Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #69   Report Post  
Old August 18th 04, 02:07 PM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:11:14 -0400, "Leland C. Scott"
wrote in :


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
.. .
Maybe you can explain that to Leland -- according to his calculations
and internet research, they shouldn't work at all at those freqs.


Why don't you show everybody where I said they don't work. Same goes for the
link I sent you. That person did exactly what you proposed, used an
expensive RF network analyzer, and reached conclusions just the opposite
from yours.

http://www.qsl.net/vk3jeg/pl259tst.html

I'll let people read the paper for themselves. Nowhere does the aurthor say
"they shouldn't work at all at those freqs", which is a flat out lie on your
part.



It was a response to your comment in email about how I believe
impededance bumps don't exist, something which I never said or even
implied.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #70   Report Post  
Old August 18th 04, 02:09 PM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:00:49 -0400, "Leland C. Scott"
wrote in :


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
.. .
Regardless, I suggested that you -measure- this apparent loss, not
calculate it (.....gee, seems I've said that before.....).


I sent you a link to somebody who did using a RF network analyzer. He
reached the same conclusions I did. Give it a read.



I did. This is what I read: "....I must admit that the UHF type barrel
connector employed here was of fairly poor quality....". That's not
exactly a fair evaluation, now is it? That's like declaring SSB sucks
because the Pace Sidetalk you picked up at a yard sale doesn't sound
like your surround-sound home theater system.

You work as an R&D engineer at an electronics firm, right? So why not
just take five minutes from your lunch hour to test the damn things?
Wouldn't that be a whole lot easier than spending all that time
digging up subjective internet pages and typing up excuses for not
doing the test? I have done tests (on both UHF connectors -and-
mag-mounts) that you can easily repeat for yourself. So what's the
problem?





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. Ben Antenna 0 January 6th 04 01:18 AM
custom antenna mounts Ken Coe CB 0 November 12th 03 08:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017