"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote in message ...
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote in :

Frank Twistedhed Gilliand advocates law breaking when he wrote:

"If you have a scanner, spend a few days listening in on some of your
neighbors' telephone conversations. You might be suprised.




http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cyberc...p2510_2522.htm

Is it legal to intercept or record other people's cordless or cellular
phone calls?


Federal law prohibits the intentional eavesdropping of cordless and
cellular telephone conversations. (18 USC 2510) Another federal law, the
"Counterfeit Access Device Law," has recently been amended to make it
illegal to use a radio scanner "knowingly and with the intent to
defraud" to eavesdrop on wire or electronic communication. (18 USC 1029)
Penalties for the intentional interception of cordless and cellular
telephone range from fines to imprisonment depending on the
circumstances. (18 USC 2511, 2701)




You forgot this little part:
(16) "readily accessible to the general public" means, with respect to a
radio communication, that such communication is not--

(A) scrambled or encrypted;

(B) transmitted using modulation techniques whose essential parameters
have been withheld from the public with the intention of preserving the
privacy of such communication;

(C) carried on a subcarrier or other signal subsidiary to a radio
transmission;

(D) transmitted over a communication system provided by a common carrier,
unless the communication is a tone only paging system communication; or

(E) transmitted on frequencies allocated under part 25, subpart D, E, or F
of part 74, or part 94 of the Rules of the Federal Communications
Commission, unless, in the case of a communication transmitted on a
frequency allocated under part 74 that is not exclusively allocated to
broadcast auxiliary services, the communication is a two-way voice
communication by radio;



Cell phones are protected. Part 15 common cordless phones are not.

"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote in message ...
"U Know Who" wrote in news:F7hKd.76421$Ta2.35131
@fe2.texas.rr.com:

http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cyberc...p2510_2522.htm


Ok Crackhead, school is in session, again... Read the page for starters
it is listed as ""Definitions. ok further read exactly what is
says..thanks for pointing out cordless are on part 15 which Can be
transmitted on those frequencies.



Part 16 that such communication is "Not"

E) transmitted on frequencies allocated under part 25, subpart D, E, or F
of part 74, or part 94 of the Rules of the Federal Communications
Commission, unless, in the case of a communication transmitted on a
frequency allocated under part 74 that is not exclusively allocated to
broadcast auxiliary services, the communication is a two-way voice
communication by radio;









(16) "readily accessible to the general public" means, with respect to a
radio communication, that such communication is not--

(A) scrambled or encrypted;

(B) transmitted using modulation techniques whose essential parameters
have been withheld from the public with the intention of preserving the
privacy of such communication;

(C) carried on a subcarrier or other signal subsidiary to a radio
transmission;

(D) transmitted over a communication system provided by a common carrier,
unless the communication is a tone only paging system communication; or

(E) transmitted on frequencies allocated under part 25, subpart D, E, or
F of part 74, or part 94 of the Rules of the Federal Communications
Commission, unless, in the case of a communication transmitted on a
frequency allocated under part 74 that is not exclusively allocated to
broadcast auxiliary services, the communication is a two-way voice
communication by radio;


It's an exception, moron. Can you not read English? My bad, silly question.
Look, I'll explain it to you. There are cordless phones that us spread
spectrum technology, there are others that can scramble. Those are included
in your argument. Simple, FM, 900Mhz phones are not. And no matter what, if
they are part 15 devices, they ARE fair game. Didn't you get a bad enough
taste of crow on your last crusade? You know, the one about roger beeps?

I hate it when I'm scanning 46.610-46.930 and some knucklehead turns on his
cordless phone and makes a call. Maybe I preferred the 'dead air' and didn't
really want to hear about his life!


"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote in message ...
"U Know Who" wrote in
:


"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote in message
...
"U Know Who" wrote in news:F7hKd.76421$Ta2.35131
@fe2.texas.rr.com:

http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cyberc...p2510_2522.htm


Ok Crackhead, school is in session, again... Read the page for
starters it is listed as ""Definitions. ok further read exactly what
is says..thanks for pointing out cordless are on part 15 which Can be
transmitted on those frequencies.



Part 16 that such communication is "Not"

E) transmitted on frequencies allocated under part 25, subpart D, E,
or F of part 74, or part 94 of the Rules of the Federal
Communications Commission, unless, in the case of a communication
transmitted on a frequency allocated under part 74 that is not
exclusively allocated to broadcast auxiliary services, the
communication is a two-way voice communication by radio;









(16) "readily accessible to the general public" means, with respect
to a radio communication, that such communication is not--

(A) scrambled or encrypted;

(B) transmitted using modulation techniques whose essential
parameters have been withheld from the public with the intention of
preserving the privacy of such communication;

(C) carried on a subcarrier or other signal subsidiary to a radio
transmission;

(D) transmitted over a communication system provided by a common
carrier, unless the communication is a tone only paging system
communication; or

(E) transmitted on frequencies allocated under part 25, subpart D, E,
or F of part 74, or part 94 of the Rules of the Federal
Communications Commission, unless, in the case of a communication
transmitted on a frequency allocated under part 74 that is not
exclusively allocated to broadcast auxiliary services, the
communication is a two-way voice communication by radio;


It's an exception, moron. Can you not read English? My bad, silly
question. Look, I'll explain it to you. There are cordless phones that
us spread spectrum technology, there are others that can scramble.
Those are included in your argument. Simple, FM, 900Mhz phones are
not. And no matter what, if they are part 15 devices, they ARE fair
game. Didn't you get a bad enough taste of crow on your last crusade?
You know, the one about roger beeps?







No where does it say anything is an exception? do you think the law
cares what Frequency your phone call is on saying you can listen to 49
mhz but you cant listen to 900 mhz... You are wrong again Wandy.. btw
Where is the email reply from Riley backing up your claim?

Read this quote out loud dickhead

(16) "readily accessible to the general public" means, with respect
to a radio communication, that such communication is not--

transmitted on frequencies allocated under part 25, subpart D, E,
or F of part 74, or part 94 of the Rules of the Federal
Communications Commission, unless, in the case of a communication
transmitted on a frequency allocated under part 74 that is not
exclusively allocated to broadcast auxiliary services, the
communication is a two-way voice communication by radio;

"American Homo 352"



was slapped like the little asswipe he is

Jeezeee!!! you're stupid!






























































































..































































_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account