| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#32
October 23rd 04, 02:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"harvey" wrote in message
... ok after a few monhts of reading here and some digging, my assumptions are thus: keyclowns: snip The theory is that Keyclowns are illegal CBers, and Antikeyclowns those who oppose illegal CB. However, that is all just a cover for the truth. Some people are just hell bent against CB and those who use it - as demonstrated by their inability to post CB related messages, and their use of the term "keyclown" being aimed at anyone they dislike - without any proof of any kind that they use any illegal CB of any kind. The homosexual hate messages are just the physical manifestation of the mental problems within the minds of those who hate some people so much that they will chase them around trying to anoy them. Rather than trying to make their own lives better and more enjoyable, they wish to make other people as unhappy and mentally unwell as themselves. Although they try to mask what they are with some claim to respect for the law, they are often unmasked as their own criminal activities or "brushes" with the FCC or police are made public. That being said, there are some on this group who are pro-legal, some who are against laws restricting freedom of communications, and others who walk the line between - believing that the law is often an ass, and may not always be technically correct. For example, distance rules. In America, you have a "No DX" rule. If you do not reply to a signal, does that mean it did not go over that distance? This law is often seen as a technically unsound and legally unenforceable law. Here in the UK, when CB was first legalised, our Government opted to restrict distance with tech spec rather than trust to some "no DX" rule. What they did was to put in rules regarding antenna length and height from the ground. Those who stuck within the law were radiating 4 Watts of RF at a height well below that of radio and TV equipment, and often caused interference. It was soon worked out that, to avoid harmful interference and grief, the way to go was NOT what the law said. The rule was broken everywhere, and never enforced. Eventually, the government saw their error, removed the height rule and relaxed the length rule, allowing us bigger homebase antennas at any height within local planning rules. Some say that stupid laws often needs a hard push before they will be changed, and illegal action becomes necessary - would the RA have removed that height rule if CBers had not proved it wrong by their illegal use? Would the UK Government even be considering changing outdated and extremely sexist family law if it was not for the illegal actions of Batman and Robin? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydispl...bsection=world http://www.itv.com/news/index_1789720.html http://www.fathers-4-justice.org I wouldn't have liked to be the person who had to make the call to the queen... "Sorry to bother you, your majesty... but Batman is on your ledge, and he's asking to speak to you." Aparently she watched it on TV. Regards, Peter. http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/ |
|
#33
October 25th 04, 08:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter" wrote
"harvey" wrote in message ... ok after a few monhts of reading here and some digging, my assumptions are thus: keyclowns: snip The theory is that Keyclowns are illegal CBers, and Antikeyclowns those who oppose illegal CB. However, that is all just a cover for the truth. Some people are just hell bent against CB and those who use it - as demonstrated by their inability to post CB related messages, and their use of the term "keyclown" being aimed at anyone they dislike - without any proof of any kind that they use any illegal CB of any kind. The homosexual hate messages are just the physical manifestation of the mental problems within the minds of those who hate some people so much that they will chase them around trying to anoy them. Keyclown hypocrisy at it's finest. Ask Peter Analbuster about his rec.radio.cb "humour" page. He and homosexual stalker mopeydopey are birds of a feather. When they don't get their way, they start crying about what a shame it is the NG is cluttered up with their own smelly turds. The fact remains, keyclowns DO operate illegally and get called on it by the anti boys. Illegal CB amp auctions DO get busted because they ARE against the law and against ebay policy. Keyclowns DO act effeminately and WILL be called gay, and rightly so. AKC still runs the NG, Keyclowns are still off topic, mopeydopey is still a whining sissy. The more things change the more they stay the same. You can never stop the AKC and you can never stop N8. You posted his personal info...HE LAUGHED! You made obscene web pages about him...HE LAUGHED! You whined to ISP's about him...HE LAUGHED! You threatened violence against him...HE LAUGHED! You call him names...HE LAUGHED! You call him everything in the book...HE LAUGHED! You keep trying......HE KEEPS LAUGHING! You keep failing.........HE KEEPS LAUGHING! You are outta your league with N8wwm.......HE KEEPS LAUGHING! He has sworn to never stop because of what you guys have done, he is laughing at you keyclowns.......HE KEEPS LAUGHING! He won't ever stop, you won't ever win......HE KEEPS LAUGHING! |
|
#34
October 25th 04, 09:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:49:09 +0100, "Peter"
wrote in : "harvey" wrote in message ... ok after a few monhts of reading here and some digging, my assumptions are thus: keyclowns: snip The theory is that Keyclowns are illegal CBers, and Antikeyclowns those who oppose illegal CB. However, that is all just a cover for the truth. Some people are just hell bent against CB and those who use it - as demonstrated by their inability to post CB related messages, and their use of the term "keyclown" being aimed at anyone they dislike - without any proof of any kind that they use any illegal CB of any kind. Don't they allow an admission of guilt as evidence in the UK? The homosexual hate messages are just the physical manifestation of the mental problems within the minds of those who hate some people so much that they will chase them around trying to anoy them. Rather than trying to make their own lives better and more enjoyable, they wish to make other people as unhappy and mentally unwell as themselves. True story. Although they try to mask what they are with some claim to respect for the law, they are often unmasked as their own criminal activities or "brushes" with the FCC or police are made public. Are you speaking of "they" or just Doug? That being said, there are some on this group who are pro-legal, some who are against laws restricting freedom of communications, Whoa there, Peter! Who in this group -- Doug included -- has ever -supported- any law that restricts the freedom of communication? Or the right to freedom of speech? Nobody, as far as I can remember. If you are suggesting that the laws governing radio communications are a violation of the right to free speech then you are WAY wrong because that has already been thrown out in both the courts -and- in this newsgroup. Get this straight, Peter: You have freedoms, but those freedoms are limited to the extent that you don't violate the rights of others. You have freedom of movement -provided- you don't tresspass on someone else's property. You have the freedom of speech -provided- you don't cause a public nuisance. You can drive a car -provided- you stay in your own lane. Etc, etc. Your freedoms, including the freedom to communicate, are not restricted except to the extent needed to provide those same freedoms to everyone and not violate the rights of others. If there -is- such a law, US or UK, I invite you to post it. and others who walk the line between - believing that the law is often an ass, and may not always be technically correct. And that's very true -- some laws are, for the lack of a better term, stupid. But there are ways to change laws. Legal ways. Ways that neither require nor justify violating any 'stupid' law. For example, distance rules. In America, you have a "No DX" rule. If you do not reply to a signal, does that mean it did not go over that distance? This law is often seen as a technically unsound and legally unenforceable law. The FCC has made it quite clear that the law applies only to the -deliberate attempt- to exceed the distance limitations. I'll agree that the laws governing the intended scope of CB radio are rarely enforced. But that does not justify the violation of those laws. Amateur radio is the proper service for the DX hobby, and is available to anyone who can afford a happy meal and can memorize a few test questions. Here in the UK, when CB was first legalised, our Government opted to restrict distance with tech spec rather than trust to some "no DX" rule. What they did was to put in rules regarding antenna length and height from the ground. Those who stuck within the law were radiating 4 Watts of RF at a height well below that of radio and TV equipment, and often caused interference. It was soon worked out that, to avoid harmful interference and grief, the way to go was NOT what the law said. The rule was broken everywhere, and never enforced. Eventually, the government saw their error, removed the height rule and relaxed the length rule, allowing us bigger homebase antennas at any height within local planning rules. Was the law changed because of the de-facto standard? or because the authority was presented with valid technical arguments that supported the change? Was there an official explanation for the decision? If so, got a link? Some say that stupid laws often needs a hard push before they will be changed, and illegal action becomes necessary - would the RA have removed that height rule if CBers had not proved it wrong by their illegal use? Hey Ghandi, see above. Would the UK Government even be considering changing outdated and extremely sexist family law if it was not for the illegal actions of Batman and Robin? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydispl...bsection=world http://www.itv.com/news/index_1789720.html http://www.fathers-4-justice.org I wouldn't have liked to be the person who had to make the call to the queen... "Sorry to bother you, your majesty... but Batman is on your ledge, and he's asking to speak to you." Aparently she watched it on TV. Most politicians, like Michael Jackson, live inside a box and aren't quite in touch with reality. Sometimes it takes an extreme act to draw attention to an issue that is otherwise ignored. But the definition of 'extreme' doesn't include the word 'illegal'. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
|
#35
October 25th 04, 10:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter" wrote in message
... Post snipped for brevity... against laws restricting freedom of communications "freedom of communications" only pertains to verbal communications not radio or TV ect. I can only surmise you believe you have rights in this issue the same as others believe they have the right to drive a car. You do not. Radio communications and driving a car are privileges granted by higher authorities and are subject to termination should that privilege be abused. |
|
#36
October 26th 04, 12:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cry_Keyclowns_Cry" wrote in message lkaboutradio.com... "Peter" wrote "harvey" wrote in message ... ok after a few monhts of reading here and some digging, my assumptions are thus: keyclowns: snip The theory is that Keyclowns are illegal CBers, and Antikeyclowns those who oppose illegal CB. However, that is all just a cover for the truth. Some people are just hell bent against CB and those who use it - as demonstrated by their inability to post CB related messages, and their use of the term "keyclown" being aimed at anyone they dislike - without any proof of any kind that they use any illegal CB of any kind. The homosexual hate messages are just the physical manifestation of the mental problems within the minds of those who hate some people so much that they will chase them around trying to anoy them. Keyclown hypocrisy at it's finest. Ask Peter Analbuster about his rec.radio.cb "humour" page. He and homosexual stalker mopeydopey are birds of a feather. When they don't get their way, they start crying about what a shame it is the NG is cluttered up with their own smelly turds. The fact remains, keyclowns DO operate illegally and get called on it by the anti boys. Illegal CB amp auctions DO get busted because they ARE against the law and against ebay policy. Keyclowns DO act effeminately and WILL be called gay, and rightly so. AKC still runs the NG, Keyclowns are still off topic, mopeydopey is still a whining sissy. The more things change the more they stay the same. You can never stop the AKC and you can never stop N8. You posted his personal info...HE LAUGHED! You made obscene web pages about him...HE LAUGHED! You whined to ISP's about him...HE LAUGHED! You threatened violence against him...HE LAUGHED! You call him names...HE LAUGHED! You call him everything in the book...HE LAUGHED! You keep trying......HE KEEPS LAUGHING! You keep failing.........HE KEEPS LAUGHING! You are outta your league with N8wwm.......HE KEEPS LAUGHING! He has sworn to never stop because of what you guys have done, he is laughing at you keyclowns.......HE KEEPS LAUGHING! He won't ever stop, you won't ever win......HE KEEPS LAUGHING! And he speaks in the 3rd person about himself. Delusional? You be the judge. |
|
#37
October 26th 04, 01:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter" wrote in message ...
"harvey" wrote in message ... ok after a few monhts of reading here and some digging, my assumptions are thus: keyclowns: snip The theory is that Keyclowns are illegal CBers, and Antikeyclowns those who oppose illegal CB. However, that is all just a cover for the truth. Some people are just hell bent against CB and those who use it - as demonstrated by their inability to post CB related messages, and their use of the term "keyclown" being aimed at anyone they dislike - without any proof of any kind that they use any illegal CB of any kind. The homosexual hate messages are just the physical manifestation of the mental problems within the minds of those who hate some people so much that they will chase them around trying to anoy them. Rather than trying to make their own lives better and more enjoyable, they wish to make other people as unhappy and mentally unwell as themselves. Although they try to mask what they are with some claim to respect for the law, they are often unmasked as their own criminal activities or "brushes" with the FCC or police are made public. That being said, there are some on this group who are pro-legal, some who are against laws restricting freedom of communications, and others who walk the line between - believing that the law is often an ass, and may not always be technically correct. For example, distance rules. In America, you have a "No DX" rule. If you do not reply to a signal, does that mean it did not go over that distance? This law is often seen as a technically unsound and legally unenforceable law. Here in the UK, when CB was first legalised, our Government opted to restrict distance with tech spec rather than trust to some "no DX" rule. What they did was to put in rules regarding antenna length and height from the ground. Those who stuck within the law were radiating 4 Watts of RF at a height well below that of radio and TV equipment, and often caused interference. It was soon worked out that, to avoid harmful interference and grief, the way to go was NOT what the law said. The rule was broken everywhere, and never enforced. Eventually, the government saw their error, removed the height rule and relaxed the length rule, allowing us bigger homebase antennas at any height within local planning rules. Some say that stupid laws often needs a hard push before they will be changed, and illegal action becomes necessary - would the RA have removed that height rule if CBers had not proved it wrong by their illegal use? Would the UK Government even be considering changing outdated and extremely sexist family law if it was not for the illegal actions of Batman and Robin? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydispl...bsection=world http://www.itv.com/news/index_1789720.html http://www.fathers-4-justice.org I wouldn't have liked to be the person who had to make the call to the queen... "Sorry to bother you, your majesty... but Batman is on your ledge, and he's asking to speak to you." Aparently she watched it on TV. Regards, Peter. http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/ Hey brummy anyone can see steveo and his sock pals contribute there fair share of **** in this NG. You forget they are too dumb to know doug has got them by the balls he is playing them sometimes using the same posts over again to jerk them around. |
|
#38
October 26th 04, 01:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(I Am Not George) wrote in
m: "Peter" wrote in message ... "harvey" wrote in message ... ok after a few monhts of reading here and some digging, my assumptions are thus: keyclowns: snip The theory is that Keyclowns are illegal CBers, and Antikeyclowns those who oppose illegal CB. However, that is all just a cover for the truth. Some people are just hell bent against CB and those who use it - as demonstrated by their inability to post CB related messages, and their use of the term "keyclown" being aimed at anyone they dislike - without any proof of any kind that they use any illegal CB of any kind. The homosexual hate messages are just the physical manifestation of the mental problems within the minds of those who hate some people so much that they will chase them around trying to anoy them. Rather than trying to make their own lives better and more enjoyable, they wish to make other people as unhappy and mentally unwell as themselves. Although they try to mask what they are with some claim to respect for the law, they are often unmasked as their own criminal activities or "brushes" with the FCC or police are made public. That being said, there are some on this group who are pro-legal, some who are against laws restricting freedom of communications, and others who walk the line between - believing that the law is often an ass, and may not always be technically correct. For example, distance rules. In America, you have a "No DX" rule. If you do not reply to a signal, does that mean it did not go over that distance? This law is often seen as a technically unsound and legally unenforceable law. Here in the UK, when CB was first legalised, our Government opted to restrict distance with tech spec rather than trust to some "no DX" rule. What they did was to put in rules regarding antenna length and height from the ground. Those who stuck within the law were radiating 4 Watts of RF at a height well below that of radio and TV equipment, and often caused interference. It was soon worked out that, to avoid harmful interference and grief, the way to go was NOT what the law said. The rule was broken everywhere, and never enforced. Eventually, the government saw their error, removed the height rule and relaxed the length rule, allowing us bigger homebase antennas at any height within local planning rules. Some say that stupid laws often needs a hard push before they will be changed, and illegal action becomes necessary - would the RA have removed that height rule if CBers had not proved it wrong by their illegal use? Would the UK Government even be considering changing outdated and extremely sexist family law if it was not for the illegal actions of Batman and Robin? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydispl...1355&thesectio n=news&thesubsection=world http://www.itv.com/news/index_1789720.html http://www.fathers-4-justice.org I wouldn't have liked to be the person who had to make the call to the queen... "Sorry to bother you, your majesty... but Batman is on your ledge, and he's asking to speak to you." Aparently she watched it on TV. Regards, Peter. http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/ Hey brummy anyone can see steveo and his sock pals contribute there fair share of **** in this NG. You forget they are too dumb to know doug has got them by the balls he is playing them sometimes using the same posts over again to jerk them around. Been trolling in the [uk.rec.radio.cb] lately, humpy-puppet? http://tinyurl.com/5of42 |
|
#39
October 26th 04, 02:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
BP wrote:
Been trolling in the [uk.rec.radio.cb] lately, humpy-puppet? http://tinyurl.com/5of42 What a pathetic loser. |
|
#40
October 26th 04, 03:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steveo wrote in message ...
BP wrote: Been trolling in the [uk.rec.radio.cb] lately, humpy-puppet? http://tinyurl.com/5of42 What a pathetic loser. What a rimming sissy you are, ta boot! |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Noise and Loops Question | Antenna | |||
| Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
| Optimod question. | Broadcasting | |||
| Yagi / Beam antenna theory question... | Antenna | |||
| BPL Video On-Line | Policy | |||
Linear Mode
