Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:00:04 GMT, SideBand wrote:
Vinnie S. wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:56:39 GMT, SideBand wrote: That I can do. I got 16" between the joists, and stick the coil directly under the antenna. So if you are looking from an overhead view, the antenna is directly in the middle of the open part of the coil. The GP wires will be over it. Is this correct? It sounds like a plan. Thanks for your help ! Vinnie S. Yep.. you got it this time. Looking down the antenna, you're looking at an "O" (the choke) with the antenna being the center point of the circle. Wires physically above the coil. Good luck. That's what us HAMs are supposed to be here for. -SSB The PVC condiut is up. I ran a conduit so I can run the coax right to the basement, from the attic. I will make a run tomorrow to get coax and supplies. The Firestik arrived. Also, I roughly measured the distance to the tree where I want to put a permanent antenna. The distance is huge, about 275 feet of total coax. I figured I can use LMR-400DB (direct burial). I estimate about 2 dB loss at that distance. How much power loss is that on a HR-2510, using a Imax-2000 with a GP kit, assuming a good SWR? I am not running power. Will that antenna offset that loss by itself?I really don't have a choice. It's not going on the house. Besides, the damn house is too low anyway. I can get way higher on the tree. Vinnie S. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vinnie S. wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:00:04 GMT, SideBand wrote: Vinnie S. wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:56:39 GMT, SideBand wrote: That I can do. I got 16" between the joists, and stick the coil directly under the antenna. So if you are looking from an overhead view, the antenna is directly in the middle of the open part of the coil. The GP wires will be over it. Is this correct? It sounds like a plan. Thanks for your help ! Vinnie S. Yep.. you got it this time. Looking down the antenna, you're looking at an "O" (the choke) with the antenna being the center point of the circle. Wires physically above the coil. Good luck. That's what us HAMs are supposed to be here for. -SSB The PVC condiut is up. I ran a conduit so I can run the coax right to the basement, from the attic. I will make a run tomorrow to get coax and supplies. The Firestik arrived. Also, I roughly measured the distance to the tree where I want to put a permanent antenna. The distance is huge, about 275 feet of total coax. I figured I can use LMR-400DB (direct burial). I estimate about 2 dB loss at that distance. How much power loss is that on a HR-2510, using a Imax-2000 with a GP kit, assuming a good SWR? I am not running power. Will that antenna offset that loss by itself?I really don't have a choice. It's not going on the house. Besides, the damn house is too low anyway. I can get way higher on the tree. Vinnie S. Vin: Your loss will actually fall somewhere between 1.89 and 2dB. 2 db equates to roughly 23% power loss, assuming 1:1 SWR at the antenna. Since 1:1 isn't easily attained (you can't get it with a resonant dipole or a 1/4 wave whip without some sort of feed point matching, and then you lose some radiation efficiency), you can assume you're going to get some additional feed line (coax) losses (heating, mostly) because of the mismatch at the antenna. For that run I would highly suggest staying away from coax and see if you can find some 200 ohm twinlead. Output coax from the radio to the outside to a 4:1 balun to the twinlead to a 4:1 balun (in reverse), to about 20 feet of coax to the antenna. Losses will be MUCH lower than with coax. The other option would be 450 ohm twinlead (ladderline) and a 9:1 balun at both ends. Ladderline is running about $0.19 +/- a foot, depending on where you're getting it. The cost for the baluns and the ladderline WILL be less than the run of LMR400. The caveat here will be that you will need to keep the ladderline well away from ALL metal.. within about a foot of the ladderline. For that long of a run, I would personally run a pair of 9:1 baluns and the 450 ohm ladderline. The cost and the losses will be lowest there. The reason for the 25' of coax at the antenna end is to keep the ladderline from being unbalanced by the antenna. Estimated losses for the 9:1's and 450 ohm... .6 db (and that's at the highest), depending on the quality of the baluns. Less than 5% power loss, and not quite so much effect due to poor SWR at the end. Your dipole should see about a 1.3:1 - 1.5:1 SWR across the CB band. If it's possible to make a "V" antenna in the branches (inverted or not) the SWR could be lower, and you could definitely see some improvements over a vertical dipole. HTH -SSB |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:23:53 GMT, SideBand wrote:
The PVC condiut is up. I ran a conduit so I can run the coax right to the basement, from the attic. I will make a run tomorrow to get coax and supplies. The Firestik arrived. Also, I roughly measured the distance to the tree where I want to put a permanent antenna. The distance is huge, about 275 feet of total coax. I figured I can use LMR-400DB (direct burial). I estimate about 2 dB loss at that distance. How much power loss is that on a HR-2510, using a Imax-2000 with a GP kit, assuming a good SWR? I am not running power. Will that antenna offset that loss by itself?I really don't have a choice. It's not going on the house. Besides, the damn house is too low anyway. I can get way higher on the tree. Vinnie S. Vin: Your loss will actually fall somewhere between 1.89 and 2dB. 2 db equates to roughly 23% power loss, assuming 1:1 SWR at the antenna. Since 1:1 isn't easily attained (you can't get it with a resonant dipole or a 1/4 wave whip without some sort of feed point matching, and then you lose some radiation efficiency), you can assume you're going to get some additional feed line (coax) losses (heating, mostly) because of the mismatch at the antenna. For that run I would highly suggest staying away from coax and see if you can find some 200 ohm twinlead. Output coax from the radio to the outside to a 4:1 balun to the twinlead to a 4:1 balun (in reverse), to about 20 feet of coax to the antenna. Losses will be MUCH lower than with coax. If I have the HR-2510 at 10 Watts DK, I am still putting out about 7.5 watts. If I turn up the DK to about 20 watts, I can still transmit about 15.5 watts. I guess that is not bad. I guess the point is I can still get at least the power of a standard CB with an antenna directly overhead. The other option would be 450 ohm twinlead (ladderline) and a 9:1 balun at both ends. Ladderline is running about $0.19 +/- a foot, depending on where you're getting it. The cost for the baluns and the ladderline WILL be less than the run of LMR400. The caveat here will be that you will need to keep the ladderline well away from ALL metal.. within about a foot of the ladderline. This will be a major problem. I have all my plumbing well within a foot, across the entire length of the house. All where I would bring the ladder line into the house. I cannot move the entry point without some serious digging and entering from the front of the house. There are numerous obstacles like the driveway and sidewalk. I will have to look into the 200 ohm twin lead. For that long of a run, I would personally run a pair of 9:1 baluns and the 450 ohm ladderline. The cost and the losses will be lowest there. The reason for the 25' of coax at the antenna end is to keep the ladderline from being unbalanced by the antenna. Estimated losses for the 9:1's and 450 ohm... .6 db (and that's at the highest), depending on the quality of the baluns. Less than 5% power loss, and not quite so much effect due to poor SWR at the end. Your dipole should see about a 1.3:1 - 1.5:1 SWR across the CB band. If it's possible to make a "V" antenna in the branches (inverted or not) the SWR could be lower, and you could definitely see some improvements over a vertical dipole. In the attic, I am using a 6 foot Firestik. It is the highest I can go up there. It is an electrical 5/8 wave, though physical 6 feet. I am using 8 pieces of 9 foot wires as a ground plane. Luckily, I have electricians in the family. This should work OK for now? Vinnie S. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lancer" wrote in message news:dhcnv0h9f7k8qtlq1fjbrn0ef8t35mojgm@2355323778 ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:35:18 -0500, Vinnie S. wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:23:53 GMT, SideBand wrote: The PVC condiut is up. I ran a conduit so I can run the coax right to the basement, from the attic. I will make a run tomorrow to get coax and supplies. The Firestik arrived. Also, I roughly measured the distance to the tree where I want to put a permanent antenna. The distance is huge, about 275 feet of total coax. I figured I can use LMR-400DB (direct burial). I estimate about 2 dB loss at that distance. How much power loss is that on a HR-2510, using a Imax-2000 with a GP kit, assuming a good SWR? I am not running power. Will that antenna offset that loss by itself?I really don't have a choice. It's not going on the house. Besides, the damn house is too low anyway. I can get way higher on the tree. Vinnie S. Vin: Your loss will actually fall somewhere between 1.89 and 2dB. 2 db equates to roughly 23% power loss, assuming 1:1 SWR at the antenna. Since 1:1 isn't easily attained (you can't get it with a resonant dipole or a 1/4 wave whip without some sort of feed point matching, and then you lose some radiation efficiency), you can assume you're going to get some additional feed line (coax) losses (heating, mostly) because of the mismatch at the antenna. For that run I would highly suggest staying away from coax and see if you can find some 200 ohm twinlead. Output coax from the radio to the outside to a 4:1 balun to the twinlead to a 4:1 balun (in reverse), to about 20 feet of coax to the antenna. Losses will be MUCH lower than with coax. If I have the HR-2510 at 10 Watts DK, I am still putting out about 7.5 watts. If I turn up the DK to about 20 watts, I can still transmit about 15.5 watts. I guess that is not bad. I guess the point is I can still get at least the power of a standard CB with an antenna directly overhead. The other option would be 450 ohm twinlead (ladderline) and a 9:1 balun at both ends. Ladderline is running about $0.19 +/- a foot, depending on where you're getting it. The cost for the baluns and the ladderline WILL be less than the run of LMR400. The caveat here will be that you will need to keep the ladderline well away from ALL metal.. within about a foot of the ladderline. This will be a major problem. I have all my plumbing well within a foot, across the entire length of the house. All where I would bring the ladder line into the house. I cannot move the entry point without some serious digging and entering from the front of the house. There are numerous obstacles like the driveway and sidewalk. I will have to look into the 200 ohm twin lead. For that long of a run, I would personally run a pair of 9:1 baluns and the 450 ohm ladderline. The cost and the losses will be lowest there. The reason for the 25' of coax at the antenna end is to keep the ladderline from being unbalanced by the antenna. Estimated losses for the 9:1's and 450 ohm... .6 db (and that's at the highest), depending on the quality of the baluns. Less than 5% power loss, and not quite so much effect due to poor SWR at the end. Your dipole should see about a 1.3:1 - 1.5:1 SWR across the CB band. If it's possible to make a "V" antenna in the branches (inverted or not) the SWR could be lower, and you could definitely see some improvements over a vertical dipole. In the attic, I am using a 6 foot Firestik. It is the highest I can go up there. It is an electrical 5/8 wave, though physical 6 feet. I am using 8 pieces of 9 foot wires as a ground plane. Luckily, I have electricians in the family. This should work OK for now? Vinnie S. Your firestick is not an electrical 5/8 wave, the only thing 5.8 wave about the firestick is the length of wire the wind on the antenna. Lancer, does the term "electrical" not indicate the length of wire? He did not say physical. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lancer" wrote in message news:h0dnv09thrmmfbmtln9llck6p044ufscfl@2355323778 ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:23:53 GMT, SideBand wrote: Vinnie S. wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:00:04 GMT, SideBand wrote: Vinnie S. wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:56:39 GMT, SideBand wrote: That I can do. I got 16" between the joists, and stick the coil directly under the antenna. So if you are looking from an overhead view, the antenna is directly in the middle of the open part of the coil. The GP wires will be over it. Is this correct? It sounds like a plan. Thanks for your help ! Vinnie S. Yep.. you got it this time. Looking down the antenna, you're looking at an "O" (the choke) with the antenna being the center point of the circle. Wires physically above the coil. Good luck. That's what us HAMs are supposed to be here for. -SSB The PVC condiut is up. I ran a conduit so I can run the coax right to the basement, from the attic. I will make a run tomorrow to get coax and supplies. The Firestik arrived. Also, I roughly measured the distance to the tree where I want to put a permanent antenna. The distance is huge, about 275 feet of total coax. I figured I can use LMR-400DB (direct burial). I estimate about 2 dB loss at that distance. How much power loss is that on a HR-2510, using a Imax-2000 with a GP kit, assuming a good SWR? I am not running power. Will that antenna offset that loss by itself?I really don't have a choice. It's not going on the house. Besides, the damn house is too low anyway. I can get way higher on the tree. Vinnie S. Vin: Your loss will actually fall somewhere between 1.89 and 2dB. 2 db equates to roughly 23% power loss, assuming 1:1 SWR at the antenna. Since 1:1 isn't easily attained (you can't get it with a resonant dipole or a 1/4 wave whip without some sort of feed point matching, and then you lose some radiation efficiency), you can assume you're going to get some additional feed line (coax) losses (heating, mostly) because of the mismatch at the antenna. For that run I would highly suggest staying away from coax and see if you can find some 200 ohm twinlead. Output coax from the radio to the outside to a 4:1 balun to the twinlead to a 4:1 balun (in reverse), to about 20 feet of coax to the antenna. Losses will be MUCH lower than with coax. The other option would be 450 ohm twinlead (ladderline) and a 9:1 balun at both ends. Ladderline is running about $0.19 +/- a foot, depending on where you're getting it. The cost for the baluns and the ladderline WILL be less than the run of LMR400. Great idea, trash one of baluns and use a MFJ-949E at the transmitter end.. The caveat here will be that you will need to keep the ladderline well away from ALL metal.. within about a foot of the ladderline. For that long of a run, I would personally run a pair of 9:1 baluns and the 450 ohm ladderline. The cost and the losses will be lowest there. The reason for the 25' of coax at the antenna end is to keep the ladderline from being unbalanced by the antenna. Isn't that why you put a balun on the antenna end? Why use 25 feet? Estimated losses for the 9:1's and 450 ohm... .6 db (and that's at the highest), depending on the quality of the baluns. Less than 5% power loss, and not quite so much effect due to poor SWR at the end. Your dipole should see about a 1.3:1 - 1.5:1 SWR across the CB band. If it's possible to make a "V" antenna in the branches (inverted or not) the SWR could be lower, and you could definitely see some improvements over a vertical dipole. HTH -SSB If he is going to build an inverted V , or dipole there is no reason to use a balun at all.. ladder line to the antenna, and tuner at the transmit end.. Maybe the output of the radio is a reason? I have yet to see a CB with balanced output. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "U Know Who" wrote in message ... "Lancer" wrote in message news:h0dnv09thrmmfbmtln9llck6p044ufscfl@2355323778 ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:23:53 GMT, SideBand wrote: Vinnie S. wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:00:04 GMT, SideBand wrote: Vinnie S. wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:56:39 GMT, SideBand wrote: That I can do. I got 16" between the joists, and stick the coil directly under the antenna. So if you are looking from an overhead view, the antenna is directly in the middle of the open part of the coil. The GP wires will be over it. Is this correct? It sounds like a plan. Thanks for your help ! Vinnie S. Yep.. you got it this time. Looking down the antenna, you're looking at an "O" (the choke) with the antenna being the center point of the circle. Wires physically above the coil. Good luck. That's what us HAMs are supposed to be here for. -SSB The PVC condiut is up. I ran a conduit so I can run the coax right to the basement, from the attic. I will make a run tomorrow to get coax and supplies. The Firestik arrived. Also, I roughly measured the distance to the tree where I want to put a permanent antenna. The distance is huge, about 275 feet of total coax. I figured I can use LMR-400DB (direct burial). I estimate about 2 dB loss at that distance. How much power loss is that on a HR-2510, using a Imax-2000 with a GP kit, assuming a good SWR? I am not running power. Will that antenna offset that loss by itself?I really don't have a choice. It's not going on the house. Besides, the damn house is too low anyway. I can get way higher on the tree. Vinnie S. Vin: Your loss will actually fall somewhere between 1.89 and 2dB. 2 db equates to roughly 23% power loss, assuming 1:1 SWR at the antenna. Since 1:1 isn't easily attained (you can't get it with a resonant dipole or a 1/4 wave whip without some sort of feed point matching, and then you lose some radiation efficiency), you can assume you're going to get some additional feed line (coax) losses (heating, mostly) because of the mismatch at the antenna. For that run I would highly suggest staying away from coax and see if you can find some 200 ohm twinlead. Output coax from the radio to the outside to a 4:1 balun to the twinlead to a 4:1 balun (in reverse), to about 20 feet of coax to the antenna. Losses will be MUCH lower than with coax. The other option would be 450 ohm twinlead (ladderline) and a 9:1 balun at both ends. Ladderline is running about $0.19 +/- a foot, depending on where you're getting it. The cost for the baluns and the ladderline WILL be less than the run of LMR400. Great idea, trash one of baluns and use a MFJ-949E at the transmitter end.. The caveat here will be that you will need to keep the ladderline well away from ALL metal.. within about a foot of the ladderline. For that long of a run, I would personally run a pair of 9:1 baluns and the 450 ohm ladderline. The cost and the losses will be lowest there. The reason for the 25' of coax at the antenna end is to keep the ladderline from being unbalanced by the antenna. Isn't that why you put a balun on the antenna end? Why use 25 feet? Estimated losses for the 9:1's and 450 ohm... .6 db (and that's at the highest), depending on the quality of the baluns. Less than 5% power loss, and not quite so much effect due to poor SWR at the end. Your dipole should see about a 1.3:1 - 1.5:1 SWR across the CB band. If it's possible to make a "V" antenna in the branches (inverted or not) the SWR could be lower, and you could definitely see some improvements over a vertical dipole. HTH -SSB If he is going to build an inverted V , or dipole there is no reason to use a balun at all.. ladder line to the antenna, and tuner at the transmit end.. Maybe the output of the radio is a reason? I have yet to see a CB with balanced output. Although cheap and nasty, the choke method works, without investing in the cost of a tuner. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vinnie S. wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:23:53 GMT, SideBand wrote: The PVC condiut is up. I ran a conduit so I can run the coax right to the basement, from the attic. I will make a run tomorrow to get coax and supplies. The Firestik arrived. Also, I roughly measured the distance to the tree where I want to put a permanent antenna. The distance is huge, about 275 feet of total coax. I figured I can use LMR-400DB (direct burial). I estimate about 2 dB loss at that distance. How much power loss is that on a HR-2510, using a Imax-2000 with a GP kit, assuming a good SWR? I am not running power. Will that antenna offset that loss by itself?I really don't have a choice. It's not going on the house. Besides, the damn house is too low anyway. I can get way higher on the tree. Vinnie S. Vin: Your loss will actually fall somewhere between 1.89 and 2dB. 2 db equates to roughly 23% power loss, assuming 1:1 SWR at the antenna. Since 1:1 isn't easily attained (you can't get it with a resonant dipole or a 1/4 wave whip without some sort of feed point matching, and then you lose some radiation efficiency), you can assume you're going to get some additional feed line (coax) losses (heating, mostly) because of the mismatch at the antenna. For that run I would highly suggest staying away from coax and see if you can find some 200 ohm twinlead. Output coax from the radio to the outside to a 4:1 balun to the twinlead to a 4:1 balun (in reverse), to about 20 feet of coax to the antenna. Losses will be MUCH lower than with coax. If I have the HR-2510 at 10 Watts DK, I am still putting out about 7.5 watts. If I turn up the DK to about 20 watts, I can still transmit about 15.5 watts. I guess that is not bad. I guess the point is I can still get at least the power of a standard CB with an antenna directly overhead. The other option would be 450 ohm twinlead (ladderline) and a 9:1 balun at both ends. Ladderline is running about $0.19 +/- a foot, depending on where you're getting it. The cost for the baluns and the ladderline WILL be less than the run of LMR400. The caveat here will be that you will need to keep the ladderline well away from ALL metal.. within about a foot of the ladderline. This will be a major problem. I have all my plumbing well within a foot, across the entire length of the house. All where I would bring the ladder line into the house. I cannot move the entry point without some serious digging and entering from the front of the house. There are numerous obstacles like the driveway and sidewalk. I will have to look into the 200 ohm twin lead. For that long of a run, I would personally run a pair of 9:1 baluns and the 450 ohm ladderline. The cost and the losses will be lowest there. The reason for the 25' of coax at the antenna end is to keep the ladderline from being unbalanced by the antenna. Estimated losses for the 9:1's and 450 ohm... .6 db (and that's at the highest), depending on the quality of the baluns. Less than 5% power loss, and not quite so much effect due to poor SWR at the end. Your dipole should see about a 1.3:1 - 1.5:1 SWR across the CB band. If it's possible to make a "V" antenna in the branches (inverted or not) the SWR could be lower, and you could definitely see some improvements over a vertical dipole. In the attic, I am using a 6 foot Firestik. It is the highest I can go up there. It is an electrical 5/8 wave, though physical 6 feet. I am using 8 pieces of 9 foot wires as a ground plane. Luckily, I have electricians in the family. This should work OK for now? Vinnie S. No, no... You'd use coax to get out of the house, use the balun to switch to the ladderline OUTSIDE the house, then switch back to coax thru the other balun 20'-25' from the antenna. -SSB |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:49:38 GMT, SideBand wrote:
That can work ! Vinnie S. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:56:30 GMT, "U Know Who" wrote:
"Lancer" wrote in message news:dhcnv0h9f7k8qtlq1fjbrn0ef8t35mojgm@235532377 8... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:35:18 -0500, Vinnie S. wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:23:53 GMT, SideBand wrote: The PVC condiut is up. I ran a conduit so I can run the coax right to the basement, from the attic. I will make a run tomorrow to get coax and supplies. The Firestik arrived. Also, I roughly measured the distance to the tree where I want to put a permanent antenna. The distance is huge, about 275 feet of total coax. I figured I can use LMR-400DB (direct burial). I estimate about 2 dB loss at that distance. How much power loss is that on a HR-2510, using a Imax-2000 with a GP kit, assuming a good SWR? I am not running power. Will that antenna offset that loss by itself?I really don't have a choice. It's not going on the house. Besides, the damn house is too low anyway. I can get way higher on the tree. Vinnie S. Vin: Your loss will actually fall somewhere between 1.89 and 2dB. 2 db equates to roughly 23% power loss, assuming 1:1 SWR at the antenna. Since 1:1 isn't easily attained (you can't get it with a resonant dipole or a 1/4 wave whip without some sort of feed point matching, and then you lose some radiation efficiency), you can assume you're going to get some additional feed line (coax) losses (heating, mostly) because of the mismatch at the antenna. For that run I would highly suggest staying away from coax and see if you can find some 200 ohm twinlead. Output coax from the radio to the outside to a 4:1 balun to the twinlead to a 4:1 balun (in reverse), to about 20 feet of coax to the antenna. Losses will be MUCH lower than with coax. If I have the HR-2510 at 10 Watts DK, I am still putting out about 7.5 watts. If I turn up the DK to about 20 watts, I can still transmit about 15.5 watts. I guess that is not bad. I guess the point is I can still get at least the power of a standard CB with an antenna directly overhead. The other option would be 450 ohm twinlead (ladderline) and a 9:1 balun at both ends. Ladderline is running about $0.19 +/- a foot, depending on where you're getting it. The cost for the baluns and the ladderline WILL be less than the run of LMR400. The caveat here will be that you will need to keep the ladderline well away from ALL metal.. within about a foot of the ladderline. This will be a major problem. I have all my plumbing well within a foot, across the entire length of the house. All where I would bring the ladder line into the house. I cannot move the entry point without some serious digging and entering from the front of the house. There are numerous obstacles like the driveway and sidewalk. I will have to look into the 200 ohm twin lead. For that long of a run, I would personally run a pair of 9:1 baluns and the 450 ohm ladderline. The cost and the losses will be lowest there. The reason for the 25' of coax at the antenna end is to keep the ladderline from being unbalanced by the antenna. Estimated losses for the 9:1's and 450 ohm... .6 db (and that's at the highest), depending on the quality of the baluns. Less than 5% power loss, and not quite so much effect due to poor SWR at the end. Your dipole should see about a 1.3:1 - 1.5:1 SWR across the CB band. If it's possible to make a "V" antenna in the branches (inverted or not) the SWR could be lower, and you could definitely see some improvements over a vertical dipole. In the attic, I am using a 6 foot Firestik. It is the highest I can go up there. It is an electrical 5/8 wave, though physical 6 feet. I am using 8 pieces of 9 foot wires as a ground plane. Luckily, I have electricians in the family. This should work OK for now? Vinnie S. Your firestick is not an electrical 5/8 wave, the only thing 5.8 wave about the firestick is the length of wire the wind on the antenna. Lancer, does the term "electrical" not indicate the length of wire? He did not say physical. Here is my quote: "It is an electrical 5/8 wave, though physical 6 feet." Here is the Firestik website. http://www.firestik.com/CatalogFrame.htm 3. Some "experts" may "claim" 5/8 wave mobile antennas are not possible because they would need to be 23 feet high. They are wrong! Physical length and ground wave performance are not the same. If you ever hear someone make that claim, ask them how a handheld CB can have a 1/4 wave antenna 8 inches long and mobile 1/4 wave antennas can be anywhere from 12-60 inches long in spite of the fact that a physical 1/4 wave is 108 inches. Vinnie S. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:52:30 -0500, Vinnie S.
wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:56:30 GMT, "U Know Who" wrote: "Lancer" wrote in message news:dhcnv0h9f7k8qtlq1fjbrn0ef8t35mojgm@23553237 78... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:35:18 -0500, Vinnie S. wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:23:53 GMT, SideBand wrote: The PVC condiut is up. I ran a conduit so I can run the coax right to the basement, from the attic. I will make a run tomorrow to get coax and supplies. The Firestik arrived. Also, I roughly measured the distance to the tree where I want to put a permanent antenna. The distance is huge, about 275 feet of total coax. I figured I can use LMR-400DB (direct burial). I estimate about 2 dB loss at that distance. How much power loss is that on a HR-2510, using a Imax-2000 with a GP kit, assuming a good SWR? I am not running power. Will that antenna offset that loss by itself?I really don't have a choice. It's not going on the house. Besides, the damn house is too low anyway. I can get way higher on the tree. Vinnie S. Vin: Your loss will actually fall somewhere between 1.89 and 2dB. 2 db equates to roughly 23% power loss, assuming 1:1 SWR at the antenna. Since 1:1 isn't easily attained (you can't get it with a resonant dipole or a 1/4 wave whip without some sort of feed point matching, and then you lose some radiation efficiency), you can assume you're going to get some additional feed line (coax) losses (heating, mostly) because of the mismatch at the antenna. For that run I would highly suggest staying away from coax and see if you can find some 200 ohm twinlead. Output coax from the radio to the outside to a 4:1 balun to the twinlead to a 4:1 balun (in reverse), to about 20 feet of coax to the antenna. Losses will be MUCH lower than with coax. If I have the HR-2510 at 10 Watts DK, I am still putting out about 7.5 watts. If I turn up the DK to about 20 watts, I can still transmit about 15.5 watts. I guess that is not bad. I guess the point is I can still get at least the power of a standard CB with an antenna directly overhead. The other option would be 450 ohm twinlead (ladderline) and a 9:1 balun at both ends. Ladderline is running about $0.19 +/- a foot, depending on where you're getting it. The cost for the baluns and the ladderline WILL be less than the run of LMR400. The caveat here will be that you will need to keep the ladderline well away from ALL metal.. within about a foot of the ladderline. This will be a major problem. I have all my plumbing well within a foot, across the entire length of the house. All where I would bring the ladder line into the house. I cannot move the entry point without some serious digging and entering from the front of the house. There are numerous obstacles like the driveway and sidewalk. I will have to look into the 200 ohm twin lead. For that long of a run, I would personally run a pair of 9:1 baluns and the 450 ohm ladderline. The cost and the losses will be lowest there. The reason for the 25' of coax at the antenna end is to keep the ladderline from being unbalanced by the antenna. Estimated losses for the 9:1's and 450 ohm... .6 db (and that's at the highest), depending on the quality of the baluns. Less than 5% power loss, and not quite so much effect due to poor SWR at the end. Your dipole should see about a 1.3:1 - 1.5:1 SWR across the CB band. If it's possible to make a "V" antenna in the branches (inverted or not) the SWR could be lower, and you could definitely see some improvements over a vertical dipole. In the attic, I am using a 6 foot Firestik. It is the highest I can go up there. It is an electrical 5/8 wave, though physical 6 feet. I am using 8 pieces of 9 foot wires as a ground plane. Luckily, I have electricians in the family. This should work OK for now? Vinnie S. Your firestick is not an electrical 5/8 wave, the only thing 5.8 wave about the firestick is the length of wire the wind on the antenna. Lancer, does the term "electrical" not indicate the length of wire? He did not say physical. Here is my quote: "It is an electrical 5/8 wave, though physical 6 feet." Here is the Firestik website. http://www.firestik.com/CatalogFrame.htm 3. Some "experts" may "claim" 5/8 wave mobile antennas are not possible because they would need to be 23 feet high. They are wrong! Physical length and ground wave performance are not the same. If you ever hear someone make that claim, ask them how a handheld CB can have a 1/4 wave antenna 8 inches long and mobile 1/4 wave antennas can be anywhere from 12-60 inches long in spite of the fact that a physical 1/4 wave is 108 inches. Vinnie S. LOL! Looks like the same e-mail that firestick sent to me when I told them they didn't have a 6 foot 5/8 wave antenna. A 5/8 wave antenna a feedpoint impedance of about 150 - j600 ohms. Now if you think that will match your CB, hey more power to you. I have this bridge for sale... you know the rest... You have a 6 foot antenna that is 1/4 wave electrical length.. They are good antennas, but they are not a 5/8 wave antenna... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interesting question | CB | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
Matching transformer question. | Shortwave | |||
BPL Video On-Line | Policy | |||
Question regarding police tactics and scanners | Scanner |