Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:40:56 GMT, wrote: Yeah, but it's only a partial crock of ****. The rain gutters or wire or whatever are only half the dipole so the house wiring will become the other active half and they will radiate. He grounds his tuner to a ground rod, but also his coax to the radio will tie him in to the service ground of the residence. Why would his coax tie him to the service ground? Radio antenna connector to radio chassis ground. Radio chassis ground to radio power plug. Radio power plug to wall outlet. Wall outlet to service ground. What if he's using a power supply and mobile radio? |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:42:07 GMT, wrote:
I'm not a hater dude, but I *was* right about you running an amp and a keyclown radio i.e. 2510 or a Lincoln. No you weren't. It's pretty well known that a 10 watt output will be slightly better than a 4 watt output. It may be low level keyclowning, but it's keyclowning all the same. Link please. I want to know the requirements for keyclowning. Please provide evidence. This NG supplies all the evidence anyone needs, look at people like steveo and tnom, they are keyclowns, they run out of band and illegal power. Then if it's that simple, stop beating around the bush. Provide the sources. FYI, all I own right now for a base, is a newer 4 watt handheld, and the CB my father gave me in 1983, which can't be modded. And the only reason I have an amp in the car, is because I drive for a living, and drive in and out of mountains, and sometimes can't reach a damn trucker 1/2 mile away. And since I can get all over the world with that amp, there is no reason to get another one. I still dont understand what you feel is wrong with a regular CB base station antenna on your roof. Is it too simple for you? Well, it's damn ugly. I don't care. But my wife and neighbors might give a ****. And since I just don't want to deal with that. Sure but it's going to get really ugly when you go to ham. There will be cables everywhere, all kinds of electronic junk in the house, wires in the trees, plus you will get a really fat stomach, BO, and start complaining about your health on the air. No, I will keep it simple. Most setups I see have tons of equipment that is not even being used. So the only way to get a mulitband ham antenna is a multiband dipole (as far as I know). If I run the coax once into the woods, than I can use it when I go to ham. Then google multiband ham antennas and see that running 150 ft of coax underground is not the way to do it. Not what I heard. I heard that is totally dependent on the frequencies you transmit at. Some will have high loss, some will be negilgible. And this link here, at eham.net, shows many people running even farther runs than I do. http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/858 Vinnie S. |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:29:55 GMT, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:40:56 GMT, wrote: Yeah, but it's only a partial crock of ****. The rain gutters or wire or whatever are only half the dipole so the house wiring will become the other active half and they will radiate. He grounds his tuner to a ground rod, but also his coax to the radio will tie him in to the service ground of the residence. Why would his coax tie him to the service ground? Radio antenna connector to radio chassis ground. Radio chassis ground to radio power plug. Radio power plug to wall outlet. Wall outlet to service ground. Mobile radio with a power supply. Power supply has a transformer, which isolates it it from direct connection. The PS is an old RS unit which does not have a ground on it's plug. So in essence, you're wrong. Vinnie S. sigh. Look at a schematic sometime. The PS transformer ain't isolating *anything* from ground, dude. |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:43:16 GMT, "U Know Who" wrote:
You could use a ground mounted vertical. In that case, you'll be all set with the buried coax. I see a tree that should work well. I will take a measure to it. The ground is rather wet there, so I think grounding it there will be ideal. Vinnie S. |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Sure but it's going to get really ugly when you go to ham. There will be cables everywhere, all kinds of electronic junk in the house, wires in the trees, plus you will get a really fat stomach, BO, and start complaining about your health on the air. Like this: http://n8wwm.4t.com/photo.html hehe |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
80/160 trap dipole question - last one I hope | Antenna | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy | |||
70 ohm dipole to 50 ohm feed line question | Antenna |