(Freeband=A0sucks)
where can we find one?

Ask the other person you refer by use of the term "we" in your posts, or
else you can continue to foster your lack of intellect in all you touch
and approach.

From: (Freeband=A0sucks)

where can we find one?


The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you
what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now
think about different modes,,outside the box....think about
UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic
hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you.
Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually
mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : )

On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (FreebandÂ*sucks)

where can we find one?


The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you
what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now
think about different modes,,outside the box....think about
UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic
hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you.
Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually
mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : )

no,the subject says 11 meters. not part 15 transceivers, not uhf.
what part of 11 meters cant you understand?

now answer the question,where can i find an 11 meter spread spectrum
cb radio? if you don't know admit it!

you just have to learn, you shouldnt make posts stating something as
fact unless you can back up your statements with facts.
you fall way short of that little boy

On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (FreebandÂ*sucks)

where can we find one?


The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you
what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now
think about different modes,,outside the box....think about
UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic
hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you.
Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually
mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : )

no,the subject says 11 meters. not part 15 transceivers, not uhf.
what part of 11 meters cant you understand?

now answer the question,where can i find an 11 meter spread spectrum
cb radio? if you don't know admit it!

you just have to learn, you shouldnt make posts stating something as
fact unless you can back up your statements with facts.
you fall way short of that little boy

IAmNotGeorgeBusch is just a con man playing his usual word games.
All he can do is spin, no actual facts.

On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Freeband*sucks)

where can we find one?


The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you
what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now
think about different modes,,outside the box....think about
UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic
hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you.
Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually
mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : )


I've been watching this topic with some interest. IMHO the only true
method of SS is the direct sequencing method. Frequency hopping sort
of "cheats" the concept of a wideband and barely distinguishable SS
system. Direct sequence is also more secure than FH.

Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered spread spectrum in
today's marketplace.

As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First off, there are no
commercial CB radios made with this technology. Even hams have been
slow to embrace it. That's not to say that enterprising experimenters
have not played with it on 11 meters. Utilizing cordless phones and
transverters might yield satisfactory results. I'm sure there may be a
few that have. But it's hardly in widespread use.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Freeband sucks)

where can we find one?


The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you
what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now
think about different modes,,outside the box....think about
UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic
hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you.
Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually
mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : )


I've been watching this topic with some interest. IMHO the only true
method of SS is the direct sequencing method. Frequency hopping sort
of "cheats" the concept of a wideband and barely distinguishable SS
system. Direct sequence is also more secure than FH.

Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered spread spectrum in
today's marketplace.

As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First off, there are no
commercial CB radios made with this technology. Even hams have been
slow to embrace it. That's not to say that enterprising experimenters
have not played with it on 11 meters. Utilizing cordless phones and
transverters might yield satisfactory results. I'm sure there may be a
few that have. But it's hardly in widespread use.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Hello, Dave

The problem would be SWR with the requisite bandwidth. Of course, if anyone
has any of those old Heathkit Cantennas

There is a thought. 1.1 to 1 SWR from something like zero to 30 MHz. Not
bad somewhat above too; just add oil and turn on your amplifier LOL.


Best regards from Rochester, NY
Jim - cooking at 3 megabaud

"Jim Hampton" wrote:
There is a thought. 1.1 to 1 SWR from something like zero to 30 MHz.
Not bad somewhat above too; just add oil and turn on your amplifier LOL.

Sparrow never tasted so good.

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
"Jim Hampton" wrote:
There is a thought. 1.1 to 1 SWR from something like zero to 30 MHz.
Not bad somewhat above too; just add oil and turn on your amplifier LOL.

Sparrow never tasted so good.

Is that an African Sparrow carrying a coconut?

Landshark


--
Treat people as if they were what
they ought to be and you will help
them become what they are capable
of becoming.

On Thu, 05 May 2005 18:09:39 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote in :

snip
Hello, Dave

The problem would be SWR with the requisite bandwidth. Of course, if anyone
has any of those old Heathkit Cantennas


Or a discone. That's one of the preferred commercial antennas for SS
on VHF/UHF. SWR isn't flat but it's low over a 10:1 range of spectrum.
The only problem is the poor gain. I wonder if anyone has ever tried
to build a phased discone array.....







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (Freeband=A0sucks)
where can we find one?
-
The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you
what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now
think about different modes,,outside the box....think about
UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic
hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you.
Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually
mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : )

I've been watching this topic with some

interest. IMHO the only true method of SS is

the direct sequencing method.


Yea,,that's what i meant when I said "digital" sequencing.

Frequency

hopping sort of "cheats" the concept of a

wideband and barely distinguishable SS

system.




Yea,,I guess it could be seen that way,,,but,,why couldn't the
technology be programmed to hop "wider" (for lack of a better term at
the moment)?


Direct sequence is also more secure than FH.


I'm not up on the latest encryption technique regrading this technology,
but take your word for it. But,,,why would a direct sequence (definite
pattern) be more secire than a random pattern?


Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered
spread spectrum in today's marketplace.


Yep it is.

As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First
off, there are no commercial CB radios made

with this technology.



I never said there was. I said the technology was there and blew a
gasket in a certain poster's gray matter and now he is all wrapped up in
himself blathering incoherently about a cb radio when I referred the
freeband.

Even hams have been slow to embrace it.

That's not to say that enterprising

experimenters have not played with it on 11

.meters.



BINGO!

Utilizing cordless phones and transverters

might yield satisfactory results. I'm sure there

may be a few that have. But it's hardly in

widespread use.

Agreed.


Dave

."Sandbagger"

n3cvj