(I Am Not George) wrote:
If doug warned him about anything he warned him not to waste his time
on an anonymous stalker like you lol

Dogie was too 'skeered to come out and play in the street.

http://img16.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img16...fuglydogie.jpg

--
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change ready.

Steveo wrote in message ...
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Forget it leland. no one in their right mind would go somewhere to
meet an anonymous usenet poster who "says" he will be somewhere.
For all you know it some kids playing jokes with there fathers
computer

...and camera

exactly. your just an anonymous stalker with a camera. too scared to
let anoyone know your real name and address. what are you afraid of?
if you are such a tough guy then them knowing who you are shouldnt
make any difference to you.

"I Am Not George" wrote in message
m...
Steveo wrote in message
...
"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...

I've told you at least 50 times, Medina Ohio. Putz.

OK my name is Sterling Marlins and I live in Vienna VA.

Now you have as much info about me as I have about you LOL and they
are both unprovable


Where's your street address chicken.

I'll show you my drivers license this weekend, k?

Ewe got mail.


Forget it leland. no one in their right mind would go somewhere to
meet an anonymous usenet poster who "says" he will be somewhere. For
all you know it some kids playing jokes with there fathers computer

Much like you.

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:27:39 GMT, Lancer wrote in
:

snip
Ok, so I don't remember right:

http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/uhf.asp

Their explanation doesn't make much sense, but the connectors still
work fine for UHF.


Yes they do, I use them up to 1900 mhz, short runs of cable, with no
problems. Not sure what their loss is, but they are quite a bit
cheaper than N connectors.


Maybe you can explain that to Leland -- according to his calculations
and internet research, they shouldn't work at all at those freqs.





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"I ain't George either" wrote:
"I Am Not George" wrote in message
om...
Steveo wrote in message
...
"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...

I've told you at least 50 times, Medina Ohio. Putz.

OK my name is Sterling Marlins and I live in Vienna VA.

Now you have as much info about me as I have about you LOL and they
are both unprovable


Where's your street address chicken.

I'll show you my drivers license this weekend, k?

Ewe got mail.


Forget it leland. no one in their right mind would go somewhere to
meet an anonymous usenet poster who "says" he will be
somewhere. For
all you know it some kids playing jokes with there fathers computer

Much like you.

I may be anonymous but I am not sneaking around to people in the
groups houses leaving notes and taking pictures. I am not telling them
to meet me and threatening to beat them up. steveo is.

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
Regardless, I suggested that you -measure- this apparent loss, not
calculate it (.....gee, seems I've said that before.....).

I sent you a link to somebody who did using a RF network analyzer. He
reached the same conclusions I did. Give it a read.


--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

Wireless Network
Mobile computing
on the go brought
to you by Micro$oft

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
Maybe you can explain that to Leland -- according to his calculations
and internet research, they shouldn't work at all at those freqs.

Why don't you show everybody where I said they don't work. Same goes for the
link I sent you. That person did exactly what you proposed, used an
expensive RF network analyzer, and reached conclusions just the opposite
from yours.

http://www.qsl.net/vk3jeg/pl259tst.html

I'll let people read the paper for themselves. Nowhere does the aurthor say
"they shouldn't work at all at those freqs", which is a flat out lie on your
part.


--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

Wireless Network
Mobile computing
on the go brought
to you by Micro$oft

itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote in
om:


exactly. your just an anonymous stalker with a camera. too scared to
let anoyone know your real name and address. what are you afraid of?
if you are such a tough guy then them knowing who you are shouldnt
make any difference to you.


Bingo, you hit the nail right on the head.

high five, lil bro ; )

"I Am Not George" wrote in message
m...
"I ain't George either" wrote:
"I Am Not George" wrote in message
om...
Steveo wrote in message
...
"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...

I've told you at least 50 times, Medina Ohio. Putz.

OK my name is Sterling Marlins and I live in Vienna VA.

Now you have as much info about me as I have about you LOL and they
are both unprovable


Where's your street address chicken.

I'll show you my drivers license this weekend, k?

Ewe got mail.


Forget it leland. no one in their right mind would go somewhere to
meet an anonymous usenet poster who "says" he will be
somewhere. For
all you know it some kids playing jokes with there fathers computer

Much like you.

I may be anonymous but I am not sneaking around to people in the
groups houses leaving notes and taking pictures. I am not telling them
to meet me and threatening to beat them up. steveo is

And this bothers you why? Is your name Leland?

(I Am Not George) wrote:
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote in
om:


exactly. your just an anonymous stalker with a camera. too scared to
let anoyone know your real name and address. what are you afraid of?
if you are such a tough guy then them knowing who you are shouldnt
make any difference to you.


Bingo, you hit the nail right on the head.

high five, lil bro ; )

I got five for nad boy..check yore mailbox.