I ain't George either wrote:
Read again you idiot, it's a warning, not a citation........putz.

how does the fact that its a warning make selling amps on the internet
legal, as twisty says it is? Go back to the crack pipe randy LOL

FCC rules apply only to the US. The internet is international
and he is
quite within his rights to offer such an item for sale. Export to
another country is quite legal. Get educated.

"I Am Not George" wrote in message
m...
I ain't George either wrote:
Read again you idiot, it's a warning, not a citation........putz.

how does the fact that its a warning make selling amps on the internet
legal, as twisty says it is? Go back to the crack pipe randy LOL

I got a crack, and a pipe you can smoke, putz-boi. Now go back to your
corner, moron.

WA3MOJ wrote:
Twisty it is rare that anyone calls you on your

bull****,


Only because I rarely post "bull****".


that must be why you keep making

outrageous **** up. Below is a recent FCC

citation for selling and offering for sale cb type

amps on the internet.



Read it again. He went back on word via his SIGNED affidavit to not sell
the items in question. Again, there are exceptions to this rule. All one
needs is to be a valid exporter. Mr. Hewitt, apparently was not. Case
closed. It's why so many places exist that sell such items and the FCC
does nothing.,,because an exporter may sell these items legally.



-
March 23, 2004
Mr. Donal W. Hewitt
P. O. Box 344
Tomball, TX 77377
SUBJECT: WARNING NOTICE--POWER AMPLIFIER
MARKETING VIOLATIONS
Case # EB-2000-222
Dear Mr. Hewitt:
At the Dayton Hamvention in 1999, an official Notice of Violation was
issued to you as a result of violation of Section 2.815 of the
Commission's rules regarding manufacturing and marketing external radio
frequency power amplifiers that operate below 144 MHz. The citation was
based upon the offering for sale of your model WM-600 and WM-300
amplifiers and kits.
In your response to the citation on May 24, 1999, you stated "I have
ceased from selling and offering for sale the Model WM-300 and WM-600
linear amplifiers and any other of this type amplifiers." We note that
on your Web site www.worth-more.com, you are again advertising these
amplifiers. Although you state on the Web site that these units are for
sale "pending certification," we note numerous reports from purchasers
of these units on www.eHam.net. We also note that on January 17, 2004,
you presented and offered for sale non-certified amplifiers at the
Houston Amateur Radio Supply parking lot as well as at the February 21,
2004, Smithville, Texas Hamfest.
This letter constitutes a Warning that continued sale of non-certified
equipment will subject you to fine or imprisonment, as well as an in rem
seizure of non-certified equipment, in cooperation with the United
States Attorney for your jurisdiction. Monetary forfeitures normally
range from $7,500 to $10,000. Such continued sale will also result in
the designation of your Amateur Radio station license for a revocation
proceeding, and your Operator license for a suspension proceeding. This
is the last written warning you will receive about this matter. CCL:
Southeastern Regional Director, FCC

Twistedhed ) wrote:
WA3MOJ wrote:
Twisty it is rare that anyone calls you on your

bull****,


Only because I rarely post "bull****".


that must be why you keep making

outrageous **** up. Below is a recent FCC

citation for selling and offering for sale cb type

amps on the internet.



Read it again. He went back on word via his SIGNED affidavit to not
sell
the items in question. Again, there are exceptions to this rule. All
one
needs is to be a valid exporter. Mr. Hewitt, apparently was not. Case
closed. It's why so many places exist that sell such items and the
FCC
does nothing.,,because an exporter may sell these items legally.

when you tell a whopper you really tell a whopper lol. OK Twist please
post the exceptions. That would be the part of the FCC rules that say
CB amps are OK for export and all you need to be is a valid exporter.
Since you know they are fact you should bre able to post them. Oh here
it comes I can tell already you are twisting and spinning and
backpedaling wait for it here comes your most creative excuse yet
ROTFLMAO

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
Twistedhed ) wrote:
WA3MOJ wrote:
Twisty it is rare that anyone calls you on your

bull****,


Only because I rarely post "bull****".


that must be why you keep making

outrageous **** up. Below is a recent FCC

citation for selling and offering for sale cb type

amps on the internet.


Read it again. He went back on word via his SIGNED affidavit to not sell
the items in question. Again, there are exceptions to this rule. All one
needs is to be a valid exporter. Mr. Hewitt, apparently was not. Case
closed. It's why so many places exist that sell such items and the FCC
does nothing.,,because an exporter may sell these items legally.


when you tell a whopper you really tell a

whopper lol.



When you are on a roll of misinterpretations, you go all out...like now.



OK Twist please post the exceptions.


There are plenty of exceptions. Do a search on amplifiers and you can
entertain and anger yourself for hours concerning all these "exceptions"
( of which you are unable to digest) who sell them.


That

would be the part of the FCC rules that say

CB amps are OK for export and all you need

to be is a valid exporter.




The rules you speak of do not contain any such list of permissables, but
only of what is prohibited.




Since you know they are fact you should bre

able to post them.



I know certain automobiles and motorcycles are legal on the highways,
but you will not find them on a list of permissables among the ules
governing what is allowed on highways, only of what isn't. Seeking
absolute negatives renders you confused, for much of your
misinterpretations come from such thinking.


Oh here it comes I can tell already you are

twisting and spinning and backpedaling wait

for it here comes your most creative excuse

yet ROTFLMAO



Email the FCC and ask them. This way, your misinterpretation of the
rules and disagreement is with the FCC, not I. Bottom line, since I know
what I claimed is fact, I don't have the slightest concern what you may
or may not believe. You have every right to remain in the dark on such
issues and believe what you may.

(Twistedhed) wrote:
iamnotgeorge wrote:
Oh here it comes I can tell already you are
twisting and spinning and backpedaling wait
for it here comes your most creative excuse
yet ROTFLMAO



Email the FCC and ask them. This way, your misinterpretation of the
rules and disagreement is with the FCC, not I. Bottom line, since I
know
what I claimed is fact, I don't have the slightest concern what you
may
or may not believe. You have every right to remain in the dark on
such
issues and believe what you may.

ROTFLAMO!!!! just as predicted. You can't back up what you wrote, and
now you want ME to do the legwork to prove it FOR you!
LOLLLLLLLLLLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOL your our prize sneaky old lyin snake
twisty ha ha hahhaha