Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote in message ... (I Am Not George) wrote: Forget it leland. no one in their right mind would go somewhere to meet an anonymous usenet poster who "says" he will be somewhere. For all you know it some kids playing jokes with there fathers computer ...and camera exactly. your just an anonymous stalker with a camera. too scared to let anoyone know your real name and address. what are you afraid of? if you are such a tough guy then them knowing who you are shouldnt make any difference to you. Never tell your adversary's where your bunker is..war 101 |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steveo wrote in message ...
(I Am Not George) wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I Am Not George) wrote in om: exactly. your just an anonymous stalker with a camera. too scared to let anoyone know your real name and address. what are you afraid of? if you are such a tough guy then them knowing who you are shouldnt make any difference to you. Bingo, you hit the nail right on the head. high five, lil bro ; ) I got five for nad boy..check yore mailbox. From: Subject: Woodward Oh Lee please meet me do meet me so I can beat you up If I dont beat someone up I'll just go crazy I drink too much and then I start wanting to hit someone. Meet me on Woodward I'll find you there hold up a sign with your name on it but first I want to hide behind some buildings and take pictures I may not come out only if therss no chance of you finding out who I am and where I live. Stand on the corner so I can throw my purse at you that way I never have to come out in the open I am so scared anyone will find out where I live but I do so need to beat people up. Please Lee please please please |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote in message ... (I Am Not George) wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I Am Not George) wrote in om: exactly. your just an anonymous stalker with a camera. too scared to let anoyone know your real name and address. what are you afraid of? if you are such a tough guy then them knowing who you are shouldnt make any difference to you. Bingo, you hit the nail right on the head. high five, lil bro ; ) I got five for nad boy..check yore mailbox. From: Subject: Woodward Oh Leland please meet me give blowjobs at the glory hole this time, you always hog the trouser snake. |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steveo" wrote in message ... (I Am Not George) wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I Am Not George) wrote in om: exactly. your just an anonymous stalker with a camera. too scared to let anoyone know your real name and address. what are you afraid of? if you are such a tough guy then them knowing who you are shouldnt make any difference to you. Bingo, you hit the nail right on the head. high five, lil bro ; ) I got five for nad boy..check yore mailbox. How pathetic, he still answers his own posts. Leave him alone a Mopar, he's going through withdrawals because people are ignoring him. Have a great Time at Woodward! Landshark -- Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen. |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote
in : Steveo wrote in news:20040817215206.834 : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I Am Not George) wrote in m: exactly. your just an anonymous stalker with a camera. too scared to let anoyone know your real name and address. what are you afraid of? if you are such a tough guy then them knowing who you are shouldnt make any difference to you. Bingo, you hit the nail right on the head. Eat **** you anonymous coward. who you talking to steveo? I am not anonymous LOL!! This Geo-logic reasoning thing is beyond words..!!! |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BP wrote:
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote in : Steveo wrote in news:20040817215206.834 : itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I Am Not George) wrote in m: exactly. your just an anonymous stalker with a camera. too scared to let anoyone know your real name and address. what are you afraid of? if you are such a tough guy then them knowing who you are shouldnt make any difference to you. Bingo, you hit the nail right on the head. Eat **** you anonymous coward. who you talking to steveo? I am not anonymous LOL!! This Geo-logic reasoning thing is beyond words..!!! Deer lowered! What a crock-o-****e! |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message ... (I Am Not George) wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: (I Am Not George) wrote in om: exactly. your just an anonymous stalker with a camera. too scared to let anoyone know your real name and address. what are you afraid of? if you are such a tough guy then them knowing who you are shouldnt make any difference to you. Bingo, you hit the nail right on the head. high five, lil bro ; ) I got five for nad boy..check yore mailbox. How pathetic, he still answers his own posts. Leave him alone a Mopar, he's going through withdrawals because people are ignoring him. Have a great Time at Woodward! Landshark He reminds me of a little punk in school that starts a fight and then hides and watches. Thanks, Shark. |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:11:14 -0400, "Leland C. Scott"
wrote in : "Frank Gilliland" wrote in message .. . Maybe you can explain that to Leland -- according to his calculations and internet research, they shouldn't work at all at those freqs. Why don't you show everybody where I said they don't work. Same goes for the link I sent you. That person did exactly what you proposed, used an expensive RF network analyzer, and reached conclusions just the opposite from yours. http://www.qsl.net/vk3jeg/pl259tst.html I'll let people read the paper for themselves. Nowhere does the aurthor say "they shouldn't work at all at those freqs", which is a flat out lie on your part. It was a response to your comment in email about how I believe impededance bumps don't exist, something which I never said or even implied. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#70
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:00:49 -0400, "Leland C. Scott"
wrote in : "Frank Gilliland" wrote in message .. . Regardless, I suggested that you -measure- this apparent loss, not calculate it (.....gee, seems I've said that before.....). I sent you a link to somebody who did using a RF network analyzer. He reached the same conclusions I did. Give it a read. I did. This is what I read: "....I must admit that the UHF type barrel connector employed here was of fairly poor quality....". That's not exactly a fair evaluation, now is it? That's like declaring SSB sucks because the Pace Sidetalk you picked up at a yard sale doesn't sound like your surround-sound home theater system. You work as an R&D engineer at an electronics firm, right? So why not just take five minutes from your lunch hour to test the damn things? Wouldn't that be a whole lot easier than spending all that time digging up subjective internet pages and typing up excuses for not doing the test? I have done tests (on both UHF connectors -and- mag-mounts) that you can easily repeat for yourself. So what's the problem? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
custom antenna mounts | CB |