On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:32:19 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:48:36 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
Someday I may clue you in to just how a
psychological study of your posting habits was
included in someone I know's psychology
report on deviant behaviors.

That would be so rich, if you knew who the hell you were responding,

That'll never happen, since you have such a
paranoia about remaining anonymous.

Just can't help yourself,,,lmao.
Only you are concerned with the personal identity

Your identity is who you are. You said it yourself: "If I only knew
who the hell I was responding too"..... The implication, of course, is
that I would somehow recognize you as someone I either know, or is
someone of some prestige or notoriety, which commands some degree of
respect. But as long as you choose to hide behind your "cartoon
character", we'll never know that, and you remain an anonymous little
twit, who lacks the guts to come clean.


BTW, I'm not the one desperately trying to find out little tidbits of
information about other people on here, like your erroneous claim that
my wife's name was "Kim T. Hall", or who once claimed that you had it
on good authority that I'm a bitter divorced man, or that I was
"abused" by my grandfather at a young age.

For someone who claims to care little about personal information, you
sure make efforts to find it, even if it is wrong. Just another
example of your hypocrisy, and lies.


of cbers with such a
fervor. Concerning your self-espoused accomplishments concerning the
internet, you sure have a cow over following internet safety protocol,
security experts advice, and basic isp groundrules for the internet.
Very telling is your dwelling on that of which you are not permitted.
You're like a spoiled child that keeps being told "no" over and over and
all he can do is cry about how unfair life is and blame others for his
misery.

As opposed to you who, when told "no", just do it anyway in disregard
for the laws of society?


And such is the double edged sword of
remaining anonymous. If you really are
someone of worthiness, and respect, well
never know it,


The people you consider "we" in addition to yourself, are in no position
to judge, despite your self-elevational status to judge, jury, and
executioner.

Borrowing terms from Frank now? You really are devoid of originality
aren't you?


Such delusions are what has you so angry over being kept so
impotent regarding that of which you are continually denied.

If that were true, it would be laughable. The day that I let this
newsgroup rule my life, will be the day I leave. Like the radio, I
control what goes on. I make you speak. When I'm done, I stop, until I
feel the need to slap your sociopathic self around again. But you are
blinded by your own elevated sense of self worth to see that, or be
able to make such a judgement as to who is really "impotent".

You still don't get it. The only time someone is "impotent" is when
they are ignored. You can't control yourself enough to allow that. By
constantly responding to me, you have guaranteed that I am anything
but "impotent".

and you remain a newsgroup punch-clown,

Davie's feelings are hurt again,

You assume that I have feelings to hurt.

who spreads lies about other people only to
provoke or continue controversy.
You are the "Anti" Doug.

Yes, and you align yourself with him and have defended him on many
occasion.

Doug is more rational than you are. All that comes from your fingers
is double talk and obfuscation. At least Doug is consistent, even if
warped.


It's all part of the fun for me.

It has been illustrated many times you find "fun" through your lying.

I have not lied about anything. Your statements to the contrary is
not proof, but rather your desperation.

On the other hand, you are the one who lies. My fun is exposing you
for what you are. By attempting to place other people on the
defensive, it keeps the spotlight off of your own transgressions, such
as your blatant disregard for federal law, which you claim, on one
hand, to respect, yet selectively ignore when it suits you. Another
glaring example of your hypocrisy.


For the record, I never said that I am a
licensed practitioner.

It hasn't pervented you from thinking of yourself as holding the same
qualification as such.

How could you possibly know what I think of myself? Once again your
narcissistic sense of elevated self worth has propelled you to the
role of seer.


..lol.....but of course you aren't a physician
Davie, "For the record",,,you simply are not qualified to make
judgements reserved for physicians only.

Anyone can make informed observations with the proper background. You
don't need to be licensed to do it, until you expect to get paid for
it.


Such a candidate would never
have the need to foster what they think of themselves in an
unsolicitited and gratuitous manner such as your low self-esteem
dictates.

More double speak? It is easily observed that you have assigned a much
greater worth to what I do, than I, myself, have ever stated. You are
the one who lied about my claiming to be a medical professional. You
are the one who claimed that I am some sort of master of the internet.
I have never made any such claims. The problem is YOU. You lie like a
rug.


I said that I enjoy
studying human psychology from my own
curiosity, as a hobby.

Nevertheless, you have permitted yourself to be reduced to fodder by
deluding yourself that you are as qualified as a licensed physician. You
are not.

I am qualified to see the virtually textbook example of Anti-social
personality disorder as expressed by your actions here.

(Now is a good time to once again remind us how this is only a
"cartoon character", and not who you really are) Uh huh.....



You respond in a
predictable manner, with anticipated
responses to carefully presented stimuli.

No wonder you and N8wwm get along so well. He posts about microchips
implanted in people with "programmed stimuli" and here you are echoing
his tripe.

Funny thing, he's right. You can't muster enough self control to not
respond to those "programmed stimuli". You are like a moth drawn
inexplicably to the flame, which will end up being its demise. That's
why we all laugh at you. You are all too transparent and predictable.
When I'm done with you, I'll stop posting again. But you can't resist
getting in the last word.

Your sociopathic behavior and your disregard for federal law makes you
the worst example of person society has to offer. You create
controversy and then feed off of the attention of others to bolster
your own low self esteem. You do what you want without due concern for
the rights of others. In short, you treat others as your own personal
litterbox.

.lmao..you really slip the hell up when you get mad, Davie.
You're garbage, Dave,,insane hammie garbage that gives the service a
black eye.

By operating on the freeband, you are neither a CB'er nor a ham. You
are nothing short of a lawbreaking radio pirate. So what does that
say? Who are you to criticize the operating habits of others when you
have a closet full of your own "issues"?

More hypocrisy.


Yet, when your picture is presented to you,


"MY" picture? I'm not the one, nor is anyone else in this group OR the
hamme groups, seeing you as qualified as a physician, radio repair
tech,or anything else your dragging self-esteem needs dictate in order
to soothe itself...hehe...this is YOUR "picture" Davie.

One does not need to be a "qualified" anything to see the obvious. All
one has to do is access the DSM-IV which is available in many places
on the internet, and look up APD, and then compare the symptoms with
your past behavior (Which is archived for posterity).

The only one in denial is you. But like the old saying: "When you try
to tell a nut that he's nuts, he'll swear that you're crazy."

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:29:28 GMT, Lancer wrote:

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:40:30 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:37:50 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
N3CVJ said
The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of
splatter and the distortion a signal may have.

It has everything to with it. For the amount of times you professed to
having talked skip on the freeband, followed by recent denials of you
talking skip, you should know that on MANY occasion, a signal can be
severely wavering from an S1 to an S9 (for but one of many
examples),,,when that signal is coming in at an S9, the splatter may be
intense if you changed the channel and went one up or down. When that
signal is coming in on a wavering S1, you will hear absolutely nothing
on your next channel. Once again, the wavering is a direct result
of...taa daaa....skip.


You may not hear anything on the next channel because the signal may
not be strong enough or because of "selective fading" . Splatter is
caused by the modulation, it may or may not be intensified by skip.
But it is not caused by "skip" If you had a constant carrier(no
modulation), skip or not, you wouldn't have splatter.

He probably thinks that FM won't skip either......

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:40:30 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:37:50 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
N3CVJ said
The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of
splatter and the distortion a signal may have.


As usual, you're wrong. End of story.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On 10 Jan 2005 12:45:36 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:
On 07 Jan 2005 21:22:30 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall) wrote:
So, you're telling me that you can't listen to a

channel and pick out who the most blatant

illegal operators are simply by the sound of

their rigs, and by the splatter they produce?

When the dx is running strong,

Donut matter. No one can tell me my S-Line is over-driven..even on local
ground wave. That said, there -are- way yonder too many splatter-masters
on 11 meters.

That depends on what you mean by "over-driven" Simply bumping up the
carrier power, will decrease your modulation, and will eventually
result in severe back swing. If it's excessive, the modulation will
also sound "fuzzy". At that point, it will be easy to see that it's
not a legal CB transmitter. But it may not be splattering all that
much.

If you bump up modulation to over 100%, then that will cause splatter,
which is also easily observed.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

That's not going to happen with my rig. Tune it and forget about it.

It's hard to hurt a quality radio.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:43:01 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On 07 Jan 2005 21:22:30 GMT, Steveo
wrote:
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall) wrote:
So, you're telling me that you can't listen to a
channel and pick out who the most blatant
illegal operators are simply by the sound of
their rigs, and by the splatter they produce?

When the dx is running strong,
_
Donut matter. No one can tell me my S-Line is over-driven..even on local
ground wave. That said, there -are- way yonder too many splatter-masters
on 11 meters.

That depends on what you mean by

"over-driven"

Good Gawdomighty,,,,,,here comes N3CVJ to tell *you* what you meant by
"over-driven".
Davie applies his own definitions to words that everyone else has no
problem comprehending.

When your thought processes (and I use the term loosely) are comprised
of a series of binary thought patterns, where everything is either
black or white, I can see why you might think that. But if you
actually KNEW something, (other than "CB Science") you'd know that the
term "overdriven" has many applications, as illustrated by my earlier
response.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:56:21 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote:

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:29:28 GMT, Lancer wrote:

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:40:30 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (DaveÂ*Hall)
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:37:50 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
N3CVJ said
The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of
splatter and the distortion a signal may have.

It has everything to with it. For the amount of times you professed to
having talked skip on the freeband, followed by recent denials of you
talking skip, you should know that on MANY occasion, a signal can be
severely wavering from an S1 to an S9 (for but one of many
examples),,,when that signal is coming in at an S9, the splatter may be
intense if you changed the channel and went one up or down. When that
signal is coming in on a wavering S1, you will hear absolutely nothing
on your next channel. Once again, the wavering is a direct result
of...taa daaa....skip.


You may not hear anything on the next channel because the signal may
not be strong enough or because of "selective fading" . Splatter is
caused by the modulation, it may or may not be intensified by skip.
But it is not caused by "skip" If you had a constant carrier(no
modulation), skip or not, you wouldn't have splatter.

He probably thinks that FM won't skip either......

Dave
"Sandbagger"

Who?

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 03:48:46 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"Lancer" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:19:54 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:57:27 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Dave Hall) wrote:
The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of splatter and the
distortion a signal may have. The only effect that "DX" may have is
heterodyning of co-channel signals. In any case, when my observations
were made, the "DX" was not running heavy enough that a clean sample
of any particular transmission could not be made.

Ummm, no Dave. DX has everything to do with DX splatter.


The only thing DX has to do with DX splatter is that if "DX" isn't
running you wouldn't hear it.

Probably, but if you have a 100 radio's and a third of
them are running their modulation clipped, then you
will hear it even worse, correct?

It would only be worse because now you can hear the 100 radios.

Splatter or out of bounds emissions are those falling outside the
normal bandwidth of a signal and are the result of modulation.


Correct

DX doesn't cause splatter it allows it to propgate farther.

Correct. When you have a lot more radio's trying to talk
on one freq, don't you think that it will now increase your
adjacent channel splatter?


Only because you now can hear more radios. skip doesn't cause
splatter.

Take the same 100 radios that were causing splatter when the skip was
running (all stations running S9). Now move them all so they are
local to you (again all stations running S9). From what you have said
you believe the splatter is going to decrease ?

N3CVJ wrote:
I tend to believe that if you have nothing to

hide, you have nothing to fear. I'm a

conservative.

If you actually believed that bull****, you would be a nudist.
If someone has nothing to hide, then why would they fear anything? And
of course if they do have something to hide, we would want the
government to know. After all, this is how the Jews lived in Nazi
Germany, the Ukrainians lived in the Soviet Empire, and how the Chinese
peasants lived under Emperor Mao.
Of course, Davie's nazi doctrine he adheres to is a well known slogan
of oppressive totalitarian regimes throughout history and is fascist,
something he confuses with extreme radical conservatism.


"One who would give up essential liberty obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither" B. Franklin


"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism" T. Jefferson

Lancer at rock.com wrote:

The only thing DX has to do with DX splatter is
that if "DX" isn't running you wouldn't hear it.


Which is what Davie took issue with.

Lancer wrote:
But it is not caused by "skip" If you had a

constant carrier(no modulation), skip or not,

you wouldn't have splatter.


Same is said for the harmonics Davie is speaking of.