Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old March 28th 05, 05:30 AM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:55:46 -0500, "Leland C. Scott"
wrote in :

snip
I really don't think it's worth the effort since the PLL can track any
minor drifting that would require retuning of a state-variable filter.


I would think you could use the PLL directly by keeping the VCO frequency
range narrow. The loop filter doesn't have to be anything that complex,
state variable that is.



I tried the state variable filter as a stand-alone device, not as a
PLL filter. Although it might be interesting to see what happens when
it -is- used as a PLL filter -- probably get all kinds of FM and
intermod distortion......






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #22   Report Post  
Old April 1st 05, 09:41 AM
Leland C. Scott
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:55:46 -0500, "Leland C. Scott"
wrote in :

snip
I really don't think it's worth the effort since the PLL can track any
minor drifting that would require retuning of a state-variable filter.


I would think you could use the PLL directly by keeping the VCO frequency
range narrow. The loop filter doesn't have to be anything that complex,
state variable that is.



I tried the state variable filter as a stand-alone device, not as a
PLL filter. Although it might be interesting to see what happens when
it -is- used as a PLL filter -- probably get all kinds of FM and
intermod distortion......


The filter should control the speed of phase locking to some extent and will
also help to remove phase noise from the signal you're trying to lock too,
but for your use that doesn't really matter.


--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

Linux - The alternative OS to Micro$oft Windows


  #23   Report Post  
Old May 26th 05, 01:57 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

quoting:
If the FCC only permits voice communication on CB, doesn't that
prevent deaf people from using the band? I think TTY, as well as CW,
should be permitted for that reason alone. If it became a petition,
would it pass?



Channel 23 is shared with radio control, which allows all kinds of
things. If you did it on 23, you just might be ok.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017