Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Don" wrote:
That's right, get more channels, MORE power, and talk further, legally. Get your HAM ticket be legal and get out from under the CB bull****. Stand-by for the stampede of new radio operators that hope to talk to a ****stick like you one of these days. Go bounce your noise off a repeater. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:49:48 -0400, (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George) Since 1976 we've been leeching off CBers with books, plans, and kits for CB radio. Do-it-yourself repairs and modifications, amplifiers, FM converters, bleedover filters, adding new frequencies, etc. are illegal for CB according to the FCC but I, Lou Franklin, don't care! I will teach you how to sleaze and weasel your way out of it with semantics like "it's for 10-Meter Ham conversion" and "information is legal". Now if I am teaching you how to be dishonest, how can you trust me, Lou Franklin, to give you honest secrets of how to increase your power, range, and privacy - even though its illegal? The answer is you cant ha ha ha! Please visit our Web site, where you can download our unique catalog of CB Radio Specialties and get encouragement to break FCC law, or check out our most popular 'we dont care about legalities' schematics (TriPower RF linear amp, Dynamic Speech Processor, FM3 circuit, RogerBeep, etc.) and other CB technical articles at: =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0www.c bcintl.com SAVE MONEY sort of! We regularly spam the CB newsgroups in order to suck cash from bullible CBers. I also run EBAY auctions in which you can save up to HALF the cost of my 300 percent markup CB books and accessories. To see what's currently on sale, double-click the line below: http://stores.ebay.com/id=3D2993436&ssPageName=3DL2 - =A0=A0You are in way over your head. You're lucky Lou is such a nice guy. What you did clearly indicates an intentional and malicious act by yourself to defame and malign his business and livelihood. In addition, you violated the Digital Electronic Signature Act as defined and placed into law by Congress because you attached his personal and proper name to your fraudulent post in a manner to give the impression it was he who wrote it concerning the business. If I were Lou, I would give you the option to settle out of court..........one time. Then I would contact my attorney and post his name on this group for additional contributions of your behavior by others whose personal lives you have attempted to malign. You could be in a heap of trouble boy, for sure. _ It's a shame the poster was basically anonymous, so it would be very difficult to ascertain just who actually posted it...... Dave "Sandbagger" _ Hello Dave, I thought you were going to reply to our last exhange of posts prior to begining another, so I will refresh the pertinent parameters of where we left off concerning your "spreading around personal information" and "calling my bluff" on your trip to Mickey Mouse. The poster was by no means anonymous. To the uninitiated (concerning knowledge of anonymity relating to the internet) he may appear pseudo-anonymous on usenet, however, this specific person is not. Again, you display you haven't bothered to read user agreements (I addressed this once before with you) concerning one's anonymity and privacy. Go read google user agreement. Many networks don't bother to demand a subpoena and cooperate fully with law enforcement, especially when their user is abusing their network. Again, please read the terms of service regarding all aspects of your internet endeavors and please ask Phil Kane (or someone qualified that you trust) for a correct information on radio law and everything relating to the law of which you have been so incorrect, or you can merrily continue to make the same repeat mistakes that have become associated with your posts. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Twistedhed wrote:
From: (Dave Hall) On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:49:48 -0400, (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (I Am Not George) Since 1976 we've been leeching off CBers with books, plans, and kits for CB radio. Do-it-yourself repairs and modifications, amplifiers, FM converters, bleedover filters, adding new frequencies, etc. are illegal for CB according to the FCC but I, Lou Franklin, don't care! I will teach you how to sleaze and weasel your way out of it with semantics like "it's for 10-Meter Ham conversion" and "information is legal". Now if I am teaching you how to be dishonest, how can you trust me, Lou Franklin, to give you honest secrets of how to increase your power, range, and privacy - even though its illegal? The answer is you cant ha ha ha! Please visit our Web site, where you can download our unique catalog of CB Radio Specialties and get encouragement to break FCC law, or check out our most popular 'we dont care about legalities' schematics (TriPower RF linear amp, Dynamic Speech Processor, FM3 circuit, RogerBeep, etc.) and other CB technical articles at: www.cbcintl.com SAVE MONEY sort of! We regularly spam the CB newsgroups in order to suck cash from bullible CBers. I also run EBAY auctions in which you can save up to HALF the cost of my 300 percent markup CB books and accessories. To see what's currently on sale, double-click the line below: http://stores.ebay.com/id=2993436&ssPageName=L2 - You are in way over your head. You're lucky Lou is such a nice guy. What you did clearly indicates an intentional and malicious act by yourself to defame and malign his business and livelihood. In addition, you violated the Digital Electronic Signature Act as defined and placed into law by Congress because you attached his personal and proper name to your fraudulent post in a manner to give the impression it was he who wrote it concerning the business. If I were Lou, I would give you the option to settle out of court..........one time. Then I would contact my attorney and post his name on this group for additional contributions of your behavior by others whose personal lives you have attempted to malign. You could be in a heap of trouble boy, for sure. _ It's a shame the poster was basically anonymous, so it would be very difficult to ascertain just who actually posted it...... Dave "Sandbagger" _ Hello Dave, I thought you were going to reply to our last exhange of posts prior to begining another, so I will refresh the pertinent parameters of where we left off concerning your "spreading around personal information" and "calling my bluff" on your trip to Mickey Mouse. The poster was by no means anonymous. To the uninitiated (concerning knowledge of anonymity relating to the internet) he may appear pseudo-anonymous on usenet, however, this specific person is not. Again, you display you haven't bothered to read user agreements (I addressed this once before with you) concerning one's anonymity and privacy. Go read google user agreement. Many networks don't bother to demand a subpoena and cooperate fully with law enforcement, especially when their user is abusing their network. Again, please read the terms of service regarding all aspects of your internet endeavors and please ask Phil Kane (or someone qualified that you trust) for a correct information on radio law and everything relating to the law of which you have been so incorrect, or you can merrily continue to make the same repeat mistakes that have become associated with your posts. nothing for nothing twist but you yak to much. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: (jim)
Twistedhed wrote: From: (Dave Hall) On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:49:48 -0400, (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (I Am Not George) Since 1976 we've been leeching off CBers with books, plans, and kits for CB radio. Do-it-yourself repairs and modifications, amplifiers, FM converters, bleedover filters, adding new frequencies, etc. are illegal for CB according to the FCC but I, Lou Franklin, don't care! I will teach you how to sleaze and weasel your way out of it with semantics like "it's for 10-Meter Ham conversion" and "information is legal". Now if I am teaching you how to be dishonest, how can you trust me, Lou Franklin, to give you honest secrets of how to increase your power, range, and privacy - even though its illegal? The answer is you cant ha ha ha! Please visit our Web site, where you can download our unique catalog of CB Radio Specialties and get encouragement to break FCC law, or check out our most popular 'we dont care about legalities' schematics (TriPower RF linear amp, Dynamic Speech Processor, FM3 circuit, RogerBeep, etc.) and other CB technical articles at: =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0www.cbcintl.com SAVE MONEY sort of! We regularly spam the CB newsgroups in order to suck cash from bullible CBers. I also run EBAY auctions in which you can save up to HALF the cost of my 300 percent markup CB books and accessories. To see what's currently on sale, double-click the line below: http://stores.ebay.com/id=3D2993436&ssPageName=3DL2 - =A0=A0=A0=A0You are in way over your head. You're lucky Lou is such a nice guy. What you did clearly indicates an intentional and malicious act by yourself to defame and malign his business and livelihood. In addition, you violated the Digital Electronic Signature Act as defined and placed into law by Congress because you attached his personal and proper name to your fraudulent post in a manner to give the impression it was he who wrote it concerning the business. If I were Lou, I would give you the option to settle out of court..........one time. Then I would contact my attorney and post his name on this group for additional contributions of your behavior by others whose personal lives you have attempted to malign. You could be in a heap of trouble boy, for sure. _ It's a shame the poster was basically anonymous, so it would be very difficult to ascertain just who actually posted it...... Dave "Sandbagger" _ Hello Dave, I thought you were going to reply to our last exhange of posts prior to begining another, so I will refresh the pertinent parameters of where we left off concerning your "spreading around personal information" and "calling my bluff" on your trip to Mickey Mouse. The poster was by no means anonymous. To the uninitiated (concerning knowledge of anonymity relating to the internet) he may appear pseudo-anonymous on usenet, however, this specific person is not. Again, you display you haven't bothered to read user agreements (I addressed this once before with you) concerning one's anonymity and privacy. Go read google user agreement. Many networks don't bother to demand a subpoena and cooperate fully with law enforcement, especially when their user is abusing their network. Again, please read the terms of service regarding all aspects of your internet endeavors and please ask Phil Kane (or someone qualified that you trust) for a correct information on radio law and everything relating to the law of which you have been so incorrect, or you can merrily continue to make the same repeat mistakes that have become associated with your posts. _ nothing for nothing twist but you yak to much. _ You heard me, too? Man, every frequency I go to these days I'm being recognized. Amazing what height and water will do, ain't it? g |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:39:34 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote: From: (Dave*Hall) On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:49:48 -0400, (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (I*Am*Not*George) Since 1976 we've been leeching off CBers with books, plans, and kits for CB radio. Do-it-yourself repairs and modifications, amplifiers, FM converters, bleedover filters, adding new frequencies, etc. are illegal for CB according to the FCC but I, Lou Franklin, don't care! I will teach you how to sleaze and weasel your way out of it with semantics like "it's for 10-Meter Ham conversion" and "information is legal". Now if I am teaching you how to be dishonest, how can you trust me, Lou Franklin, to give you honest secrets of how to increase your power, range, and privacy - even though its illegal? The answer is you cant ha ha ha! Please visit our Web site, where you can download our unique catalog of CB Radio Specialties and get encouragement to break FCC law, or check out our most popular 'we dont care about legalities' schematics (TriPower RF linear amp, Dynamic Speech Processor, FM3 circuit, RogerBeep, etc.) and other CB technical articles at: ****************************************www.cbcintl.com SAVE MONEY sort of! We regularly spam the CB newsgroups in order to suck cash from bullible CBers. I also run EBAY auctions in which you can save up to HALF the cost of my 300 percent markup CB books and accessories. To see what's currently on sale, double-click the line below: http://stores.ebay.com/id=2993436&ssPageName=L2 - **You are in way over your head. You're lucky Lou is such a nice guy. What you did clearly indicates an intentional and malicious act by yourself to defame and malign his business and livelihood. In addition, you violated the Digital Electronic Signature Act as defined and placed into law by Congress because you attached his personal and proper name to your fraudulent post in a manner to give the impression it was he who wrote it concerning the business. If I were Lou, I would give you the option to settle out of court..........one time. Then I would contact my attorney and post his name on this group for additional contributions of your behavior by others whose personal lives you have attempted to malign. You could be in a heap of trouble boy, for sure. _ It's a shame the poster was basically anonymous, so it would be very difficult to ascertain just who actually posted it...... Dave "Sandbagger" _ Hello Dave, I thought you were going to reply to our last exhange of posts prior to begining another, so I will refresh the pertinent parameters of where we left off concerning your "spreading around personal information" and "calling my bluff" on your trip to Mickey Mouse. Been busy. With the republican convention and such in the area, there were more pressing issues than newsgroup stuff. The poster was by no means anonymous. To the uninitiated (concerning knowledge of anonymity relating to the internet) he may appear pseudo-anonymous on usenet, however, this specific person is not. And you know this how? Again, you display you haven't bothered to read user agreements (I addressed this once before with you) concerning one's anonymity and privacy. I don't care what "user agreements" may say. There are ways to get onto the internet and onto free news servers which do not require identifying oneself. My very first internet connection was through a school account which a whole lot of people "shared". How does anyone identify an anonymous person who uses such unregulated access points? Go read google user agreement. Many networks don't bother to demand a subpoena and cooperate fully with law enforcement, especially when their user is abusing their network. Again, please read the terms of service regarding all aspects of your internet endeavors and please ask Phil Kane (or someone qualified that you trust) for a correct information on radio law and everything relating to the law of which you have been so incorrect, or you can merrily continue to make the same repeat mistakes that have become associated with your posts. That's all well and good IF these ISP's know who the person is. Again, I know of many ways to gain access to the internet without having to reveal your true identity. Cable modems can be hacked, many places offer WiFi open network access, many libraries, schools and even the local Starbucks and Burger Kings offer public internet access. How do you trace an anonymous user who uses these public portals to access the internet? Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
It's a shame the poster was basically anonymous, so it would be very difficult to ascertain just who actually posted it...... Dave "Sandbagger" _ Hello Dave, I thought you were going to reply to our last exhange of posts prior to begining another, so I will refresh the pertinent parameters of where we left off concerning your "spreading around personal information" and "calling my bluff" on your trip to Mickey Mouse. Been busy. With the republican convention and such in the area, there were more pressing issues than newsgroup stuff. You're an hour or more west of Philly in Pa.., the convention is in NY. Not many folks consider another state "in the area". Nevertheless, you ignored the last questions posted to you and began new postings. _ The poster was by no means anonymous. To the uninitiated (concerning knowledge of anonymity relating to the internet) he may appear pseudo-anonymous on usenet, however, this specific person is not. And you know this how? Try and remain relevant and not concerned with my education and personal life. _ Again, you display you haven't bothered to read user agreements (I addressed this once before with you) concerning one's anonymity and privacy. I don't care what "user agreements" may say. And that is why you fail to understand them and how they operate and need their operations explained,,because you admittedly don't care what they say, you fail to read them, which is a reason for your ignorance of their rules and the manner in whcih they operate.. There are ways to get onto the internet and onto free news servers which do not require identifying oneself. Try and remain relevant and try to not present arguments to yourself. No one said no identification isn't possible. My very first internet connection was through school account which a whole lot of people "shared". How does anyone identify an anonymous person who uses such unregulated access points? It's not up to me to educate you on such things, but if you really haven't the foggiest clue how those hackers and virus creaters are caught, I suppose I can take a few minutes and explain to you in email how such things can occur. Of course, you can always do the homework yourself......if you need reference points in where to begin, I can assist with that dilemma of yours, also. _ Go read google user agreement. Many networks don't bother to demand a subpoena and cooperate fully with law enforcement, especially when their user is abusing their network. Again, please read the terms of service regarding all aspects of your internet endeavors and please ask Phil Kane (or someone qualified that you trust) for a correct information on radio law and everything relating to the law of which you have been so incorrect, or you can merrily continue to make the same repeat mistakes that have become associated with your posts. That's all well and good IF these ISP's know who the person is. It's all well and good regardless. Many free isp's you speak of aren't concerned with the identity of their users,,,UNLESS. Again, I know of many ways to gain access to the internet without having to reveal your true identity. Again, please remain relevant. You have demonstrated exactly what you know and don't know, and the above statement has nothing to do with your google user. Cable modems can be hacked, many places offer WiFi open network access, Correct,,read my piece on WIFI. this is old news. Once again, stop wandering and try and remain relevant and on subject. Google and AOL isn't WIFI OR cable. many libraries, schools and even the local Starbucks and Burger Kings offer public internet access. How do you trace an anonymous user who uses these public portals to access the internet? Once again, it;s not up to me to educate you on areas in which you lack knowledge, but I wil assist you in broadening your intellect in this area if you are that obsessed with truly hiding your identity when posting to usenet. Dave N3CVJ "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Boatanchors | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Homebrew | |||
URM 120 | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood TM-741 Auto power on when power applied. | General | |||
GET MORE CHANNELS, POWER, & RANGE! | CB |