short, the type won't make much difference unless it's RG-174 (really thin stuff). E.g, for a length of 18' @ 500 MHz I got the following loss figures: 1/2" HL -- 0.3 dB RG-17 -- 0.3 9913 -- 0.5 RG-8 -- 0.9 RG-58 -- 1.5 RG-174 -- 4.9 N connectors are much better than the old "UHF" connectors (so named when 30 MHz was "Ultra-high frequency") I don't know where you get your information but it's wrong. UHF connectors work fine for UHF. And to the best of my knowledge, the current limits of the UHF spectrum (300 MHz to 3 GHz) were defined long before the connectors ever existed. Frank; Back in the 40's UHF was defined a low as 100 MHZ. I had a friend in school that had a Hallicrafters S-36A, covered 27 to 143 MHZ. S-36's were made in the 40's. The front panel had a "logo" on it, " Ultra High Frequency Communications Receiver". I think that the UHF connectors first showed up in the mid 1930's. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steveo wrote in message ...
"Leland C. Scott" wrote: "Steveo" wrote in message ... "Leland C. Scott" wrote: "Steveo" wrote in message ... Why? You don't want to meet me next weekend? So where are you going to be at? Read the email, nad. What's wrong? Can't muster up the courage to publicly answer the question? This is now between you and I, I've told you where I'll be. Now lets see who is lacking the courage to run his pie hole to my face, you ****ing coward. You hide your identity, I've told you my real name, you keep insisting I'm Peebles since you've claimed to have ran my plate from the last visit. scared to publicly answer my question as to where exactly you will be at I'll be in Madison heights Michigan for three days, attending the Woodward dream cruise. This is old news already, pussy. can't be trusted and isn't worth wasting my time on. Huh? You said I'd never show up, and I'd never tell you the details, well I'm doing both and now you can't waste your time!? what details? you didnt email anything that is a lie leland and n8 are in qrz. you have no real name and no real address you are nobody. the only way you can prove you went somewhere is with pictures ROTFLMFAO and even then it might be some one else taking them not you lol |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Frank; Back in the 40's UHF was defined a low as 100 MHZ. I had a friend in school that had a Hallicrafters S-36A, covered 27 to 143 MHZ. S-36's were made in the 40's. The front panel had a "logo" on it, " Ultra High Frequency Communications Receiver". I think that the UHF connectors first showed up in the mid 1930's. These guys could argue for a month, over anything. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steveo" wrote in message ... This is now between you and I, I've told you where I'll be So there isn't a problem with refreshing my memory then is there? So where? Exactly. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steveo" wrote in message ... I've told you at least 50 times, Medina Ohio. Putz. Where's your street address chicken. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "I Am Not George" wrote in message m... "Leland C. Scott" wrote: "Steveo" wrote in message ... This is now between you and I, I've told you where I'll be So there isn't a problem with refreshing my memory then is there? So where? Exactly. you have every right to ask that question leland. email addresses can be faked. who knows who sent you that email. could be anybody. for that matter usenet posts can be faked. the only way to prove it is steve is to get his real name phone number and address. other wise its a waste of your time. Steveo is a waste of everybody's time. I offered to meet him once and he said it was too far to drive. He chickened out. You can do a google search to find the relevant post. Well he lied because he later claimed to have shown up at my apartment. Guess it wasn't too far after all. He was just too much of a chicken to meet me at the place I posted the address for the meeting. You can find that post as well. So I have zero reason to believe him whatever he says now. If he can't provide his real name, address, and phone number he can forget it. He has mine and I don't really give a flip. So what is he so scared of anyway? -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
Steveo is a waste of everybody's time. I offered to meet him once and he said it was too far to drive. He chickened out. You can do a google search to find the relevant post. Well he lied because he later claimed to have shown up at my apartment. Guess it wasn't too far after all. He was just too much of a chicken to meet me at the place I posted the address for the meeting. You can find that post as well. So I have zero reason to believe him whatever he says now. If he can't provide his real name, address, and phone number he can forget it. He has mine and I don't really give a flip. So what is he so scared of anyway? Hey Lee, read the email. -- Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change ready. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
custom antenna mounts | CB |