Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Smith" wrote:
No. NOT SHOCKING... ECCONOMICLY BURDENING!!!--to the party sued... Regards, John "Steveo" wrote in message ... | "John Smith" wrote: | I am not positive here | | SHOCKING Do ewe soo the mall when you fall down in the parking lot too, F U Bailey? |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: (John=A0Smith)
I am not positive here (and I am no lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to take your posts and pics to one), but you seem in violation of the stalking laws-- Cite the single passage you misinterpret him violating as pertains to stalking laws. 36 W. Gay St., Suite 311, Columbus, OH 43215 614-221-1255 PHONE | 888-622-9315 TOLL-FREE | 614-221-6357 FAX | www.actionohio.org OHIO LAW Menacing by Stalking “No person by engaging in a pattern of conduct shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause physical harm to the other person or cause mental distress to the other person.” “Pattern of conduct” is defined as “two or more actions or incidents closely related in time, whether or not there has been a prior conviction based on any of those actions or incidents. The law has been amended to expand the definition of “pattern of conduct” to include cyberstalking (e.g. such as sending threatening messages, posting such messages on a computer bulletin board, using a computer bulletin board or listserv to induce a third person to engage in stalking conduct against the victim, or using the Global Positioning System to track the whereabouts of the victim). Actions or incidents that prevent, obstruct, or delay the performance by a public official, firefighter, rescuer, emergency medical services person, or emergency facility person of any authorized act within the public official’s, firefighter’s, rescuer’s emergency medical services person’s, or emergency facility person’s official capacity may constitute a ‘pattern of conduct.’” “Physical harm” is defined as “any injury, illness, or other physiological impairment, regardless of its gravity or duration.” “Mental distress” is defined as “any mental illness or condition that involves some temporary substantial incapacity or any mental illness or condition that would normally require psychiatric treatment, psychological treatment, or other mental health services whether or not any person requested or received psychiatric treatment, psychological treatment, or other mental health services.” The law prohibits stalking or harassing someone repeatedly through electronic means, such as by e-mail, web chat room, or message board. Posting false information on the Internet to cause another person to stalk an individual is also illegal. (The Ohio Domestic Violence Benchbook – A Practical Guide to Competence for Judges & Magistrates, Second Edition, Family Violence Prevention Center, Ohio Office of Criminal Justice Services.) |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I said "I am not a lawyer", at this point, if it were me, I'd be consulting
one.... John "I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message ... From: (John Smith) I am not positive here (and I am no lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to take your posts and pics to one), but you seem in violation of the stalking laws-- Cite the single passage you misinterpret him violating as pertains to stalking laws. I think if he now sues your A$$ he will have gobs of money to feed his kids with!!! Regards, John No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think about such things. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, you think that harassing a man, such as being done here, would NOT be
found to be offensive to the general public??? You think the general public would support your abuse of this man??? Well, maybe so, or maybe you should rethink that.... Regards, John "I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message ... From: pam (itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge) (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:9844-4276C807- : From: (John Smith) I am not positive here (and I am no lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to take your posts and pics to one), but you seem in violation of the stalking laws-- Cite the single passage you misinterpret him violating as pertains to stalking laws. I think if he now sues your A$$ he will have gobs of money to feed his kids with!!! Regards, John - No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think about such things. - You have no idea who made the invite, The rest of your post assumes the above to be true. You have discounted the possibility the identity of one who made such a physical threat was found immediately after the post and logged with the isp's he utilized, due to them being contacted and instructed future legal ramifications may arise referring this specific user due his violation of the law. But I'll play devil's advocate for you. some one says they are george bush and to come to the white house you have carte blanche to go there? Good point. I taught N3CVJ this a few posts ago when he said saying something on usenet is the same as a guilty plea in a court of law. Where were you then? : ) Dont be so ****ing stupid. just the same as I AM NOW CHRIS BUSCH loL this assclown is as clueless as you tipsy.. and thats bad (shrug) Clueless is providing the FCC a false address. It's also a crime. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge) (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:9844-4276C807- : From: (John=A0Smith) I am not positive here (and I am no lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to take your posts and pics to one), but you seem in violation of the stalking laws-- Cite the single passage you misinterpret him violating as pertains to stalking laws. I think if he now sues your A$$ he will have gobs of money to feed his kids with!!! Regards, John - No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think about such things. - You have no idea who made the invite, The rest of your post assumes the above to be true. You have discounted the possibility the identity of one who made such a physical threat was found immediately after the post and logged with the isp's he utilized, due to them being contacted and instructed future legal ramifications may arise referring this specific user due his violation of the law. But I'll play devil's advocate for you. Cite the single passage you misinterpret him being exempt from as pertains to stalking laws. |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge) "John Smith" wrote in : I said "I am not a lawyer", at this point, if it were me, I'd be consulting one.... John John he is no lawyer either thats why his advise sucks wind. No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think about such things. 6 W. Gay St., Suite 311, Columbus, OH 43215 614-221-1255 PHONE | 888-622-9315 TOLL-FREE | 614-221-6357 FAX | www.actionohio.org OHIO LAW Menacing by Stalking "No person by engaging in a pattern of conduct shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause physical harm to the other person or cause mental distress to the other person." Daaaamn,,,,Dogie is guilty fo this not with one person not with two people here, but with a boatload. "Pattern of conduct" is defined as "two or more actions or incidents closely related in time, whether or not there has been a prior .conviction based on any of those actions or .incidents. The "actions' you speak of were initiated and perpetuated by Dogie. He could not sue one for behaviors he initiated and committed countless times against others. The law has been amended to expand the definition of "pattern of conduct" to include cyberstalking (e.g. such as sending .threatening messages, posting such messages on a computer bulletin board, using a computer .bulletin board or listserv to induce a third person Just what did you consider the threats Dogie posted? Oh, that's right, you claim you can't be sure it's him, but you can be sure it's Mopar..lol. to engage in stalking conduct against the victim, or using the Global Positioning System to track the whereabouts of the victim). Actions or incidents that prevent, obstruct, or delay the performance by a public official, firefighter, rescuer, emergency medical services person, or emergency facility person of any authorized act within the public official's, firefighter's, rescuer's emergency medical services person's, or emergency facility person's official capacity may constitute a 'pattern of conduct.'" Yep,,,once could certainly argue that jamming a repeater as Dogie did constitutes the prevention, delay or obstruction of possible emergencies. "Physical harm" is defined as "any injury, illness, or other physiological impairment, regardless of its gravity or duration." Yea,,this goes with the word "tangible" you can't comprehend. "Mental distress" is defined as "any mental illness or condition that involves some temporary substantial incapacity or any mental illness or condition that would normally require psychiatric treatment, psychological treatment, or other mental health services whether or not any person requested or received psychiatric treatment, psychological treatment, or other mental health services." Yet, Dogie received mandatory court ordered treatment for his mental instability resulting in crimes against children and the state. The law prohibits stalking or harassing someone repeatedly through electronic means, such as by e-mail, Cool,,,,I knew I saved all the threats he made for a reason. web chat room, or message board. Those too. Posting false information on the Internet to cause another person to stalk an individual is .also illegal. LOL,,,,y'all should be shaking in your fairie boots right about now with such an overwhelming amount of evidence against Dogie. (The Ohio Domestic Violence Benchbook - A Practical Guide to Competence for Judges & Magistrates, Second Edition, Family Violence Prevention Center, Ohio Office of Criminal Justice Services.) Now,,if only you could cite a single source that claims "law" as a definition of "tangible"...LMFAO! |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: OOP's - FA: Motorola HT1250 ls UHF Portable-This Unit Has "Voice Storage" Option Works Great !!! | Swap | |||
OOPS! CBS is in bed with the Kerry Campaign! | Shortwave | |||
XP Firewall And Amateur Radio Software | General | |||
oops | CB |