On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:46:14 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
Dave Hall wrote in
:
I have hardly been "bewildered". I told you and everyone else how it was
done. It was done by utilizing a 7805 regulator to create a steady 5V
for the bias supply. The 5V was then dropped through a resistor and
applied to the base of each of the 2290 devices. The bias voltage was
limited to .6V by utilizing a forward biased diode on each transistor,
which was placed on top of each "pill" for heat tracking and stability.
It's not rocket science, for someone who knows what they're doing. You
know, I might just take a some pictures of the project and put them on
my website just to squash your incessant babble.

Exactly dave you just added ab-1 bias to the

am which certainly would clean it up, but what

would the spoiled kid in Tampa know he

doesnt even solder his mike plugs on.

_
I'm not in Tampa.

Interesting. He didn't deny the "spoiled" or the "kid" part......

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: 68.39.95.79
)
Frank Gilliland wrote in
: And until Dave can
provide an example where one of the allegedly illegal operators he
allegedly heard was found guilty, got an NAL, or even admitted his guilt
publically, then his allegations are nothing more than his opinions, not
facts.

Thats bull**** Frank and you know it, go to

web boards or even listen they admit thier

guilt.


I can say I shot Kennedy and watch gibbons like you run with it.


It is no different than people who speed

on the highway,


Not in feeble minds like yours, it isn't, despite being taught better
that one has the very real possibility to maim or kill.


I guess they are not doing

anything illegal until they get a speeding

ticket?? Even thought they are blowing by

cars doing the speedlimit.


You've proved your ignorance and incompetence concerning the law on
many occasion,,this is but another,.
Of course, since the mandatory speed in the US is a federally mandated
70 MPH limit, you hold anyone getting a speeding ticket over 70 is now a
guilty "federal criminal".
Consider yourself cleansed and baptized for the week.

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)

The Fcc requires no jury of peers. reart 95


Tell that to N3CVJ and his buddy N8WWM. Davie lobbies hard telling the
world that just because the FCC told the world N8WWM was jamming
repeaters, it's not evidence of guilt.

"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)

The Fcc requires no jury of peers. reart 95


Tell that to N3CVJ and his buddy N8WWM. Davie lobbies hard telling the
world that just because the FCC told the world N8WWM was jamming
repeaters, it's not evidence of guilt.

It's OK Twist, Geo can't ever seem to keep up with
a thread.
Here's what Dave typed:

"So you are of the Twisted notion that a person is not breaking the law
until they are caught?

Dave
"Sandbagger" "

To which I replied correct. Nothing in that statement does it say
breaking "FCC Rules". Geo will never admit to being wrong nor will he ever
admit to me being right, it would ruin his
image of being the #2 troll behind Doug.
Start your sexual innuendoes here Geo ::::::::::::

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(Twistedhed) wrote in news:24437-41E3D8B4-199
@storefull-3252.bay.webtv.net:
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
The Fcc requires no jury of peers. reart 95
Tell that to N3CVJ and his buddy N8WWM. Davie lobbies hard telling the
world that just because the FCC told the world N8WWM was jamming
repeaters, it's not evidence of guilt.

It is not evidence of guilt they charged him

with nothing.



N3CVJ says otherwise. He said his empirical observations are evidence of
guilt.

and landshark said you must have a jury of

your peers decide you to be guilty.



Landshark is correct. However, with certain charges brought by the FCC,
exceptions abound.

"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(Twistedhed) wrote in news:24437-41E3D8B4-199
@storefull-3252.bay.webtv.net:
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
The Fcc requires no jury of peers. reart 95
Tell that to N3CVJ and his buddy N8WWM. Davie lobbies hard telling the
world that just because the FCC told the world N8WWM was jamming
repeaters, it's not evidence of guilt.

It is not evidence of guilt they charged him

with nothing.



N3CVJ says otherwise. He said his empirical observations are evidence of
guilt.

and landshark said you must have a jury of

your peers decide you to be guilty.



Landshark is correct. However, with certain charges brought by the FCC,
exceptions abound.

Agreed. You have to sue the FCC to get your
fined reduced or refunded back to you, that's federal
justice for you.

Landshark


--
__
o /' )
/' ( ,
__/' ) .' `;
o _.-~~~~' ``---..__ .' ;
_.--' b) LANDSHARK ``--...____. .'
( _. )). `-._
`\|\|\|\|)-.....___.- `-. __...--'-.'.
`---......____...---`.___.'----... .' `.;
`-` `

N#CVJ wrote:
Uh... Nooooo. Splatter is the result of a dirty

transmitter,

Bleed,,splatter,,,,you're wrong, ya' know..a dirty transmitter is but
ONE example.............once again you incorrectly claimed that skip
does not affect splatter, when it most certainly does.

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:43:23 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

N#CVJ wrote:
Uh... Nooooo. Splatter is the result of a dirty

transmitter,

Bleed,,splatter,,,,you're wrong, ya' know..a dirty transmitter is but
ONE example.............once again you incorrectly claimed that skip
does not affect splatter, when it most certainly does.

It does not affect the amount of splatter a single signal has on it.

You really should stick to what it is you're actually good at
(Chumming perhaps?) and leave the discussion of RF theory to those of
us who DO know what we're talking about.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:43:23 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
N#CVJ wrote:
Uh... Nooooo. Splatter is the result of a dirty

transmitter,
Bleed,,splatter,,,,you're wrong, ya' know..a dirty transmitter is but
ONE example.............once again you incorrectly claimed that skip
does not affect splatter, when it most certainly does.

It does not affect the amount of splatter a

single signal has on it.


Skip affects splatter in he manner that if the skip isn't running, you
won't hear the splatter from a distant station across the country.

You really should stick to what it is you're

actually good at


Shoot, Davie,,I'm excellent at hanging you out to dry,,,your default
mode (making personal insults when you disagree) in your incredible
posting history removes any doubt.


(Chumming perhaps?) and leave the

discussion of RF theory to those of us who DO
know what we're talking about.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ

Which would be fine, except your self-professed knowledge has proved
just the opposite. You are an extra class hammie who maintains roger
beeps are illegal and that doing over 70 mph makes one a federal
criminal, illustrating you have no freakin' clue *what* you talk about,
but that never stops you from sticking your foot in your mouth and
telegraphing such learned ignorance.

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:57:17 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
that doing over 70 mph makes one a federal
criminal,

Not that I care or anything, but to avoid further embarrassment at
once again confusing me with another, I'd suggest you recheck your
obsession with personal searches. I never made that claim.

Dave
"Sandbagger"