Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 04, 04:20 AM
Steveo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Don" wrote:
That's right, get more channels, MORE power, and talk further, legally.
Get your HAM ticket be legal and get out from under the CB bull****.


Stand-by for the stampede of new radio operators that hope to talk
to a ****stick like you one of these days.

Go bounce your noise off a repeater.
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 04, 01:09 PM
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:49:48 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From:
(I*Am*Not*George)
Since 1976 we've been leeching off CBers with books, plans, and kits for
CB radio. Do-it-yourself repairs and modifications, amplifiers, FM
converters, bleedover filters, adding new frequencies, etc. are illegal
for CB according to the FCC but I, Lou Franklin, don't care! I will
teach you how to sleaze and weasel your way out of it with semantics
like "it's for 10-Meter Ham conversion" and "information is legal". Now
if I am teaching you how to be dishonest, how can you trust me, Lou
Franklin, to give you honest secrets of how to increase your power,
range, and privacy - even though its illegal? The answer is you cant ha
ha ha! Please visit our Web site, where you can download our unique
catalog of CB Radio Specialties and get encouragement to break FCC law,
or check out our most popular 'we dont care about legalities' schematics
(TriPower RF linear amp, Dynamic Speech Processor, FM3 circuit,
RogerBeep, etc.) and other CB technical articles at:
****************************************
www.cbcintl.com
SAVE MONEY sort of! We regularly spam the CB newsgroups in order to suck
cash from bullible CBers. I also run EBAY auctions in which you can save
up to HALF the cost of my 300 percent markup CB books and accessories.
To see what's currently on sale, double-click the line below:
http://stores.ebay.com/id=2993436&ssPageName=L2
-
You are in way over your head. You're lucky Lou is such a nice guy.
What you did clearly indicates an intentional and malicious act by
yourself to defame and malign his business and livelihood. In addition,
you violated the Digital Electronic Signature Act as defined and placed
into law by Congress because you attached his personal and proper name
to your fraudulent post in a manner to give the impression it was he who
wrote it concerning the business. If I were Lou, I would give you the
option to settle out of court..........one time. Then I would contact my
attorney and post his name on this group for additional contributions of
your behavior by others whose personal lives you have attempted to
malign. You could be in a heap of trouble boy, for sure.



It's a shame the poster was basically anonymous, so it would be very
difficult to ascertain just who actually posted it......


Dave
"Sandbagger"


  #3   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 04, 09:39 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:49:48 -0400,
(Twistedhed)
wrote:
From:
(I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
Since 1976 we've been leeching off CBers with books, plans, and kits for
CB radio. Do-it-yourself repairs and modifications, amplifiers, FM
converters, bleedover filters, adding new frequencies, etc. are illegal
for CB according to the FCC but I, Lou Franklin, don't care! I will
teach you how to sleaze and weasel your way out of it with semantics
like "it's for 10-Meter Ham conversion" and "information is legal". Now
if I am teaching you how to be dishonest, how can you trust me, Lou
Franklin, to give you honest secrets of how to increase your power,
range, and privacy - even though its illegal? The answer is you cant ha
ha ha! Please visit our Web site, where you can download our unique
catalog of CB Radio Specialties and get encouragement to break FCC law,
or check out our most popular 'we dont care about legalities' schematics
(TriPower RF linear amp, Dynamic Speech Processor, FM3 circuit,
RogerBeep, etc.) and other CB technical articles at:
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0www.c bcintl.com
SAVE MONEY sort of! We regularly spam the CB newsgroups in order to suck
cash from bullible CBers. I also run EBAY auctions in which you can save
up to HALF the cost of my 300 percent markup CB books and accessories.
To see what's currently on sale, double-click the line below:
http://stores.ebay.com/id=3D2993436&ssPageName=3DL2
-
=A0=A0You are in way over your head. You're lucky Lou is such a nice
guy. What you did clearly indicates an intentional and malicious act by
yourself to defame and malign his business and livelihood. In addition,
you violated the Digital Electronic Signature Act as defined and placed
into law by Congress because you attached his personal and proper name
to your fraudulent post in a manner to give the impression it was he who
wrote it concerning the business. If I were Lou, I would give you the
option to settle out of court..........one time. Then I would contact my
attorney and post his name on this group for additional contributions of
your behavior by others whose personal lives you have attempted to
malign. You could be in a heap of trouble boy, for sure.
_
It's a shame the poster was basically anonymous, so it would be very
difficult to ascertain just who actually posted it......
Dave
"Sandbagger"
_
Hello Dave, I thought you were going to reply to our last exhange of
posts prior to begining another, so I will refresh the pertinent
parameters of where we left off concerning your "spreading around
personal information" and "calling my bluff" on your trip to Mickey
Mouse.
The poster was by no means anonymous. To the uninitiated (concerning
knowledge of anonymity relating to the internet) he may appear
pseudo-anonymous on usenet, however, this specific person is not. Again,
you display you haven't bothered to read user agreements (I addressed
this once before with you) concerning one's anonymity and privacy.
Go read google user agreement. Many networks don't bother to demand a
subpoena and cooperate fully with law enforcement, especially when their
user is abusing their network. Again, please read the terms of service
regarding all aspects of your internet endeavors and please ask Phil
Kane (or someone qualified that you trust) for a correct information on
radio law and everything relating to the law of which you have been so
incorrect, or you can merrily continue to make the same repeat mistakes
that have become associated with your posts.

  #4   Report Post  
Old September 3rd 04, 03:37 AM
jim
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Twistedhed wrote:

From: (Dave Hall)
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:49:48 -0400,
(Twistedhed)
wrote:
From:
(I Am Not George)
Since 1976 we've been leeching off CBers with books, plans, and kits for
CB radio. Do-it-yourself repairs and modifications, amplifiers, FM
converters, bleedover filters, adding new frequencies, etc. are illegal
for CB according to the FCC but I, Lou Franklin, don't care! I will
teach you how to sleaze and weasel your way out of it with semantics
like "it's for 10-Meter Ham conversion" and "information is legal". Now
if I am teaching you how to be dishonest, how can you trust me, Lou
Franklin, to give you honest secrets of how to increase your power,
range, and privacy - even though its illegal? The answer is you cant ha
ha ha! Please visit our Web site, where you can download our unique
catalog of CB Radio Specialties and get encouragement to break FCC law,
or check out our most popular 'we dont care about legalities' schematics
(TriPower RF linear amp, Dynamic Speech Processor, FM3 circuit,
RogerBeep, etc.) and other CB technical articles at:
www.cbcintl.com
SAVE MONEY sort of! We regularly spam the CB newsgroups in order to suck
cash from bullible CBers. I also run EBAY auctions in which you can save
up to HALF the cost of my 300 percent markup CB books and accessories.
To see what's currently on sale, double-click the line below:
http://stores.ebay.com/id=2993436&ssPageName=L2
-
You are in way over your head. You're lucky Lou is such a nice
guy. What you did clearly indicates an intentional and malicious act by
yourself to defame and malign his business and livelihood. In addition,
you violated the Digital Electronic Signature Act as defined and placed
into law by Congress because you attached his personal and proper name
to your fraudulent post in a manner to give the impression it was he who
wrote it concerning the business. If I were Lou, I would give you the
option to settle out of court..........one time. Then I would contact my
attorney and post his name on this group for additional contributions of
your behavior by others whose personal lives you have attempted to
malign. You could be in a heap of trouble boy, for sure.
_
It's a shame the poster was basically anonymous, so it would be very
difficult to ascertain just who actually posted it......
Dave
"Sandbagger"
_
Hello Dave, I thought you were going to reply to our last exhange of
posts prior to begining another, so I will refresh the pertinent
parameters of where we left off concerning your "spreading around
personal information" and "calling my bluff" on your trip to Mickey
Mouse.
The poster was by no means anonymous. To the uninitiated (concerning
knowledge of anonymity relating to the internet) he may appear
pseudo-anonymous on usenet, however, this specific person is not. Again,
you display you haven't bothered to read user agreements (I addressed
this once before with you) concerning one's anonymity and privacy.
Go read google user agreement. Many networks don't bother to demand a
subpoena and cooperate fully with law enforcement, especially when their
user is abusing their network. Again, please read the terms of service
regarding all aspects of your internet endeavors and please ask Phil
Kane (or someone qualified that you trust) for a correct information on
radio law and everything relating to the law of which you have been so
incorrect, or you can merrily continue to make the same repeat mistakes
that have become associated with your posts.

nothing for nothing twist but you yak to much.
  #5   Report Post  
Old September 3rd 04, 04:11 AM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (jim)
Twistedhed wrote:
From:
(Dave Hall)
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:49:48 -0400,
(Twistedhed)
wrote:
From:
(I Am Not George)
Since 1976 we've been leeching off CBers with books, plans, and kits for
CB radio. Do-it-yourself repairs and modifications, amplifiers, FM
converters, bleedover filters, adding new frequencies, etc. are illegal
for CB according to the FCC but I, Lou Franklin, don't care! I will
teach you how to sleaze and weasel your way out of it with semantics
like "it's for 10-Meter Ham conversion" and "information is legal". Now
if I am teaching you how to be dishonest, how can you trust me, Lou
Franklin, to give you honest secrets of how to increase your power,
range, and privacy - even though its illegal? The answer is you cant ha
ha ha! Please visit our Web site, where you can download our unique
catalog of CB Radio Specialties and get encouragement to break FCC law,
or check out our most popular 'we dont care about legalities' schematics
(TriPower RF linear amp, Dynamic Speech Processor, FM3 circuit,
RogerBeep, etc.) and other CB technical articles at:
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0www.cbcintl.com
SAVE MONEY sort of! We regularly spam the CB newsgroups in order to suck
cash from bullible CBers. I also run EBAY auctions in which you can save
up to HALF the cost of my 300 percent markup CB books and accessories.
To see what's currently on sale, double-click the line below:
http://stores.ebay.com/id=3D2993436&ssPageName=3DL2
-
=A0=A0=A0=A0You are in way over your head. You're lucky Lou is such a
nice guy. What you did clearly indicates an intentional and malicious
act by yourself to defame and malign his business and livelihood. In
addition, you violated the Digital Electronic Signature Act as defined
and placed into law by Congress because you attached his personal and
proper name to your fraudulent post in a manner to give the impression
it was he who wrote it concerning the business. If I were Lou, I would
give you the option to settle out of court..........one time. Then I
would contact my attorney and post his name on this group for additional
contributions of your behavior by others whose personal lives you have
attempted to malign. You could be in a heap of trouble boy, for sure.
_
It's a shame the poster was basically anonymous, so it would be very
difficult to ascertain just who actually posted it...... Dave
"Sandbagger"
_
Hello Dave, I thought you were going to reply to our last exhange of
posts prior to begining another, so I will refresh the pertinent
parameters of where we left off concerning your "spreading around
personal information" and "calling my bluff" on your trip to Mickey
Mouse.
The poster was by no means anonymous. To the uninitiated (concerning
knowledge of anonymity relating to the internet) he may appear
pseudo-anonymous on usenet, however, this specific person is not. Again,
you display you haven't bothered to read user agreements (I addressed
this once before with you) concerning one's anonymity and privacy. Go
read google user agreement. Many networks don't bother to demand a
subpoena and cooperate fully with law enforcement, especially when their
user is abusing their network. Again, please read the terms of service
regarding all aspects of your internet endeavors and please ask Phil
Kane (or someone qualified that you trust) for a correct information on
radio law and everything relating to the law of which you have been so
incorrect, or you can merrily continue to make the same repeat mistakes
that have become associated with your posts.
_
nothing for nothing twist but you yak to much.
_
You heard me, too? Man, every frequency I go to these days I'm being
recognized. Amazing what height and water will do, ain't it? g



  #6   Report Post  
Old September 3rd 04, 01:05 PM
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:39:34 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From:
(Dave*Hall)
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:49:48 -0400,
(Twistedhed)
wrote:
From:
(I*Am*Not*George)
Since 1976 we've been leeching off CBers with books, plans, and kits for
CB radio. Do-it-yourself repairs and modifications, amplifiers, FM
converters, bleedover filters, adding new frequencies, etc. are illegal
for CB according to the FCC but I, Lou Franklin, don't care! I will
teach you how to sleaze and weasel your way out of it with semantics
like "it's for 10-Meter Ham conversion" and "information is legal". Now
if I am teaching you how to be dishonest, how can you trust me, Lou
Franklin, to give you honest secrets of how to increase your power,
range, and privacy - even though its illegal? The answer is you cant ha
ha ha! Please visit our Web site, where you can download our unique
catalog of CB Radio Specialties and get encouragement to break FCC law,
or check out our most popular 'we dont care about legalities' schematics
(TriPower RF linear amp, Dynamic Speech Processor, FM3 circuit,
RogerBeep, etc.) and other CB technical articles at:
****************************************
www.cbcintl.com
SAVE MONEY sort of! We regularly spam the CB newsgroups in order to suck
cash from bullible CBers. I also run EBAY auctions in which you can save
up to HALF the cost of my 300 percent markup CB books and accessories.
To see what's currently on sale, double-click the line below:
http://stores.ebay.com/id=2993436&ssPageName=L2
-
**You are in way over your head. You're lucky Lou is such a nice
guy. What you did clearly indicates an intentional and malicious act by
yourself to defame and malign his business and livelihood. In addition,
you violated the Digital Electronic Signature Act as defined and placed
into law by Congress because you attached his personal and proper name
to your fraudulent post in a manner to give the impression it was he who
wrote it concerning the business. If I were Lou, I would give you the
option to settle out of court..........one time. Then I would contact my
attorney and post his name on this group for additional contributions of
your behavior by others whose personal lives you have attempted to
malign. You could be in a heap of trouble boy, for sure.
_
It's a shame the poster was basically anonymous, so it would be very
difficult to ascertain just who actually posted it......
Dave
"Sandbagger"
_
Hello Dave, I thought you were going to reply to our last exhange of
posts prior to begining another, so I will refresh the pertinent
parameters of where we left off concerning your "spreading around
personal information" and "calling my bluff" on your trip to Mickey
Mouse.


Been busy. With the republican convention and such in the area, there
were more pressing issues than newsgroup stuff.


The poster was by no means anonymous. To the uninitiated (concerning
knowledge of anonymity relating to the internet) he may appear
pseudo-anonymous on usenet, however, this specific person is not.


And you know this how?

Again,
you display you haven't bothered to read user agreements (I addressed
this once before with you) concerning one's anonymity and privacy.


I don't care what "user agreements" may say. There are ways to get
onto the internet and onto free news servers which do not require
identifying oneself. My very first internet connection was through a
school account which a whole lot of people "shared". How does anyone
identify an anonymous person who uses such unregulated access points?


Go read google user agreement. Many networks don't bother to demand a
subpoena and cooperate fully with law enforcement, especially when their
user is abusing their network. Again, please read the terms of service
regarding all aspects of your internet endeavors and please ask Phil
Kane (or someone qualified that you trust) for a correct information on
radio law and everything relating to the law of which you have been so
incorrect, or you can merrily continue to make the same repeat mistakes
that have become associated with your posts.


That's all well and good IF these ISP's know who the person is. Again,
I know of many ways to gain access to the internet without having to
reveal your true identity. Cable modems can be hacked, many places
offer WiFi open network access, many libraries, schools and even the
local Starbucks and Burger Kings offer public internet access. How do
you trace an anonymous user who uses these public portals to access
the internet?

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

  #7   Report Post  
Old September 3rd 04, 04:48 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Dave=A0Hall)

It's a shame the poster was basically


anonymous, so it would be very difficult to


ascertain just who actually posted it...... Dave


"Sandbagger"

_
Hello Dave, I thought you were going to reply to our last exhange of
posts prior to begining another, so I will refresh the pertinent
parameters of where we left off concerning your "spreading around
personal information" and "calling my bluff" on your trip to Mickey
Mouse.


Been busy. With the republican convention


and such in the area, there were more


pressing issues than newsgroup stuff.





You're an hour or more west of Philly in Pa.., the convention is in NY.
Not many folks consider another state "in the area".
Nevertheless, you ignored the last questions posted to you and began new
postings.

_
The poster was by no means anonymous. To the uninitiated (concerning
knowledge of anonymity relating to the internet) he may appear
pseudo-anonymous on usenet, however, this specific person is not.

And you know this how?



Try and remain relevant and not concerned with my education and personal
life.

_
Again,
you display you haven't bothered to read user agreements (I addressed
this once before with you) concerning one's anonymity and privacy.

I don't care what "user agreements" may say.



And that is why you fail to understand them and how they operate and
need their operations explained,,because you admittedly don't care what
they say, you fail to read them, which is a reason for your ignorance of
their rules and the manner in whcih they operate..



There are ways to get onto the internet and


onto free news servers which do not require


identifying oneself.



Try and remain relevant and try to not present arguments to yourself. No
one said no identification isn't possible.


My very first internet connection was through


school account which a whole lot of people


"shared". How does anyone identify an


anonymous person who uses such


unregulated access points?





It's not up to me to educate you on such things, but if you really
haven't the foggiest clue how those hackers and virus creaters are
caught, I suppose I can take a few minutes and explain to you in email
how such things can occur. Of course, you can always do the homework
yourself......if you need reference points in where to begin, I can
assist with that dilemma of yours, also.


_
Go read google user agreement. Many networks don't bother to demand a
subpoena and cooperate fully with law enforcement, especially when their
user is abusing their network. Again, please read the terms of service
regarding all aspects of your internet endeavors and please ask Phil
Kane (or someone qualified that you trust) for a correct information on
radio law and everything relating to the law of which you have been so
incorrect, or you can merrily continue to make the same repeat mistakes
that have become associated with your posts.


That's all well and good IF these ISP's know


who the person is.



It's all well and good regardless. Many free isp's you speak of aren't
concerned with the identity of their users,,,UNLESS.


Again, I know of many ways to gain access to


the internet without having to reveal your true


identity.



Again, please remain relevant. You have demonstrated exactly what you
know and don't know, and the above statement has nothing to do with your
google user.



Cable modems can be hacked, many places


offer WiFi open network access,



Correct,,read my piece on WIFI. this is old news. Once again, stop
wandering and try and remain relevant and on subject. Google and AOL
isn't WIFI OR cable.

many


libraries, schools and even the local Starbucks
and Burger Kings offer public internet access.


How do you trace an anonymous user who


uses these public portals to access the


internet?



Once again, it;s not up to me to educate you on areas in which you lack
knowledge, but I wil assist you in broadening your intellect in this
area if you are that obsessed with truly hiding your identity when
posting to usenet.


Dave


N3CVJ


"Sandbagger"


http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C KA9S-3_Jeff Boatanchors 20 December 16th 04 08:51 AM
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C KA9S-3_Jeff Homebrew 9 December 13th 04 12:55 AM
URM 120 Uwe Homebrew 8 May 4th 04 12:42 AM
Kenwood TM-741 Auto power on when power applied. tirebouchon69 General 3 November 13th 03 03:31 PM
GET MORE CHANNELS, POWER, & RANGE! Lou Franklin CB 0 October 21st 03 03:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017